Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think throwing a mum-of-four in prison for having an abortion is never the answer?

1000 replies

therescoffeeinthatnebula · 12/06/2023 12:13

Spotted this on Twitter and haven't seen it already being discussed.

Apparently, a woman is being sentenced today for having an abortion over the limit during lockdown. I don't know of the circumstances (can't find anything other than the Sunday Times article), only that she already had four children and claims she didn't know exactly how far along she was.

I think most of us would agree making medical appointments during lockdown was bloody difficult and that it's even harder to attend any appointment if you have children, given you're not normally allowed to take them with you.

Whatever the truth, I'm appalled to see a woman potentially thrown in prison for trying to seek an abortion during lockdown, especially when you look at how violence against women is treated. I'd have thought referring her for mandatory counselling would be more of an appropriate outcome than prison because finding out you aborted what could have been a viable baby has got to mess with anyone's head.

It's all very sad - she should have been able to access proper services earlier - but prison, to me, should never have been on the table as a consequence.

I didn't actually realise that abortion in this country was blanket illegal and that our rights to seek abortions up to the limit are actually exceptions to that law rather than a piece of legislation that stands on its own.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Dacadactyl · 12/06/2023 21:15

Recoveringcynic · 12/06/2023 21:12

So you don't believe in equality for women, then? Right..... just how inferior do you think we are to men?

Women are in no way WHATSOEVER inferior to men. We are different to men. And we deserve better than abortion.

NatureNurture85 · 12/06/2023 21:15

BadNomad · 12/06/2023 20:45

I think the issue is is that what she did wasn't an abortion. The drugs she intentionally took were not made for a 34-week fetus. When you put a dog to sleep, you don't slowly poison it then wait for it to die. You end its life instantly, with dignity and respect. What this woman chose to do was to put her unborn baby through unnecessary suffering to end its life. Yes, every woman has the right to end unborn life, but what we don't have is the right to make that life suffer first.

But I do not think she knew this is what would happen to the fetus. I imagine she thought it would be just like having an abortion at ten weeks. Can people not see the desperate situation this poor woman was in.

StrawberryWasp · 12/06/2023 21:16

lysozyme · 12/06/2023 21:08

Multiple posters on this thread are very clearly anti-abortion.

Most are anti abortion after 24 weeks.

Not the same as anti abortion.

Recoveringcynic · 12/06/2023 21:16

Mary0nTheHandlebars · 12/06/2023 21:12

See my previous post I have explained myself twice.

Your complete faith in a man you have never met, based purely on press reports, is odd

Your portrayl of him as the victim in the whole sorry scenario is delusional.

All of your posts are dripping with judgement and misogyny.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 12/06/2023 21:16

StrawberryWasp · 12/06/2023 20:33

The law isn't just based on logic it's based on some fundamental principles of morality that we collectively agree and which have been informed by Judeo Christian teaching.

Different cultures base their laws on different principles.

Slavery is actually a good example. There's no logical reason it's wrong, it made huge sense for thousands of years which is why people did it.
We decided however that if we believe in that every individual has equal worth (which was a radical development in beliefs) it cannot be justified.
This is a moral not a logical belief.

Killing healthy viable babies is something you either believe is wrong or not.

There's no logical reason it's [slavery] wrong

And I'm criticised for my view point? JFC.

Slavery is wrong because it sucks to be the person who is the slave. Slavery is wrong because if person A can be enslaved, so can I, and I don't like that idea. It's simple application of the "sauce for the goose is good for the gander" principle.

Killing healthy viable babies is something you either believe is wrong or not.

Incorrect. The right of a baby, or anyone else, to life does not trump the right of any person to refuse to be used as a human incubator or other form of life support. I'm giving Judith Thomson's "violinist" argument here. That's Philosophy Professor Judith Thomson, for those of you who are accusing me of A-level arguments.

BadNomad · 12/06/2023 21:17

Babyboomtastic · 12/06/2023 21:09

Can someone please explain how the drugs would have caused her baby to die? From looking in Google, it seems that the standard combination (possibly with different amounts) can be used throughout pregnancy, but that if the unborn is 22w+ they inject it to kill it before labour to ensure its not born alive. Given how the gestation here, wouldn't the baby have been born alive? I'm confused.

We're unsure at this point. But the pills were taken over 3 days so it's possible the placenta separated early on which will have starved the baby of oxygen and caused her death.

lysozyme · 12/06/2023 21:18

StrawberryWasp · 12/06/2023 21:16

Most are anti abortion after 24 weeks.

Not the same as anti abortion.

My point still stands, there are posters on this thread who are anti-abortion

Recoveringcynic · 12/06/2023 21:19

Dacadactyl · 12/06/2023 21:15

Women are in no way WHATSOEVER inferior to men. We are different to men. And we deserve better than abortion.

But not equal then?

Not sure what could possibly be 'better' than an enhanced ability to control our bodies, which inherently bear almost all the risk of sexual activity where men bear none.

BadNomad · 12/06/2023 21:21

NatureNurture85 · 12/06/2023 21:15

But I do not think she knew this is what would happen to the fetus. I imagine she thought it would be just like having an abortion at ten weeks. Can people not see the desperate situation this poor woman was in.

It's sad, but it's still not ok. Just like how there have been women who panic and kill their babies after birth. It can't be seen to be ok because then others will think it's an option to consider.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 12/06/2023 21:22

StrawberryWasp · 12/06/2023 21:12

Babies aren't a punishment for sex they are a natural consequence.
If not wanted you can use contraception or get an early abortion.

You don't have a right to kill a baby after 24 weeks just because it is physically dependent on you. You are not being forced to birth, the natural process of pregnancy which now cannot be stopped because the baby has rights too.

The same argument is being made about puberty blockers and trans kids: they are being forced into puberty if not given blockers.

Not intervening to stop a natural process is not forcing a natural process.

It's also interesting how feminists on the trans issue also say that TRAs cannot see the clash of rights and insist only their rights matter, when on the abortion issue they (some) refuse to acknowledge the clash of rights here.

It's where ideological purity leads. When horrors can be committed in the name of your principle it's probably a good idea to maybe stop and think.

Puberty blockers are not comparable at all. Abortion is about not staying pregnant and is a well-understood medical procedure. Puberty blockers interfere with the development of a born child's body and are so poorly-understood as to be unlicensed for that use in the UK.

AfricanGrey · 12/06/2023 21:23

And we deserve better than abortion.

You personally never have to have an abortion. Nobody is saying you should.

But for many women it's a lifesaving, positive, realistic, practical way of helping them. Many women do not want children. They want to do other things with their lives.

Do you think other women should not be allowed to have abortions during the early legal period that they can access them?

user9630721458 · 12/06/2023 21:23

I don't think it's on that the agency gets off completely. They gave out the pills, they should bear some responsibility.

Mary0nTheHandlebars · 12/06/2023 21:23

Recoveringcynic · 12/06/2023 21:16

Your complete faith in a man you have never met, based purely on press reports, is odd

Your portrayl of him as the victim in the whole sorry scenario is delusional.

All of your posts are dripping with judgement and misogyny.

I would argue that the unfounded assumptions that the man is an abuser, with no evidence whatsoever bar the fact she concealed a pregnancy, are dripping with misandry.

The fact about there being three men coming to explains very clearly why she wanted to conceal the pregnancy and people are still intent on thinking badly of the man who had sod all to do with this and has done nothing wrong. Quite the opposite. He tried to save Lily's life.

Why would she move her and her kids in with him during lockdown if he was an abuser?

Christ. Why do you hate men so much?

daffodilandtulip · 12/06/2023 21:26

And yet my ex committed three potentially deadly attacks on me whilst I was pregnant and nothing could be done. Women will never be equal.

StrawberryWasp · 12/06/2023 21:27

Don't pretend moral outrage that I'm suggesting slavery is acceptable. You know I'm not so it's pathetic.

Your logical argument against slavery is based on very shallow moral reasoning at the level of power is might. We'll all agree not to do it in case it's me next type pact, rather than the actual reason that eventually overcame slavery which was the sacredness and essential equality of every human being.
That's not logic that's a belief in the nature of humans which is quite a modern belief.

Slavery existed for thousands of years because it made sense. Those with power would exploit those without it. Everyone basically accepted this was a natural, if unpleasant, order. Some people could be exploited if they were weak they were worth less.

The Germans had logic in the extermination camps.

You are dangerously naive if you think logic always leads to moral outcomes.

Dacadactyl · 12/06/2023 21:27

Recoveringcynic · 12/06/2023 21:19

But not equal then?

Not sure what could possibly be 'better' than an enhanced ability to control our bodies, which inherently bear almost all the risk of sexual activity where men bear none.

Yes, women are equal to men.

And yes, I agree women bear most of the risk of sexual activity. It doesn't follow to me that access to abortion levels things up though.

I think it lets men off the hook. The sexual revolution has not been good for women (or society) in my view.

Dacadactyl · 12/06/2023 21:28

AfricanGrey · 12/06/2023 21:23

And we deserve better than abortion.

You personally never have to have an abortion. Nobody is saying you should.

But for many women it's a lifesaving, positive, realistic, practical way of helping them. Many women do not want children. They want to do other things with their lives.

Do you think other women should not be allowed to have abortions during the early legal period that they can access them?

No, I don't think abortion should be legal.

nothingcomestonothing · 12/06/2023 21:30

StrawberryWasp · 12/06/2023 20:24

Well to be fair to @VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia you have your single ethical principle and you are prepared to see it logically through to a dystopian end, dismissing all competing moral questions with an extraordinary certainty in the primacy of this one position.

Often when people are arguing one entrenched position you can test it with some hypothetical question about how far they'd go with that and you try to imagine the worst thing ever like...I don't know, torturing babies to death...

But here, with you and your bodily autonomy absolutism you are still 'yep, even if it means horrible deaths for healthy babies.' when that is actually the reality. Even then, only bodily autonomy matters.

It does appear to me like a type of madness, when such inhumane acts can be justified with such logic, and when the undoubtedly painful deliberate killing of a healthy baby is dismissed as 'icky'

When most people think about what a 32 week fetus is like and then imagine it being deliberately slowly killed they feel revulsion and horror at something which we know is morally wrong at a deep level.
Describing that feeling as icky reveals mengele levels of justification for horror.

I really do think some women's rights advocates have lost their minds on this. Comparing pregnant women to corpses and babies to rapists. Sure, wank off with your sophistry on Mumsnet all night long, but 5 minutes of exposing this crap to the general public and you'd be done.

This is full of SPUC-style sentiment but short on facts.

'torturing babies to death'
'horrible deaths for healthy babies'
'undoubtedly painful deliberate killing'
'imagine it being deliberately slowly killed'

Has anyone on the thread advocated for any of those things? I haven't seen it, if they did. I don't believe we know if the baby breathed, or was conscious, I haven't seen that in the reports? No one deliberately tortured a baby. This woman made a horrible and extremely bad choice, I can only imagine how desperate you'd have to be to do what she did.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 12/06/2023 21:30

Dacadactyl · 12/06/2023 21:15

Women are in no way WHATSOEVER inferior to men. We are different to men. And we deserve better than abortion.

I'm autistic. I do not want, and would not be able to cope with, a child. I have also been raped twice.

Had either of my rapists impregnated me, what would you suggest for me? Bearing in mind that I would be enduring pregnancy symptoms whilst autistic and giving birth nine months after the trauma of a rape to a baby that I didn't want and can't to cope with.

Mary0nTheHandlebars · 12/06/2023 21:32

I can only imagine how desperate you'd have to be to do what she did.

There was never any need for it to reach the point of desperation. She could have had a safe, humane termination in 2019.

Recoveringcynic · 12/06/2023 21:32

Mary0nTheHandlebars · 12/06/2023 21:23

I would argue that the unfounded assumptions that the man is an abuser, with no evidence whatsoever bar the fact she concealed a pregnancy, are dripping with misandry.

The fact about there being three men coming to explains very clearly why she wanted to conceal the pregnancy and people are still intent on thinking badly of the man who had sod all to do with this and has done nothing wrong. Quite the opposite. He tried to save Lily's life.

Why would she move her and her kids in with him during lockdown if he was an abuser?

Christ. Why do you hate men so much?

If you read my earlier posts, you will see that I agree that all the suggestions that she was being abused were undermining the arguments being made.

A woman does not have to be perfectly virtuous or a victim to be able to access an abortion.

You know nothing of the real context to this whole scenario and neither do I. Nowhere have I ever mentioned hating men? It's really odd to take the side of a random man you don't know and your particular judgements of the woman involved are very specifically awful.

StrawberryWasp · 12/06/2023 21:32

nothingcomestonothing · 12/06/2023 21:30

This is full of SPUC-style sentiment but short on facts.

'torturing babies to death'
'horrible deaths for healthy babies'
'undoubtedly painful deliberate killing'
'imagine it being deliberately slowly killed'

Has anyone on the thread advocated for any of those things? I haven't seen it, if they did. I don't believe we know if the baby breathed, or was conscious, I haven't seen that in the reports? No one deliberately tortured a baby. This woman made a horrible and extremely bad choice, I can only imagine how desperate you'd have to be to do what she did.

Well I've been asking for information on how the baby died.
Seems maybe starved over days or suffocated?

I'd call that painful torture.

If you have evidence it was brief and painless, share, I've been asking.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 12/06/2023 21:33

StrawberryWasp · 12/06/2023 21:27

Don't pretend moral outrage that I'm suggesting slavery is acceptable. You know I'm not so it's pathetic.

Your logical argument against slavery is based on very shallow moral reasoning at the level of power is might. We'll all agree not to do it in case it's me next type pact, rather than the actual reason that eventually overcame slavery which was the sacredness and essential equality of every human being.
That's not logic that's a belief in the nature of humans which is quite a modern belief.

Slavery existed for thousands of years because it made sense. Those with power would exploit those without it. Everyone basically accepted this was a natural, if unpleasant, order. Some people could be exploited if they were weak they were worth less.

The Germans had logic in the extermination camps.

You are dangerously naive if you think logic always leads to moral outcomes.

"You are like me and what can be done to you can be done to me" is just another way of saying "we are all essentially equal". I'm not religious so "sacred" is meaningless to me.

Mary0nTheHandlebars · 12/06/2023 21:34

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 12/06/2023 21:30

I'm autistic. I do not want, and would not be able to cope with, a child. I have also been raped twice.

Had either of my rapists impregnated me, what would you suggest for me? Bearing in mind that I would be enduring pregnancy symptoms whilst autistic and giving birth nine months after the trauma of a rape to a baby that I didn't want and can't to cope with.

I know you didn't ask me but what I would recommend for you in those circumstances would be a safe, humane abortion professionally administered before the 24 week cut off period.

StrawberryWasp · 12/06/2023 21:35

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 12/06/2023 21:22

Puberty blockers are not comparable at all. Abortion is about not staying pregnant and is a well-understood medical procedure. Puberty blockers interfere with the development of a born child's body and are so poorly-understood as to be unlicensed for that use in the UK.

Both are medical interventions to stop natural biological processes.

If those interventions are not used the process isn't forced it just continues to naturally occur.

The teen doesn't want puberty.
The woman doesn't want a baby.

But neither are forced on them.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread