Derailing slightly - well more of a branch line, as it is relevant to the thread topic:
Imagine if the category 'transgender child' did not exist, on the basis that while there are children who are gender-questioning, there are young people who are unsettled and distressed by puberty, there are girls who are in flight from being women in a deeply misogynistic society, there are boys who are in flight from the stereotypes of masculinity they see on social media -
they should be lovingly supported, but should not be labelled 'transgender'.
Transgender is an adult designation, an adult decision, an adult category that shouldn't be imposed on children and young people.
If 'transgender child' was not a category used in educational settings, there would be no need for this disruptive debate about boys using the girls' facilities, and vice versa.
And I'm just guessing here, but if there was no accepted category 'transgender child' which brought with it lots of attention and special treatment in schools, it might be less attractive...