Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

I have refused to let DSS here every weekend

687 replies

ImthedriverSo · 30/01/2026 17:15

AIBU - looking for thoughts.

DH has 2 ds ages 8 and 10

For years he’s had the system with ex we have them every other weekend fri aft school and drop them to school on the Monday (well I pick up and drop off as dh doesn’t drive it’s an hour each way!)

This is mutual agreement not a court order.

His ex now wants to change that we have them separately - one each weekend and for me to pick up early sat and drop back Sunday morning.

I’ve said no I won’t facilitate. so dh has said no and she is saying no contact then! It has been left in a sour way as he told her no negotiations just that we will get a court order to stick to what we’ve always done.

We like to have more time with them . They like to do the same things - together.
Plus we love our childfree time too. But now dh very down as this weekend we were meant to have them .

AIBU to have said I won’t facilitate this ? It seems a big step back. Less time for them with dh too of its weekly how she wants ???

OP posts:
Strawberry53 · 30/01/2026 23:16

I will admit OP the “we love our child free time” did not read well, considering his ex is full time parenting the vast majority of the time…there’s not a huge amount of time asked of you both. I’m sure you didn’t mean it quite the way it sounds though, as you do sound like a kind caring step mum. I take your point that their mum has moved further away making it logistically more difficult but yeah honestly it just read as a bit unnecessarily blunt.

I think you really need to try to find out why she wants to separate them like this? It’s a very odd idea… it doesn’t make logical sense and as you say siblings probably want to spend time together with their dad… it just doesn’t make any sense. I’d be pushing for an explanation to be honest.

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 30/01/2026 23:23

ApplebyArrows · 30/01/2026 22:55

If he wanted childfree weekends he shouldn't have become a dad. If you wanted childfree weekends you shouldn't have married him.

Maybe he wasn’t ill when he became a Dad. We don’t know and don’t need to know. My Dad was perfectly healthy when I was born, 5 years later he was diagnosed with an illness and by the time I was 13 couldn’t walk.

CollieModdle · 30/01/2026 23:25

The ex moved away. She took the children an hours drive away. She does none of the journeys to or from their Dad’s.

She must have known the Dad couldn’t drive for medical reasons when she moved.

Not many mothers want their children to go to the Dad’s every weekend.

Collecting and returning the children is 4 hours driving for the OP.

Why are the OP and her DH getting such a hard time?

CollieModdle · 30/01/2026 23:25

The ex moved away. She took the children an hours drive away. She does none of the journeys to or from their Dad’s.

She must have known the Dad couldn’t drive for medical reasons when she moved.

Not many mothers want their children to go to the Dad’s every weekend.

Collecting and returning the children is 4 hours driving for the OP.

Why are the OP and her DH getting such a hard time?

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 30/01/2026 23:27

CollieModdle · 30/01/2026 23:25

The ex moved away. She took the children an hours drive away. She does none of the journeys to or from their Dad’s.

She must have known the Dad couldn’t drive for medical reasons when she moved.

Not many mothers want their children to go to the Dad’s every weekend.

Collecting and returning the children is 4 hours driving for the OP.

Why are the OP and her DH getting such a hard time?

Because there’s a lot of bitter posters around who will jump on any opportunity to make the man and step mother the villains as clearly his first wife can do no wrong

grumpygrape · 30/01/2026 23:36

Bushmillsbabe · 30/01/2026 22:08

Many court orders go for 50/50 custody now unless there is a concern about the standard of parenting. So just be aware that going to court could lead to this. I have seen some absolutely crazy schedules issued where the children move every 3 days. And the judge may take a dim view of an EOW set up, so I suggest taking some legal advice from a lawyer specialising in family law, and exploring structured mediation first.

A Court would be unlikely to give 50:50 if father lives an hour away from the school and doesn't drive.

Minortour · 30/01/2026 23:40

Sometimeswinning · 30/01/2026 21:57

I mean my children will always live with me. I’m a good parent.

Id be a lonely little hobbit for my children. I’d follow them. They come first. If only all parents thought like me.

Guessing you didn’t bother?

Is your children's father not a good parent?

So, just a virtuous thing to say then. Easily done.

Didn't bother to do what?

TheDaysAreGettingLongerAgain · 30/01/2026 23:43

Netcurtainnelly · 30/01/2026 17:30

How selfish. I hope it backfires on her. So determined to be in control is she, that she is prepared to hurt and upset her own children.

We only have one side of the story and there are always two sides.

GilmoreGirly86 · 30/01/2026 23:43

You "love your childfree time"?? You get child free time 12 days out of a fortnight. Every other weekend and a holiday in the summer is not a lot of time and is not trying his/your best, it's a joke and absolute bare minimum.
I don't know the age of the children but has anyone asked them what they want? 1 on 1 time might be nice for them, mum, and dad but everyone needs to be on board with it, and it needs to be fair to them and both sets of adults. Wouldn't a pattern over 4 weeks of:
Weekend 1: Ds1 or 2
Weekend 2: Both sons
Weekend 3: Other ds
Weekend 4: Child free
be fairer?
Therefore both mum and dad (you!) get a weekend "off," children get 1 on 1 time with both parents and two weekends together, one at each house. You/dad see slightly more of them/they see slightly more of you, Mum gets her 1 to 1 time and you get your "child free time."
Court order also necessary for the sake of the boys to stop mum stopping contact.

TheDaysAreGettingLongerAgain · 30/01/2026 23:47

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 30/01/2026 23:27

Because there’s a lot of bitter posters around who will jump on any opportunity to make the man and step mother the villains as clearly his first wife can do no wrong

Any man who abandons very young children to run off with another woman is a villain in my book.

LeftBoobGoneRogue · 30/01/2026 23:48

Londonrach1 · 30/01/2026 21:01

Why can't dh drive or is he learning or a medical condition. If not is there a a bus, train etc. he should be the one doing this not you

Did you actually read the thread? He can’t drive for medical reasons.

LeftBoobGoneRogue · 30/01/2026 23:51

@TheDaysAreGettingLongerAgainthe ex wife ran off with a colleague. The husband did not run off and leave his children.

Sashimiandhisthunderpaws · 30/01/2026 23:54

Their mum wants to reduce the boys' time with the dad from 2 x 66hrs per month to 2 x 24hrs. This will not affect the boys' travel time, but double the OP's. Neither set of parents will able to have a full weekend with the kids, limiting trips etc.

@ImthedriverSo Do the boys have any regular clubs on Fridays/Sundays that are paid for by the mum and they miss when they come for the full weekend? This is the only reason I could see for the change to 24hrs. Then she's decided she wants 1-1 with the boys hence separate visits. It could also be there's a activity she wants to to weekly with both boys that only have sessions Sunday afternoon.

If they're in a football team they could be missing training and matches every other weekend, affecting they're progress and position in the team. A girl that was at her Dad's EOW so wouldn't be available for many matches on my daughter's team. He lived 40 minutes away and lots of matches would be an hour away from us in the other direction. The coach wasn't particularly sympathetic and viewed this as unreliable and she would always start as a sub.

NotnowMildrid · 30/01/2026 23:56

She’s being very unreasonable imo.

I hope your DH manages to get it back on track for all of you.

Minortour · 30/01/2026 23:57

TheDaysAreGettingLongerAgain · 30/01/2026 23:47

Any man who abandons very young children to run off with another woman is a villain in my book.

Good job that's not what happened here then. The mum did that - do you have such wise words for her?

Climbingrosexx · 31/01/2026 00:02

Londonmummy66 · 30/01/2026 22:57

OP - I'm really sorry but no one on MN gets that people can have life long conditions that mean they can't drive (I do) and it pisses me off so much that people are quite happy to diss posters who are basically disabled for not being able to drive.

Totally agree with this. Like it's anyone else's business why someone doesn't drive. Clearly have no clue how it feels to be prevented from driving due to a medical condition. Really used to grate on me when people used to ask why I didn't learn to drive. I could bloody drive but lost my licence for medical reasons. I have it back now but reading comments like buy dh driving lessons/ why doesn't dh learn to drive/dh needs to learn to drive, I find the assumptions and ignorance is astounding!

Andouillette · 31/01/2026 00:02

ArtTheClownIsNotAMime · 30/01/2026 21:50

He's not only turning down two extra days but giving up the two he already has. He grabbed the opportunity to drop all time with both hands.

I wonder why he's never gone to court before? Oh yeah, because he's a shit father.

Edited

Do you have a reading comprehension problem?

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 31/01/2026 00:04

TheDaysAreGettingLongerAgain · 30/01/2026 23:47

Any man who abandons very young children to run off with another woman is a villain in my book.

If you bothered reading OP’s posts rather than making up your own version you’d see that’s not what happened here.

Jesus Christ, talk about twisting the story

Climbingrosexx · 31/01/2026 00:10

TheDaysAreGettingLongerAgain · 30/01/2026 23:47

Any man who abandons very young children to run off with another woman is a villain in my book.

What about a woman running off with another man? That's what happened here. She took the kids with her and is now taking even more time away from him by changing the Friday - Monday to Saturday- Sunday giving him 1 night with his kids instead of 3!

Andouillette · 31/01/2026 00:16

TheDaysAreGettingLongerAgain · 30/01/2026 23:47

Any man who abandons very young children to run off with another woman is a villain in my book.

He didn't, it was the ex who left with another man.

socialdilemmawhattodo · 31/01/2026 00:17

cadburyegg · 30/01/2026 17:42

What makes you say that? i’m a single mum with 2 kids the same age and my UC top is £170 a month. Hardly “handsomely supported”.

£500 is a decent amount of maintenance but EOW is still pitiful tbh.

But that is coming from tax payers the £170 per month PLUS your child benefit. So as a tax payer I am asking how you and the DC father intend to improve your earnings so that I as a tax payer don't have to fund that.

Thedownwardspiralpath · 31/01/2026 00:20

I’m not sure you will get the advise you want in here, as you can see, most will want to find a way to paint your husband as the bad guy.

BrokenWingsCantFly · 31/01/2026 00:23

TeenLifeMum · 30/01/2026 17:31

Your argument needs to be focused on what’s best for the dc rather than what’s most convenient for you. That said, I wouldn’t agree with splitting the dc - it’s important for them to stay together imo. She can’t argue with “that’s not in the best interests of the Dc”.

the fact you drive and dh can’t really isn’t the mum’s issue. And eow is bare minimum parenting. Throw in £250 a month per dc - bet the mum spends more than that on them.

Edited

What could she possibly spend more than £250 a month per child on?

So if she also contributed £250 a month on each child from her own personal funds does she spend more than £500 a month on each child? If not then even if they each cost her £400 a month (which they won't) the ex is paying more towards their keep. Ddt any benefits as that is the tax payer contributing to their keep and I doubt she contributs much at all. So don't see why you are demonising the OPs partner for what he pays.

Don't think OOW is enough though. The seperate thing is weird, but he should want to see them as much as possible

WaryHiker · 31/01/2026 00:30

SedatedSloth · 30/01/2026 17:51

Your DH should write to the mum saying that the current set up has worked for X years, you enjoy spending quality time with both boys at the same time, and the boys get on well together so it wouldn't be in their best interest to spend time apart each week, and therefore you would like to continue the current arrangement which works well.

I would then say that you you feel saddened that she is threatening you with no contact if you don't agree to what she want as that also wouldn't be in the best interest of the kids.

I would then say that as the happiness and stability of the boys needs to come first, that you will be carrying on with the samw arrangement.

Send with proof of postage and keep a copy.

If she cuts contact then I would consider taking it to court and going for full custody!

Moving an hour away when she knows your DH doesnt drive due to medical reasons was mean!

The OP doesn't want that. She thinks four days a month is lots and shows what a good parent her husband is!

WaryHiker · 31/01/2026 00:44

Summerhut2025 · 30/01/2026 19:31

Maybe that’s all the mother allows him to have them. She moved an hour away making seeing them during the week pretty impossible, that’s hardly his fault.

Apparently she only allows them a week in the summer holidays. Why has he not been to court years ago to insist on half of all their holidays spent at his? That's completely indefensible on his part.

Swipe left for the next trending thread