Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Thread gallery
25
Dulra · 04/09/2024 08:56

whataclownshow · 04/09/2024 08:52

Bingo.

No just gibberish unless it can be backed up with examples tbh

TimeTravellingTyrion · 04/09/2024 09:16

Dulra · 04/09/2024 08:46

Why do you ask these questions? They are so goady, where has anyone on this thread suggested that there should not be a two state solution? and where has anyone said that jews should not have their own country?

You have said that the Isreali government would not currently support a two state solution
Does @Miffylou honestly think that the Israeli government will willingly accept a two state solution when all they do is steal more land every month?
At the moment, no. But in the long term, with a new Israeli leader and enough cast-iron guarantees from the international community that the security of Israel would be protected and defended, yes.

So where does that leave Gaza now?

Lalaloveya doesn't want a Jewish state. And I doubt itoosurvive does either after their spiel about how Hamas aren't actually antisemitic and have nothing against Jews actually but are simply defending themselves against those nasty zionists and their awful supporters who often happen to be Jews. Posts which are still up despite defending Hamas being fucking illegal but @mnhq have made it very clear they don't give a shit about antisemitism.

Miffylou · 04/09/2024 09:29

Scirocco · 03/09/2024 23:47

Well, this wasn't asked of me, but here is my answer.

Firstly, I think there is a distinction to be made between defensive support of an ally and faciitation of aggression against a civilian population. I would have supported a targeted, intelligence-led, ideally jointly coordinated and overseen operation, carried out within international law, against the terrorist organisation responsible for pretty much the worst terrorist atrocity since 9/11 (even knowing that people and places I care about would have been in harm's way). I also think international laws and limits should be applicable for all and that governments should not expect to be given weapons by countries who claim to uphold those standards without also being expected to adhere to those in the use of the resources made available. So, I don't think governments should say "fend for yourself", but I also don't think they should be giving a free pass when it comes to international law.

In your hypothetical situation, a country and its civilian population would be at risk of harm and potentially destruction. Regardless of whatever went before, the right thing to do would be to protect the innocent population at risk. Just as innocent Palestinians do not deserve to die because of the heinous actions of the people in power, nor do innocent Israelis deserve that fate because of whatever acts of the leadership in your scenario led to the international community stopping military assistance in the scenario.

I would point out that neighbouring Arab countries have been involved in trying to protect Israel. When Iran launched missiles and drones, countries helped their neighbour. It would be likely that a defensive coalition to protect the existence of Israel would also include other countries in the region and that even countries which might 'keep out of' actual direct interventions might contribute in other ways. Israel is not alone and will not be alone. Its government should still be expected to conduct itself in accordance with basic ethical and legal standards though.

I don’t disagree with much of that. My point of disagreement would be that it is impossible for Israel to target Hamas without any of the "innocent population" getting hurt or even killed, terrible as that conclusion may be, when Hamas embed themselves (and imprison the abducted hostages) in, or in tunnels beneath, residential blocks, mosques, hospitals etc. I don’t see how, given that situation, identification and clinical targeting of the murderers and rapists and their leaders and supporters, without anyone else getting hurt, was ever possible.

I don’t support Israeli actions on the West Bank, but in Gaza ordinary civilians have not been the primary targets. They have suffered terribly, but this was anticipated, and has been welcomed, by Hamas leaders who are on record as saying so because they think it will increase international sympathy for their cause.

Hamas and Hezbollah, on the other hand, deliberately target civilian areas in Israel with their rockets. It is only thanks to Israel's superior air defences that not many civilians have been killed. Ironically, this means Israel gets far less sympathy.

Dulra · 04/09/2024 09:41

TimeTravellingTyrion · 04/09/2024 09:16

Lalaloveya doesn't want a Jewish state. And I doubt itoosurvive does either after their spiel about how Hamas aren't actually antisemitic and have nothing against Jews actually but are simply defending themselves against those nasty zionists and their awful supporters who often happen to be Jews. Posts which are still up despite defending Hamas being fucking illegal but @mnhq have made it very clear they don't give a shit about antisemitism.

Why are you telling me this? Tag them I have no idea what their views are but at least tag them so they have an opportunity to respond they may not see this otherwise

TimeTravellingTyrion · 04/09/2024 09:44

TimeTravellingTyrion · 04/09/2024 09:16

Lalaloveya doesn't want a Jewish state. And I doubt itoosurvive does either after their spiel about how Hamas aren't actually antisemitic and have nothing against Jews actually but are simply defending themselves against those nasty zionists and their awful supporters who often happen to be Jews. Posts which are still up despite defending Hamas being fucking illegal but @mnhq have made it very clear they don't give a shit about antisemitism.

Why are you telling me this?

Um... because you asked? Sorry didn't realise I'm not allowed to answer a question on an open forum.

Edit: quoted the wrong post.

Scirocco · 04/09/2024 09:46

Capability existed to minimise civilian casualties, @Miffylou . For example, by not shooting children or civilian healthcare professionals; by using the targeted military technologies to carry out precise strikes; by not intentionally targeting essential infrastructure; by not preventing the departure of civilians via the Rafah crossing; etc.

Civilians die in wars. This is an inescapable reality of combat, particularly in urban areas. When I am saying this, I am talking about the deaths of people I care about. I have watched people I care about die in combat and disaster zones, I have family members who have given their lives in wartime, I have treated casualties while under direct risk myself. I am aware that being a non-combatant in a conflict zone is a high risk thing. There is, however, an internationally agreed and recognised expectation that certain processes should be respected in order to minimise civilian casualties. Instead, what we are seeing is politicians, military leaders and media figures calling for genocide.

OP posts:
Scirocco · 04/09/2024 09:49

TimeTravellingTyrion · 04/09/2024 09:44

Why are you telling me this?

Um... because you asked? Sorry didn't realise I'm not allowed to answer a question on an open forum.

Edit: quoted the wrong post.

Edited

I think the suggestion is that if you're going to accuse people of what is actually a pretty serious (and potentially criminal) offence, you should probably @ them so they have an opportunity to respond or at least be aware that they've been accused of this.

OP posts:
Dulra · 04/09/2024 09:50

TimeTravellingTyrion · 04/09/2024 09:44

Why are you telling me this?

Um... because you asked? Sorry didn't realise I'm not allowed to answer a question on an open forum.

Edit: quoted the wrong post.

Edited

Ok but you have accused posters of something so maybe tag them so they can respond. I have no idea whether what you have said is true you've named posters without quoting them so it is still quite vague.

Miffylou · 04/09/2024 09:53

Scirocco · 04/09/2024 09:46

Capability existed to minimise civilian casualties, @Miffylou . For example, by not shooting children or civilian healthcare professionals; by using the targeted military technologies to carry out precise strikes; by not intentionally targeting essential infrastructure; by not preventing the departure of civilians via the Rafah crossing; etc.

Civilians die in wars. This is an inescapable reality of combat, particularly in urban areas. When I am saying this, I am talking about the deaths of people I care about. I have watched people I care about die in combat and disaster zones, I have family members who have given their lives in wartime, I have treated casualties while under direct risk myself. I am aware that being a non-combatant in a conflict zone is a high risk thing. There is, however, an internationally agreed and recognised expectation that certain processes should be respected in order to minimise civilian casualties. Instead, what we are seeing is politicians, military leaders and media figures calling for genocide.

We will just have to disagree on this. No doubt Israel could have done things better, but I have never heard of any other war where civilians received notice to leave particular areas or buildings before they were targeted.

The actions of Hamas nearly a year ago precipitated all this death and misery. What do you suppose they thought Israel's reaction to their murderous rampage and abductions would be?

Scirocco · 04/09/2024 10:00

Miffylou · 04/09/2024 09:53

We will just have to disagree on this. No doubt Israel could have done things better, but I have never heard of any other war where civilians received notice to leave particular areas or buildings before they were targeted.

The actions of Hamas nearly a year ago precipitated all this death and misery. What do you suppose they thought Israel's reaction to their murderous rampage and abductions would be?

Edited

Personally, I think this was probably the response (or along same lines) that they anticipated. They chose to sentence people in Gaza to death.

OP posts:
Miffylou · 04/09/2024 10:01

Dulra · 04/09/2024 08:46

Why do you ask these questions? They are so goady, where has anyone on this thread suggested that there should not be a two state solution? and where has anyone said that jews should not have their own country?

You have said that the Isreali government would not currently support a two state solution
Does @Miffylou honestly think that the Israeli government will willingly accept a two state solution when all they do is steal more land every month?
At the moment, no. But in the long term, with a new Israeli leader and enough cast-iron guarantees from the international community that the security of Israel would be protected and defended, yes.

So where does that leave Gaza now?

I ask the questions because they go to the root of the problem. Israel is surrounded by definitely or historically hostile countries. Many of them would prefer that it did not exist. The declared and often repeated aim of Hamas is to wipe Israel off the map.

Zzippit · 04/09/2024 10:03

Dulra · 04/09/2024 08:51

because posters are challenging some of the emotive or sweeping statements being made on this thread
Can you give an example of an emotive or sweeping statement?

Can you please stop asking posters to do this and perhaps RTFT? Maybe start here: Yes the last few pages of this thread are pretty shocking. Clearly for some Palestinian lives are of absolutely no value and work your way back.

Miffylou · 04/09/2024 10:05

Scirocco · 04/09/2024 10:00

Personally, I think this was probably the response (or along same lines) that they anticipated. They chose to sentence people in Gaza to death.

I agree. So how come right from the start nearly all the hundreds of thousands of marchers calling for "ceasefire!" were not calling for Hamas to be overthrown? Or for the abducted hostages to be released immediately? Because all I saw and heard were calls for Israel to stop its fight back.

lionlass · 04/09/2024 10:23

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Miffylou · 04/09/2024 10:25

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Gosh. What a sickening comment.

lionlass · 04/09/2024 10:28

@Miffylou You call it sickening, I call it the truth.

Lalaloveya · 04/09/2024 10:31

Miffylou · 04/09/2024 02:53

Read some history. Rabin was leading Israel to agreement but then was murdered by a right-wing extremist. Later, Bill Clinton said it was Arafat who scuppered the two-state proposal, which was agreed in theory and just waiting for agreement on the fine details, because he said if he accepted it he would be murdered by his own side.

There's no need to be so condescending.

This doesn't prove your point though does it. We'll have to agree to disagree.

Miffylou · 04/09/2024 10:31

lionlass · 04/09/2024 10:28

@Miffylou You call it sickening, I call it the truth.

You are happy, then, to justify the rape, murder and abduction of civilians.

TheOnlyCherryOnMyTree · 04/09/2024 10:32

Lettherebejustice · 04/09/2024 08:34

Some of you really have no idea. It actually makes me so angry when I constantly see the Israeli occupation just waved away with 'well yes we don't agree with that but moving on'. The occupation has and is the root of the problem. Everything else is the effects. Go live in Jenin for a day. Go live in Tubas for a day. And then we will see if you are still singing the same tune.
You have no idea what irreversible harm decades of cruel occupation has caused.

Yup. We wouldn't see them defending Palestinians denying Israelis the right to self determination, stealing their homes and resources, abducting and torturing them, using them as human shields, denying them healthcare, restricting their movement, their education, their water, making disgusting genocidal statements etc because they are scared. Bring up all of these human rights violations and you get a shrug and told that Israelis are scared. You might at a push get a wet its a shame about Palestinian suffering but Israelis are scared. Not any acknowledgement about how living through all of this for decades at the hands of Israel must feel for Palestinians, how terrified they must be day in day out at the actual reality of their lives. Israel can do as they please because they are scared and Palestinians well it's a pity but....

Miffylou · 04/09/2024 10:34

Lalaloveya · 04/09/2024 10:31

There's no need to be so condescending.

This doesn't prove your point though does it. We'll have to agree to disagree.

Sorry if I sounded condescending but you seemed to be unaware of past attempts at establishing a two-state solution. You said "If Israel had wanted a two state solution at any point we'd have had one by now", which was untrue. So what I said did prove my point.

Lalaloveya · 04/09/2024 10:38

No you recall wrongly regarding the deleted post. If you didnt understand my post I'm in favour of separation of church and state in every country which is not a controversial position to have in most parts of the world.

lionlass · 04/09/2024 10:43

@Miffylou I'm saying that what happened on October 7th does not justify what Israel did before or after.

Miffylou · 04/09/2024 10:46

lionlass · 04/09/2024 10:43

@Miffylou I'm saying that what happened on October 7th does not justify what Israel did before or after.

OK, what do you think Israel's response should have been, then?

whataclownshow · 04/09/2024 10:53

@Dulra
I have no idea whether what you have said is true you've named posters without quoting them so it is still quite vague.

I've lost count of the number of posters on these threads tying themselves in knots to claim Hamas' stated aim isn't to kill Jews, just because it wasn't enshrined with a ballpoint pen in their second charter or something.

I could understand if some posters miss these if they rarely dip into these threads, but how odd that they've passed you by. Anyway, here's one from just yesterday on this thread at 12:46 - maybe you were having lunch at the time?

The most recent Hamas charter states that its aim is to dismantle the Zionist state, as is Iran's. Their grievance is not with Jews, per se. Had Israel been colonised by Mormons they would probably hate the Mormons of Israel, instead of the Jews. Iran and Hamas couldn't care less about Jews outside Israel, unless of course those Jews are fervent supporters of the state and facilitators of its actions.

The above is terrorist-excusing (to put it mildly) bollocks.

And we've now got @lionlass framing Hamas as 'the resistance'.