bibo - yay for your great-great granny, love a story like that!
ababs - you are so sweet trying to cheer me up but consultation at IVF clinic last year laid it on pretty thick of the heavy significance of the two years elapsed since I had my DD at 44 (less a week). They made being 44 sound hugely positive in comparison!
wotsits - your AMH sounds fine really. Maybe it would be 'low' for someone in 20's or early 30's, but honestly didn't think alarm bells even started to be rung until AMH is less than 3?
Plus I read an article by doctors at an IVF clinic in New York (Dr N Gleicher & Dr D Barad) which states that by 2011 they had established "close to 50" pregnancies in women with critically low levels of AMH, including many with undetectable levels of AMH, since they have been supplementing these patients with DHEA (25mg x 3 daily) for at least 6 weeks prior to treatment. In short, I don't necessarily think that AMH is the be all and end all that its sometimes made out to be. (At least it suits me to think that, as mine is truly rubbish.)
As regards whether to DTD every day or EOD, I remember asking the exact same question on this thread some months back, with some really helpful replies. I remember in particular one from the lovely Flottilaz - I've checked back and its on Tue 06-Oct-15 23:36:50. At the time, she was aged 45.5 and six months pregnant with a little boy, conceived as a result of her conversion to the EOD theory!
Which makes me think - I guess she must be due her baby around now? So if you're out there Flottilaz - trust all is well and we'd love an update!
Another recommendation for EOD came from a specialist private scanning clinic I've used. Long story, but my periods stopped completely last summer - just when I was about to give IVF a go, great timing! I was told by a couple of doctors it was the dreaded 'M' word (that shall never mentioned on this thread!). Turned out it was purely because thyroid had gone hyperactive and its taken quite a lot of trial and error of medication dose to return it to some semblance of normal (still a bit unstable). Anyway, I was sufficiently freaked out to have 3 or 4 cycles monitored by U/S scans - even though I couldn't TTC (due to Thyroid) in half of those. It amounts to a LOT of scans, with two different senior sonographers. Both are big fans of EOD - they understand how psychologically tricky, how counter-intuitive it can be to skip a day of DTD, but emphasise that its better to allow some time for quantity to recover, but also suggest that it improves quality/tends to increase motility too. (I admit to being a little sceptical about the motility argument, but at least the quantity point is fairly evident in our house - sorry TMI!)
Anyway, this month is probably the first that we've ever tried (sort of) EOD, maybe just because it happened to coincide with our mutual laziness. So we DTD on CD 11, 13 and 14, then stopped. On CD12 I had a positive OPK (which seemed early) plus an U/S scan. The scan showed a mature follicle not yet ovulated, but which from the size she thought could ovulate anytime from CD12 evening through to CD14 morning.
I only mention that because thought it interesting that the scan (as with previous cycles to be fair) completely backed up what OPKs were saying. Personally I've found the PINK Clearblue Digital (the original single hormone ones) to be the most reliable - moreso than the PURPLE Clearblue Digis in my case, actually.
Anyway - we'll have to see. Luckily DD watched a documentary on pandas over Christmas and currently appears more keen on having a baby panda than the baby brother she previously requested. Its totally in the balance which one is more likely.
Oops mega post! Laters x