She doesn't move his hand, she goes to put her hand on top of his at the same time as he moves it away, so he puts it back for a second for her to complete that action, and then removes it again after she takes her hand off his. People are definitely reading stuff into it that is really isn't there.
This^^ - that is what happened, not unwanted groping or anything else. Her awkwardness was a cringe because she went to put her hand on top of his and he removed it before her hand got there. Then they awkwardly went through the whole thing again, she was a bit nervy and he was distracted and trying to rectify it but ended up making it worse (rectify the awkwardness of the misunderstanding about removing his hand too early that is). Rather like the awkward cringe you do if you are greeting someone with two kisses and you go for the wrong side.
Obviously any right minded decent person would not agree with or condone any kind of inappropriate behaviour, but WTF is the world coming to when we can't touch each other at all any more. There is a massive difference between the two and claiming one is the other just minimises the real abuse and assaults.
Can every woman screaming outrage on here honestly say you've never touched another person during a conversation or an anecdote in a social situation (without a consent form witnessed and signed in triplicate)? I can't believe the amount of MN'ers taking this DailyFail shite and running with it.