This is really concerning:
“April 2025 – weaponising the Supreme Court
In April 2025, Sex Matters, Transgender Trend, and LGB Alliance sent a joint letter to Wes Streeting and NHS England’s Sir James Mackey. They demanded cancellation of the planned puberty blocker trial.
Their justification? The Supreme Court ruling in For Women Scotland v Scottish Ministers. They claimed the judgment meant children “must now be told they will never be able to access spaces or services for the opposite sex”.
They declared: “This means that the entire premise of treatment with puberty blockers for gender dysphoria has fallen away”. They concluded that medical treatment was now “ethically untenable.”
This is a grotesque distortion of the ruling. The Supreme Court did not ban healthcare. Yet anti-rights hate groups weaponised it to argue that transition care for young people must be scrapped entirely.”
This is a remarkable claim. And we have seen it before. Is the misunderstanding deliberate?
It is very clear what SM was talking about. If someone can no longer access the opposite sex single sex provisions, as per the SC judgement, this needs to be made very clear to any young person or child undergoing treatment. That they will need to access alternative provisions or their own sex single sex provisions for the rest of their life. They cannot assume they can use the sex they have declared they are when they are not materially that sex.