Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #39

1000 replies

nauticant · 23/07/2025 14:23

Sandie Peggie, a nurse at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy (VH), has brought claims in the employment tribunal against her employer; Fife Health Board (the Board) and another employee, Dr B Upton. Ms Peggie’s claims are of sexual harassment, harassment related to a protected belief, indirect discrimination and victimisation. Dr Upton claims to be a transwoman, that is observed as male at birth but asserting a female gender identity.

The Employment Tribunal hearing started on Monday 3 February 2025 and was expected to last 2 weeks. However, after 2 weeks it was not complete and it adjourned part-heard. It resumed on 16 July and the last day of evidence will be 28 July and then there will be 2 days of submissions from counsel meaning that the hearing will end on 30 July.

The hearing commenced with Sandie Peggie giving evidence. Dr Beth Upton gave evidence from Thursday 6 February to Wednesday 12 February.
Access to view the hearing remotely was obtainable by sending an email request to [email protected] by 5pm on Wednesday 9 July. Detailed instructions were provided here:

drive.google.com/file/d/16-9POEZ7yHWUr6EmbfquJZO18Gv78bSm/view

The hearing is being live tweeted by x.com/tribunaltweets and there's additional information here: tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-005 and tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-bd6. This also has threadreaderapp archives of live-tweeting of the sessions of the hearing for those who can't follow on Twitter, for example: archive.ph/WSSjg.

An alternative to Twitter is to use Nitter: nitter.net/tribunaltweets or nitter.poast.org/tribunaltweets

Links to previous threads #1 to #29 can be found in the header of thread #30.

Thread 30: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5375337-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-30
Thread 31: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5375819-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-31
Thread 32: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5376072-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-32
Thread 33: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5376608-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-33
Thread 34: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5377387-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-34
Thread 35: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5377598-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-35
Thread 36 mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5378031-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-36
Thread 37: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5378200-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-37
Thread 38: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5378463-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-38

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
KnottyAuty · 23/07/2025 21:50

Tweakie123 · 23/07/2025 21:19

Great spot. If its not picked up on when the witness is there, would contradictions like this likely be addressed in closing?

SP and DU had different stories about what happened and where each was standing in the CR from Part 1. SP said DU changed clothes in front of her. DU says not and claims SP spoke to him after he’d changed and was coming out of the WC cubicle. Questions by the panel cast a tiny bit of doubt on DU’s version.

So I found it really odd that today KS was so definite about who said what, when, where & how when DU sounded less certain than her?! It just made me think that she’d swallowed the story hook, line & sinker. Then she’d gone full bore after that - while DU was much more clever when giving evidence. More nuance and subtlety. Someone said sophistry at the time. I reckon DU implied lots of things and then KS told everyone what wasn’t explicitly stated - and is now in a bit of bother for that…

GetDressedYouMerryGentlemen · 23/07/2025 21:50

Notfinanciallyresponsibleforyou · 23/07/2025 21:37

Oh how lovely! They are jealous of our camaraderie and recipe tips. I bet they keep peeking for fashion and beauty chat.

Do they want a recipe for celeriac and pear soup?

Edited

They are waiting for us to start pillow fighting in our undies. For some reason they seem to think we do this all the time but are big nasty meanies for not letting them join in.

nauticant · 23/07/2025 21:51

Continuation thread:

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5378996-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-40

(Spot the deliberate mistake!)

OP posts:
abracabarbara · 23/07/2025 21:52

FannyCann · 23/07/2025 21:47

I went to the hospital library today to do some e-learning. They had a table with all the day's newspapers, so of course I picked up a copy of The Times to pass the time while the computer fired up and logged me in. I may have missed it but I didn't see a single article about the SP trial.
I know there have been some good articles in the Times, but maybe not all make it into the print version? So it's probably quite easy to miss out on the news about this, especially as we are all invested and looking for it.

The Times articles will be in the Scotland print edition.
So if you are in rUK you wont get those pages.

Even online you have to hunt for the articles buried deep within the Scotland section. (only a few make it to the online front page)

ifIwerenotanandroid · 23/07/2025 21:54

GetDressedYouMerryGentlemen · 23/07/2025 21:50

They are waiting for us to start pillow fighting in our undies. For some reason they seem to think we do this all the time but are big nasty meanies for not letting them join in.

That's on the other thread. 😜 They'll never find it.

misscockerspaniel · 23/07/2025 21:56

A very late start "tomorrow" 😉 Edited - today not tomorrow!

MillieMoggie · 23/07/2025 21:58

ThatsALeafJean · 23/07/2025 21:48

I think that if I delete an email, it goes into the Deleted Items folder - then that’s what is emptied / deleted after 30 days. But not emails in my inbox
(I have nhs.scot email account)

Not where I work - central government. My deleted items folder still contains emails going back years. I can delete them, which means they are permanently deleted as soon as I do, but my organisation doesn't do this until we are approaching GDPR retention limits. Deleting emails after 30 days from wherever sounds like a logistical nightmare.

GrumpyUngulate · 23/07/2025 21:59

This thread is for Sandie, and we're all delighted that her case is going so well.

But if you get a spare moment, congratulations are also due for Dr Peter Wilkins. He was harassed and vilified by the Defence Science & Technology Dept for his very reasonable, measured beliefs, driven to resignation. The complacent malice of DSTL senior management is breathtaking. The judgment upholding his ET claim is a joy to read, and very encouraging for Sandie. Tribunals understand the post-Forstater landscape, they're not accepting bullying of sex realist beliefs anymore.

Maya's commentary -
https://x.com/MForstater/status/1947730180489023877

Direct link to judgement -
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/687e55f188c74f0fd15c96d5/Dr_P_Wilkins_v_Defence_Science_and_Technology_Laboratory_-6000548.2023-_Reserved_Judgment.pdf

https://x.com/MForstater/status/1947730180489023877

ThatCyanCat · 23/07/2025 21:59

ifIwerenotanandroid · 23/07/2025 21:54

That's on the other thread. 😜 They'll never find it.

If only men would ask for directions.

NHSFifeStatementFinalFINALFinalVersionV9FINAL · 23/07/2025 22:00

@ReasonedJudgement thanks for your post - really interesting. I would be terrible at trying to track, in a work environment , who said what to whom and when and who was privy to what information, who directed whom to do xyz... I'm amazed and glad that people are skilled enough to do it so painstakingly.

SerafinasGoose · 23/07/2025 22:00

Notfinanciallyresponsibleforyou · 23/07/2025 21:44

A bedtime giggle

https://x.com/coldcoffee23567/status/1948107997668126783

a response to JR calling Sandie Peggie "Miss Piggy"

Edited

I read that somewhere but didn't comment as it was unverified.

But if JR really did say this - a KC supposedly expected to uphold the standards of her profession - surely she should face some form of professional sanction for that conduct?

That said, I've seen something of the way Bar Standards operate - not least what some of them do when out on the lash ...

Ereshkigalangcleg · 23/07/2025 22:02

NebulousSupportPostcard · 23/07/2025 18:38

That’s a lovely photo of Sandie and her mum ❤️

GrumpyUngulate · 23/07/2025 22:04

MillieMoggie · 23/07/2025 21:58

Not where I work - central government. My deleted items folder still contains emails going back years. I can delete them, which means they are permanently deleted as soon as I do, but my organisation doesn't do this until we are approaching GDPR retention limits. Deleting emails after 30 days from wherever sounds like a logistical nightmare.

In my last public sector employer, all emails were permanently archived for organisational defensibility. Deleting from the live Outlook system didn't do anything to the archive copy. I would be extremely surprised if NHS didn't have some tamperproof system in place to keep archives for a minimum of 5yrs. Wonder what the Fife IT witness will have to say about Searle's claims...?

Bannedontherun · 23/07/2025 22:05

Am on page 27 so unlikely to catch up until bedtime.

Just wanted to say, Consultants are only big cheeses in the context of the front line service.

They are not however, very high up the food chain.

I think she is an absolute and utter snivelling lying wretch

And demonstrated her wretchedness for all to see.

Why? Love? Nah.

There was something going on here that we probably will never know about.

My DH likened it to some type of Masonic network who can make or break you.

She busied herself about the place trying to help Upton, not knowing anything as the second investigation was underway.

She cried in the witness chair

She cried allegedly in (the female) loos for 8 minutes

she cried because she realised she was being played, by the Masonic Guild of GI.

And powers and networks way above her, who whatever they offered her, today went up in a puff of smoke.

KnottyAuty · 23/07/2025 22:06

SerafinasGoose · 23/07/2025 22:00

I read that somewhere but didn't comment as it was unverified.

But if JR really did say this - a KC supposedly expected to uphold the standards of her profession - surely she should face some form of professional sanction for that conduct?

That said, I've seen something of the way Bar Standards operate - not least what some of them do when out on the lash ...

It was a slip
JR also repeatedly misgendered Upton even when directly addressing her client
This week she referred to Isla Bumba mistakenly as Isla Bryson
It’s not a good look - but does show that it’s impossible to keep up the pretence even if someone really really wants to

BettyBooper · 23/07/2025 22:07

AnnaMagnani · 23/07/2025 21:40

Personal experience of prep for an inquest - a proper one with a jury and serious risk to the trust

Email goes out asking everyone to check their emails for anything relevant.
Nobody bothers.
Years go by waiting for the hearing.
All emails deleted by this point.

Except for one very assiduous nurse who not only kept all her relevant emails, she also sat and read the whole bundle and pointed out the key evidence hidden away on page 1598 to our barrister and legal team, who hadn't noticed it.

So sadly I think this is probably typical of how the NHS prepares for any type of court case.

But that's why it should go to IT to look at. Was your organisation one that had responsibility for retaining data? Those that do archive everything.

You can't on the one hand be responsible for FOI requests and on the other delete everything after 6 months.

Notfinanciallyresponsibleforyou · 23/07/2025 22:08

Is there any more on the NHS Fife statement (1 to xxx)? Would love to know how that is playing out for them 😂

Boiledbeetle · 23/07/2025 22:09

Lins77 · 23/07/2025 17:53

I've given evidence to an NMC disciplinary hearing (not mine!) and was basically accused by the RCN representative of lying and embellishing (I wasn't). Can't say bursting into tears would have helped, but I didn't really consider it.

I nearly cried in my tribunal but instead froze! The judge asked me a question, And I just sat there like a deer in headlights. The judge sat there looking at me and all I could focus on was her pile of ironing behind her (lockdown zoom tribunal). In the end she very nicely said my barrister could answer for me. I couldn't even have told you my name at that point!

GetDressedYouMerryGentlemen · 23/07/2025 22:09

GrumpyUngulate · 23/07/2025 22:04

In my last public sector employer, all emails were permanently archived for organisational defensibility. Deleting from the live Outlook system didn't do anything to the archive copy. I would be extremely surprised if NHS didn't have some tamperproof system in place to keep archives for a minimum of 5yrs. Wonder what the Fife IT witness will have to say about Searle's claims...?

All of my emails are automatically deleted after 3 months, apart from the one that aren't, which coincidentally aren't the ones that look like this 💨🔫 🩸🔪

KnottyAuty · 23/07/2025 22:10

ReasonedJudgement · 23/07/2025 21:16

Namechanged for this - I am a Judge in a different Tribunal and thought I would comment on a few comments/questions people have - note I am not watching this Tribunal live and won't be commenting on any specifics within it.

Stenographers - I am not an expert in the different types but I have had two types. The 'old fashioned' version where one stenographer is at the machine where you push multiple buttons at one, and someone else next to them and corrects the typescript as they go, and the more 'automated' version where the stenographer has headphones and watches as the computer does the speech to text bit, and the stenographer corrects that as it goes along.

The judge generally gets the transcript at the end of the day but even with stenographers I prefer to take a lot down longhand for three reasons. Firstly so I have it instantly available if I want to read it in any break in preparation for asking the witness questions. Secondly because I find it easier to skim read than a transcript, because the transcript is generally provided double spaced which I find harder to skim, and because the transcript adds in everything - every um, err, repetition etc which is harder to skim read than my notes, and thirdly because I can also scribble relevant notes as I go along in relation to what someone is saying, and then go back and see if I need to ask a question about that or if it has been covered later on. A transcript is however brilliant for searching on an individual word when you are writing up.
You need permission for transcribers to be present in court because it affects the size of the court room you need. If the hearing is in a format where it is recorded (and not all are) then you can also pay for a transcript later from the audio file. You can find more details about this including costs here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/order-a-transcript-of-court-or-tribunal-proceedings-form-ex107/guidance-for-requesting-a-transcript#employment-tribunal-judgments

What the panel is deciding - It is important to understand that what is being decided is not 'did this person break the law/how does the law apply to this case' It is 'did this person break this law/how does this law apply to this case'. In other words, everything needs to be broadly set out by the claimant in advance. And if something else comes to light that is in relation to a different law entirely, the judge won't make a finding in relation to that. For example, if in the course of an employment tribunal it somehow became obvious that someone hadn't filed a tax return when they should have done, that wouldn't be a matter that the judge would make a decision about.
Each of the barristers/representatives/advocates is painting a picture, using agreed facts, contested facts, and the law, as to what the situation is. The panel's job is firstly to decide what is the fact of any contested matter, which facts are relevant and which are irrelevant, what is the relevant law (which may or may not be agreed) and how to apply the relevant facts to the relevant law. This is really important because once the first instance Tribunal has found the facts, it is very difficult to appeal the findings of fact to a higher court. The appeal courts generally only hear appeals on matters of law.

I have done judicial diversity training in the past year and I thought it was very good. It covered a very wide range of different types of diversity and there was nothing it it I think a person with gender critical views would object to.

Thanks - very reassuring to know about the training being even handed.

After Part 1 I looked up the Bench Book trying to understand what was going on. I was very struck by the huge swathe of text in the Transgender section. It seems disproportionate compared to all the other headings. I hope balance is returning.

CapabilityBrownsHaHa · 23/07/2025 22:11

I have to keep reminding myself that NMC on this board is not Not My Cat. Although trying to give one of them a disciplinary would be amusing.

sillygoof · 23/07/2025 22:14

Is the ‘sex is assigned at birth’ belief common among doctors through the country? It’s terrifying

MillieMoggie · 23/07/2025 22:16

GrumpyUngulate · 23/07/2025 22:04

In my last public sector employer, all emails were permanently archived for organisational defensibility. Deleting from the live Outlook system didn't do anything to the archive copy. I would be extremely surprised if NHS didn't have some tamperproof system in place to keep archives for a minimum of 5yrs. Wonder what the Fife IT witness will have to say about Searle's claims...?

Yep. The organisation I worked for was heavily involved in the pandemic so we were not allowed to delete anything at all incase it might be needed to be provided for the Covid Inquiry. Surely NHS Fife would be in the same boat? As an A&E Consultant surely she would have needed to retain emails regarding working during the pandemic, availability of PPE, health and welfare of staff etc? This is not plausible.

Joboomer · 23/07/2025 22:17

GetDressedYouMerryGentlemen · 23/07/2025 21:50

They are waiting for us to start pillow fighting in our undies. For some reason they seem to think we do this all the time but are big nasty meanies for not letting them join in.

LOL. Some of us might have been trying on clothes after a shopping trip.

Binglebong · 23/07/2025 22:19

FannyCann · 23/07/2025 19:07

I don't understand that. It's certainly not my experience either with NHS email or my personal. I've got tons of emails going back years. And 30 days is definitely too short for professional/nhs emails.
Anything ongoing like this she should have a specific folder for to enable back reference and checking chronology.

Maybe it's an optional setting she's chosen?? Seems bizarre to me.

I'm currently NHS adjacent. Similar thing, can't just access older than 30days, although I'm sure IT could track them down.

Talking about the different trusts - i am working with one trust that has several hospitals. They all have their own version of a single form - it's mad! Standardisation really is needed.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread