I'm sure someone has said this already, in the X billion pages of comments, but anyway...
What is with all the reference to "sobbing" and "distress", as though that has relevance to anything? I am not a sobber, and rarely cry at anything, certainly not work shite. IMO it's pretty unprofessional actually to sob at work, unless someone is dead. On the other hand, I might swear and rant - this would also be unprofessional, and in order to avoid swearing and ranting in a difficult situation I tend not to say anything, and prepare in my head a better response to use later.
Yet certain people in the tribunal, and on this thread (not naming names but I'm sure you know who) seem to think that DU's sobbing proves that he's the victim here.
Incidentally, I've also seen news reports saying that SP was in fact distressed and expressed this out of work. So a) perhaps she was distressed after all, b) maybe she is too professional to show it in work, or c) no-one knew she was distressed because no bugger actually talked to her about it.