Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

Freedom Flotilla

1000 replies

Badh · 06/06/2025 23:11

Thought this might be worth its own thread. The freedom flotilla The Madleen was getting close to Gaza but seems to have made a diversion, as it was the closest boat to answer a distress call. They seem to also have four Sudanese asylum seekers on board who were trying to escape the Libyan coast patrol.

The UK and France are asking Israel for its safe passage.

The tracker is here but is in and out of action.
https://freedomflotilla.org/ffc-tracker/

More details here, although the latest detour is not covered in the article.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-navy-gears-up-to-block-high-profile-protest-ship-headed-for-gaza/amp/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
52
Whatsinanamehey · 10/06/2025 21:24

@1dayatatime thank you for the update. I read your previous post and I was just replying to say I think you made a fair point.

mouthpipette · 10/06/2025 21:30

What about all those people who say that you can't expect Israel to negotiate with terrorists. Right, but you can expect them to ARM and work with other terrorists of their choice from Gaza. Make it make sense. @Whatsinanamehey

During the Syrian civil war, Israel was patching up wounded ISIS fighters and sending them back over the border to fight Assad. My enemy's enemy makes strange bedfellows. It's all politics.

1dayatatime · 10/06/2025 21:32

Whatsinanamehey · 10/06/2025 21:24

@1dayatatime thank you for the update. I read your previous post and I was just replying to say I think you made a fair point.

Thank you for the thank you 😀!

Either way I personally just see as a publicity stunt for Thornberg that has detracted attention away from the more important topic of getting proper aid to ordinary Gazans.

Whatsinanamehey · 10/06/2025 21:36

1dayatatime · 10/06/2025 21:32

Thank you for the thank you 😀!

Either way I personally just see as a publicity stunt for Thornberg that has detracted attention away from the more important topic of getting proper aid to ordinary Gazans.

Hmm I have to disagree that it's detracted away when there's been alot more talk on the humanitarian situation since. But we will probably have to agree to disagree on that.

1dayatatime · 10/06/2025 21:42

@mouthpipette

"During the Syrian civil war, Israel was patching up wounded ISIS fighters and sending them back over the border to fight Assad. My enemy's enemy makes strange bedfellows. It's all politics."

Sorry but you just made this up.

Israel provided medical aid to ordinary civilians during the Syrian conflict not "patching up ISIS fighters".

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/syria-war-israel-charity-amaliah-fsa-idf-syrian-civilians-women-children-medical-treatment-a7469421.html

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IsraelihumanitariannoperationsduringgtheSyriannCivilWar

The fact that you have tried to turn a genuine humanitarian act into some kind of fake claim of Israel proving medical aid to ISIS is very telling about your actual motives and bias.

MushMonster · 10/06/2025 21:46

1dayatatime · 10/06/2025 21:22

So of the 12 passengers, Thornberg and three others agreed to be deported.

The 8 others refused to leave , so now their deportation case has to go before a court and in the meantime they are being held in detention.

Rather curiously the pro Palestinian Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC) has called this detention illegal and for the 8 to be allowed to leave Israel.

So you now have a bizarre logic where 8 people are refusing to voluntarily leave Israel so it has to go to court ,but at the same time their own FFC group are calling for them to be allowed to voluntarily leave Israel and claiming they are being illegally detained.

I have never been deported, but I think that deportation has a harsh legal implication. You will not be able to enter that country in the future, plus remains in your file and could affect other visas.
Leaving on your own accord is legally preferable. Taking into account that they did not enter Israel willingly, deportation sounds like not a good option, legally speaking.

Badh · 10/06/2025 21:55

MushMonster · 10/06/2025 21:46

I have never been deported, but I think that deportation has a harsh legal implication. You will not be able to enter that country in the future, plus remains in your file and could affect other visas.
Leaving on your own accord is legally preferable. Taking into account that they did not enter Israel willingly, deportation sounds like not a good option, legally speaking.

Yes this is correct. Legally speaking it’s not a great option. They have to sign that they illegally entered the country. I assume they talked this through with legal advisors before hand and decided what they would do.

There is a legal argument that because thdy were taken in international waters and brought to Israel they are being illegally detained but it is not clear cut, as far as I understand.

OP posts:
1dayatatime · 10/06/2025 22:23

@MushMonster

"Leaving on your own accord is legally preferable. Taking into account that they did not enter Israel willingly, deportation sounds like not a good option, legally speaking."

Although leaving voluntarily is legally the best option and going to court to be deported is legally the worst option.

If you consider it from a PR perspective then refusing to voluntarily leave and deported gets the most publicity.

Especially if your own group can then somehow spin it that you are being illegally detained and calling that you should be able to voluntarily leave (even though you have said no to this).

Badh · 10/06/2025 22:32

I’m not really understanding you @1dayatatime

Nobody got the option to voluntarily leave. Greta was deported.

OP posts:
1dayatatime · 10/06/2025 22:38

@Badh

Voluntary deportation, also known as voluntary departure, is a process where an individual who is not legally permitted to stay in a country is allowed to leave on their own accord rather than being forcibly removed by authorities. This process allows individuals to avoid the negative consequences of forced removal, such as re-entry bans.

Here's a more detailed explanation:
Not forced removal:
Voluntary deportation means leaving the country willingly, without being physically escorted out. 





Avoids re-entry bans:
Opting for voluntary departure can sometimes lead to shorter re-entry bans, especially if the individual covers their travel expenses, <a class="break-all" href="https://www.google.com/url?q=www.richardnelsonllp.co.uk/guides/deportation-process-in-the-uk/&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiH0faE6OeNAxUXZ0EAHXQgHMoQjJEMegQIHRAB&usg=AOvVaw2cKhQE7zx4wdli5jPlTfuY" rel="nofollow" target="blank">according to Richard Nelson LLPP. 





Can be assisted:
Some countries offer financial or other assistance to individuals participating in voluntary return programs. 





Not a punishment:
Voluntary deportation is not a form of punishment, but rather an option given to individuals who are not legally allowed to remain in the country. 





Potential for re-entry:
While some re-entry bans may apply, the individual's future ability to return to the country is not necessarily permanently barred, depending on the specific circumstances and regulations

Badh · 10/06/2025 22:48

It’s not the same as voluntarily leaving
. Greta had to sign a document saying she had illegally entered Israel.

Other activists may not want to do this. And from the sounds of it, there is legal argument against deportation in this case.

I think you are trying to say - oh look at this it makes no sense. But there is sense to it.

OP posts:
MushMonster · 10/06/2025 23:03

Voluntary departure would make sense on this case, but it does not sound like they were offered that one, with the document they signed.
I do not think they should be said to have entered Israel illegally, because they did not. They were taken there. As far as I know they were in international waters, were not they?
And I was understanding that the illegal detention does refer to that. They have been taken to Israel, not entered Israel illegally, and they are requested to sign some not accurate papers or go to court?

MushMonster · 10/06/2025 23:05

Anyway, they are well and fed.

The where the aid cargo is now and whether aid is effectively and unobstructedly going into Gaza is the important matter.
Plus whether Netanyahu is going to stop arming flipping criminals and terrorists, starting from today.

Drangea · 10/06/2025 23:25

Protests by thousands in France apparently for the release of the boat “hostages”.
Were there any protests when 30 French civilians died and 7(?) I think were taken hostage in October 2023? No? What could the difference be do you think?

Nowayyousure · 10/06/2025 23:44

1dayatatime · 10/06/2025 21:22

So of the 12 passengers, Thornberg and three others agreed to be deported.

The 8 others refused to leave , so now their deportation case has to go before a court and in the meantime they are being held in detention.

Rather curiously the pro Palestinian Freedom Flotilla Coalition (FFC) has called this detention illegal and for the 8 to be allowed to leave Israel.

So you now have a bizarre logic where 8 people are refusing to voluntarily leave Israel so it has to go to court ,but at the same time their own FFC group are calling for them to be allowed to voluntarily leave Israel and claiming they are being illegally detained.

By refusing to leave and having to wait for a date to be forced to leave they will claim they are being held. Strange people.

Nowayyousure · 10/06/2025 23:45

Drangea · 10/06/2025 23:25

Protests by thousands in France apparently for the release of the boat “hostages”.
Were there any protests when 30 French civilians died and 7(?) I think were taken hostage in October 2023? No? What could the difference be do you think?

They refused to leave, so not being held. Protesters aren't good with logic.

mouthpipette · 11/06/2025 00:41

1dayatatime · 10/06/2025 21:42

@mouthpipette

"During the Syrian civil war, Israel was patching up wounded ISIS fighters and sending them back over the border to fight Assad. My enemy's enemy makes strange bedfellows. It's all politics."

Sorry but you just made this up.

Israel provided medical aid to ordinary civilians during the Syrian conflict not "patching up ISIS fighters".

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/syria-war-israel-charity-amaliah-fsa-idf-syrian-civilians-women-children-medical-treatment-a7469421.html

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IsraelihumanitariannoperationsduringgtheSyriannCivilWar

The fact that you have tried to turn a genuine humanitarian act into some kind of fake claim of Israel proving medical aid to ISIS is very telling about your actual motives and bias.

It's what I heard/read/saw from more than one source, I'll see if I can back it up with sources and get back to you.

YourOnMute · 11/06/2025 01:04

NotABottie · 10/06/2025 11:59

You are continuing to equate the suffragettes with Hamas.

Please do go and watch the Oct 7th videos and then come back and confirm your position.

Please do go and read my posts.
Please do show me where I'm continuing to equate the suffragettes with Hamas.

This is my third separate post where I've been either accused or grossly misinterpreted. This is my third time pointing this out and my third time requesting evidence.
My last two requests were not addressed.

YourOnMute · 11/06/2025 01:05

quantumbutterfly · 10/06/2025 12:05

Force teaming hamas and the suffragettes? seriously?

As above, thank you.

YourOnMute · 11/06/2025 01:07

SharonEllis · 10/06/2025 12:03

No I wasnt directing it specifically at you, a more general point about the regularity with which the 'one man's terrorist is another's freedom fighter' comes up, yes, usually in response to Hamas or previous/othef Palestinian terrorists - who else would we be talking about on this board?

I suspect you're right, I can't be arsed to check but on this particular occasion it may have been a reference to the terrorist sympathisers involved in this silly stunt, rather than specifically hamas fighters themselves. I dont think it makes a very material difference to the argument, myself.

You weren't,but you wrote it while quoting my post. Got it.

YourOnMute · 11/06/2025 01:11

EasternStandard · 10/06/2025 13:20

Hamas are a proscribed terrorist organisation in the U.K. so I’d be wary of downplaying that online.

Sigh...yet again. I never once said anything about Hamas. But hey, why don't you report me for promotion of terrorism, if you do believe that is what I'm doing on this thread?
Why do posters think it's ok to make such baseless accusations??

YourOnMute · 11/06/2025 01:14

EasyTouch · 10/06/2025 15:08

You forceteamed all sorts of activists with Hamas by stating that all of them were at one time called terrorists by the powers that be.
Thus implying that "terrorist" , no matter the actual actions of said groups/individuals has no foundation in objectivity, but is a fabrication of "the state" by its declaration.
You doing this implies that you think that either the actions of Hamas, (including putting Gazans in the schtuck that they are in now) are justified or you are sullying the names and aims of Mandela, the Suffragettes, MLK, Malcolm X in an "end justified the means" way.
Which is weird as the above groups/people demanded equity, parity and justice and for their people to be left the fuck alone.
Hamas deliberately, as policy puts it's people in harm's way because the obliteration of a people and state and any encroachment on them is their ultimate aim.

Peace, a Palestinian state and equity/ equality for all Palestinians
With or without the existence of Israel is not the aim of Hamas, at all.

Hamas can't lace the shoes of MLK, Malcolm X, the Suffragettes, the IRA, Winnie or Nelson Mandela, Black Panthers etc where it comes to strategy, cost effectiveness and efficacy, messaging, curation of support/allies, aims, intellectualism.

The Black groups were especially vigilant of the potential narcissism of "allies" in a way that ALL pro Palestinian groups from Palestine have not been in my lifetime.

Infantilism and "anything helps" weren't much of a thing.
It was more shit or get off the pot. No time for no "Radical Chic". Human dignity is at stake here, please and thanks! This ain't no fucking crèche!

Another and very important reason for the lack of Palestinian progression.

No I didn't do this, but thank you for showing how quick you are to jump to accusations.

mouthpipette · 11/06/2025 01:17

Sorry but you just made this up. @1dayatatime

No I didn't, it's been "made up" by many people and it must have some credibility otherwise Wiki wouldn't reference it.

Wiki was not my primary source.

Anyway, should it be false, it's not as if Israel aiding IS were a very grave sin. The realpolitik of the situation would demand it. i.e. it's in our best interests.

YourOnMute · 11/06/2025 01:18

Martymcfly24 · 10/06/2025 16:53

I have been accused of being one because in a post I made about the actions of the Israeli government I didn't mention Hamas (nothing to do with the post) which meant I clearly supported them.

Thing is you become desensitized once you hear it to often.

I'm one too now apparently.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.