"Male on male rape is talked about by the media and is taken much more seriously than the rape of women or girls."
😄Based on absolutely nothing whatsoever. Odd then that most domestic abuse and rape subjects are mostly dedicated to women. But you seem to think that something being more common makes less common things unimportant. "Women get raped more!"
"Women cant rape anyone so there's no women on women rape to report and the vanishingly rare cases of women sexually assaulting women are reported its just so rare that you probably missed it"
I think it's fine to call women rapists. I'm aware of the stupid definition change, but it's wrong. Most people in general aren't rapists, but you don't have to be so dismissive about it just because you're biased against female predators getting attention.
"Any man however he identifies who enters a female single sex facilitie is a predator who is intentionally braking the law and social convention that is a fact whether you like it or not."
Explain to me how a man is a predator if he walks into the toilet, uses the toilet, washes his hands and leaves. None of that is predatory. You can disapprove of him being there as much as you want, and it could be as illegal as you want, but factually speaking, it doesn't make him a predator, it means he's broken the law, quite a difference. He would have to assault someone, or at the very least spy on or harass someone in order to be considered a predator. How is a gay man a predator against women, if he has no interest in them and says/does nothing to them. You're not a serious person.
Do you view women and doctors as killers of unborn babies if it happens in a country where it's unlawful/illegal? Do you judge them just as harshly purely based on the legal status? Or do you make an exception because it's something you might be biased about? Just wondering how much you actually believe what you're saying.