He does the usual TRA thing of pretending that objections to men in women's toilets is purely on the basis that they might attack women. And in which case, that's a crime, so he just dismisses it as completely unconnected to trans ideology.
He says, if a man dresses up as a woman, enters a woman's toilet, and attacks her it's a crime. Emphasises that it's a crime.
And goes on to polish his pretence of defending women by saying it is 'horrible, inexcusable, unforgivable'.
Well, now the supreme Court has said that a transwomen even entering a woman's toilet is considered unlawful. Is that going to be horrible, inexcusable and unforgivable too?
Or is it that completely different?
Disguising your misogyny as comedy doesn't make less misogynistic.