@BoredZelda
shouldn’t illegal immigrants (by which I don’t mean asylum seekers, but people who have overstayed visas or who have snuck in but not claimed asylum and are here illegally) be deported? Surely that is the purpose of having laws?
is it unreasonable to be concerned that young men who have been living in a country which is extremely brutalised and unbelievably misogynistic may not share the same values and may need, at the very least, some form of planned integration strategy?
is it unreasonable to query whether the asylum system is really working when you can pay a gang leader to come to Britain knowing that they are a criminal (it’s hardly a surprise is it? You wouldn’t need a small boat if it were legitimate!) and then claim that you are a victim of people smuggling and fear reprisals to stay? Or you can claim you are a victim of the Taliban, whether or not that is true and no one can check it?
is it unreasonable to query whether international laws that were designed at a time at which people smuggling was not really a thing and smartphones certainly were not are serving their original purpose, particularly when the limits of what counts as “oppression” or “family ties” have been stretched to quite a large extent beyond armed conflict etc that were originally in view?
Is it unreasonable to point out that 40 per cent of those claiming asylum are never expected to pay tax, so there is a genuine question around funding and integration?
these are difficult conversations and none of that requires us to be racist or claim immigrants are rapists, but I personally don’t see enough of them happening in a sensible mainstream forum.