Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

OP posts:
Thread gallery
48
SocoBateVira · 11/06/2024 21:33

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Dulra · 11/06/2024 21:33

PeasfullPerson · 11/06/2024 21:31

It is a highly offensive slur which could be easily applied to anyone who is speaking out against a cause you disagree with. It aims to shut down discussion of the actual issue by discrediting the person with a view you don’t agree with. It is lazy.

Mumsnet already deleted their accusation of it yesterday so it is obviously against talk guidelines

HelenHen · 11/06/2024 21:37

keenforhelp · 11/06/2024 20:58

Bravo.

May I direct you towards the silent 'thanks' button? It will keep the thread tidier and make it easier to follow, rather than quoting a big post with a one word response. I believe that is why the 'thanks' button is there

LordPercyPercy · 11/06/2024 21:39

Before this thread is full, I will say I think it's a pity that there couldn't have been one space for those happy that the four hostages were home safely, could discuss it without massive derailment and arguments.

PeasfullPerson · 11/06/2024 21:39

DownNative · 11/06/2024 21:31

"So you agree a ceasefire is the best way forward?"

Not at the present time, no. Military history shows ceasefires at wrong time prolongs conflict.

"There is no them or us."

Conflict is currently active, so yes there is.

"And you agree you don’t have all the information required to say whether the hostage rescue did or did not break the law, but that it may have done."

Which law do you specifically think was broken?

Oh, you have fallen into the False Dilemma Fallacy. There is no us or them.

I am not a legal expert but I trust the information provided by the UN who have said war crimes may have been committed and mentioned the principles of distinction, proportionality and precaution.

I have no reason to trust your interpretation of the issue. I do now know your level of legal expertise (I assume you don’t work for the UN or similar?) and it is clear you have a bias.

I also have no interest of your interpretation of the issue which is presented as thought it should be taken as fact because you can copy and paste from the IHL website, and when there isn’t enough information to decide one way or the other.

keenforhelp · 11/06/2024 21:39

Auvergne63 · 11/06/2024 21:29

Didn't you post that because (I paraphrase you) not every Palestinian was dead, it can't be a genocide? Yes or no?
Therefore, you deem something to be a genocide only if every single person of that ethnicity/belief/creed is dead. Your post implies this.
By the way, the Holocaust has a huge impact on my family.

@Auvergne63 Imagine growing up in a family where 600 were slaughtered at Auschwitz, where you learn that a grandparent was forced to watch a parent walk into a gas chamber on your Bat mitzvah?

Imagine how that person (me) feels when you reference the Holocaust in the manner that you did. Imagine how many others too?

OP posts:
SocoBateVira · 11/06/2024 21:40

It's pretty interesting how many people genuinely seem to think that they've got to accept the Hamas numbers in the absence of anything else. I didn't know that was a thing until today.

Obviously knew some people are just that naive, and others would accept them because they actively support Hamas. But this thread is the first time I've seen people make the argument that they have to go with Hamas because just not knowing isn't an option. Wondering now if it's common.

noblegiraffe · 11/06/2024 21:41

Dulra · 11/06/2024 21:24

You are discrediting anyone reporting on Gaza and from Gaza because all the news I get comes from independent news agencies, you have pointed out that they are getting their figures from Hamas so who is left to get our news from?

Do you understand that you can get news that appears to be reliable, that there was a hostage rescue mission that ended in a battle with Hamas in a densely populated area with a large number of civilian casualties without coming onto Mumsnet and posting 'Israel murdered 274 civilians while rescuing those 4 hostages'?

SocoBateVira · 11/06/2024 21:41

LordPercyPercy · 11/06/2024 21:39

Before this thread is full, I will say I think it's a pity that there couldn't have been one space for those happy that the four hostages were home safely, could discuss it without massive derailment and arguments.

It really is.

Unfortunately, our self appointed moral exemplars just couldn't help themselves.

keenforhelp · 11/06/2024 21:41

HelenHen · 11/06/2024 21:37

May I direct you towards the silent 'thanks' button? It will keep the thread tidier and make it easier to follow, rather than quoting a big post with a one word response. I believe that is why the 'thanks' button is there

Yeh, so don't instruct me on what to do.

OP posts:
Humdingerydoo · 11/06/2024 21:42

Listen, if you guys are happy to keep spreading misinformation provided by Hamas then we can't stop you. Clearly, MN think calling that behaviour out is more offensive than spreading misinformation provided by terrorists is. So none of us can prevent you from doing so. Just remember this thread next time you complain about how pro-Israel MN is and how you're all the victims of unfair treatment as claimed earlier on this very thread.

LordPercyPercy · 11/06/2024 21:45

It's pretty interesting how many people genuinely seem to think that they've got to accept the Hamas numbers in the absence of anything else. I didn't know that was a thing until today.

This has puzzled me as well. Surely you just accept that the numbers are an uncertainty, and might remain that way for a long time?

I also don't understand why people want the numbers to be as high as possible, surely you'd hope that the least possible civilians were dead?

Humdingerydoo · 11/06/2024 21:45

And if you're not being naive when spreading unverified information from a terrorist organisation as though it's the truth, then it's being done on purpose? Which is obviously a much scarier reality.

SocoBateVira · 11/06/2024 21:47

Humdingerydoo · 11/06/2024 21:45

And if you're not being naive when spreading unverified information from a terrorist organisation as though it's the truth, then it's being done on purpose? Which is obviously a much scarier reality.

Oh very much so. It's evident that some of them haven't realised that being naive is the kinder of the two explanations for their actions.

PeasfullPerson · 11/06/2024 21:47

I will be glad of the day there is no need to argue about how deaths are counted, because all this is over, and that goes for Palestine or Israel.

Whatever the number of deaths, there have been too many.

keenforhelp · 11/06/2024 21:49

keenforhelp · 11/06/2024 21:41

Yeh, so don't instruct me on what to do.

I said bravo as I found that post so inspirational. It just came out.

OP posts:
HelenHen · 11/06/2024 21:49

Humdingerydoo · 11/06/2024 21:28

"useful idiot" is an actual thing. It's not some phrase myself or anyone else on here has made up.

That's incredibly patronising. The original post has already been deleted.

Auvergne63 · 11/06/2024 21:49

LordPercyPercy · 11/06/2024 21:33

Didn't you post that because (I paraphrase you) not every Palestinian was dead, it can't be a genocide? Yes or no?
Therefore, you deem something to be a genocide only if every single person of that ethnicity/belief/creed is dead. Your post implies this.
By the way, the Holocaust has a huge impact on my family.

I said that the death rate (disputed, at that) in no way indicates a genocide (as tragic as any civilian deaths in conflict always are).

Beyond that is entirely just stuff you've said. And now you've mentioned the Holocaust unprompted for a second time.

You wrote and I quote:
"just a genocidal state that is also somehow so inefficient that in eight months most of the over half a million residents are still living?
I have read and re read your post and I can't find where you said the death rate (disputed, at that) in no way indicates a genocide.
Please, point me where you said this.
I am not allowed to mention the Holocaust when my family were the victim of it?
Their suffering must not be spoken of?

noblegiraffe · 11/06/2024 21:50

I barely come on this section because it's terrible, but if people are willing to post the 274 figure from Hamas uncritically and it is simply just accepted and even defended when the issues are pointed out, then the West has a major problem on its hands in the propaganda war.

Humdingerydoo · 11/06/2024 21:50

noblegiraffe · 11/06/2024 21:50

I barely come on this section because it's terrible, but if people are willing to post the 274 figure from Hamas uncritically and it is simply just accepted and even defended when the issues are pointed out, then the West has a major problem on its hands in the propaganda war.

To be fair, they're also posting other figures like 374

HelenHen · 11/06/2024 21:51

noblegiraffe · 11/06/2024 21:41

Do you understand that you can get news that appears to be reliable, that there was a hostage rescue mission that ended in a battle with Hamas in a densely populated area with a large number of civilian casualties without coming onto Mumsnet and posting 'Israel murdered 274 civilians while rescuing those 4 hostages'?

Most news is independently verified, and they will often state when they're unable to do so. We have no other source... yet we keep seeing images of dead children.

79Helene · 11/06/2024 21:51

Thank you.

LordPercyPercy · 11/06/2024 21:51

You wrote and I quote:
"just a genocidal state that is also somehow so inefficient that in eight months most of the over half a million residents are still living?
I have read and re read your post and I can't find where you saidthe death rate (disputed, at that) in no way indicates a genocide.

The two statements mean the same thing.
Did you see the actual post I was replying to, btw? It was deranged.

Humdingerydoo · 11/06/2024 21:51

🇮🇱 bring the rest of the hostages home NOW!

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread