From TT
NC - see all consultant email 29th dec, MC responds a few minutes later, to all ED consultants you say
NC - sketch of incident, DU reaction, you all support him and condemn SP. We see MC response 30th dec, thanks you for proactive and decisive and offering support on behalf of all.
NC continues
I suggest you have put on an exemplary display of piety and virtue and MC trying to associate scrambling, positively ingratiating. Agree?
KS - disagree
NC - 756 surinder panthar (?) also approves sentiment
KS - he agrees yes
NC - a successful move for you in terms of status in dept
KS - disagree
NC - apart from Melvin email that's it, aware of any others?
KS - no
NC - sent to 19 seniors, all support and condemnation of sandie, no one else responds?
KS - i didn't receive any other responses N
C - usual rules don't apply to DU do they
KS - i don't agree
Things seem to be getting to the end here. The Ring is ready to act. Six beads of green, two of violet. The code is unknown, perhaps it's beyond human comprehension entirely. Whatever ungodly computational matrix it is behoven to, we may never know, its machinations forever an unanswered mystery.
Or it might just be a Fitbit.
NC - ??? - email 3rd jan to DU just an update JD now involved and wanted me to pass on support. WHoly inappropriate when doing ix?
KS - in hindsight, yes
NC - 258 - email from melvin c of 7th jan, cc'd to same group, thanks for making aware kate, now being investigated. Looks like he's trying to shut down conv.
KS - don't know
NC - its flat
KS - could infer
NC - not stated is it
KS - no
NC - you would have mentioned if you'd been told to shut it down - whole truth?
KS - I would have
NC - you aren't subject ot any disciplinary proceedings because of that email?
KS - no
The Ring disagrees.
NC - AG 18th ap to you - meeting invite saying speaking to you first before DU. Woudn't be appropriate for you to be there when DU interviewed
KS - if you say
Fifer : the backchat has been pit at a peep noo. It's like when ye dae yer first PT in the Airmy. The PTI sets aff at a decent pace. Ye think ye can keep up. And ye can, for aboot 10 minutes ye think 'airmy, piece o doddle, completed it mate'. But he keeps gaun. An gaun. An gaun. Yer lungs are burnin, and ye realise : he can dae this aw day. This is his job. Yer in his hoose noo. There's nae end tae it. That's whit Dr Searle feels like. Wid be ma guess, ken.
NC - mitigate by speaking to you first
KS - that's what AG says.
NC - it's what you want and AG indulges
JR - not what it says, no rules
NC - it's a pattern for DU (for normal process not to be followed - missed exact wording)
NC - this is your invitation to meeting, avoid talking to anyone else, other than rep, take it seriously?
KS - yes
NC - did you then confess to AG you left confidentiatlity in ruins
Fifer : eh ah think this is ane o thae questions ye widnae like tae receive.
NC - sending email, passing message from JD etc
KS - i didn't
NC - did you not understand?
KS - didn't action
NC - talking to witness that upset you a flagrant breech?
KS - in hindsight yes
Fifer : aye buck'n hindsight is 20/20 eh. Nae scores here tho. At least no fur the Doctor.
I'm here aw week, tip the waitress, try the smokie.
NC - Can you tell us about that chat with HR?
KS - no its AG ref'ing to DU
NC - saying complainant should speak to you first?
KS - I am her supervisor, close on this incident, my part as a witness is only I'm who she reported to. I was offering well being support to beth.
NC - metadata of doc formal complaint made on 31st dec
Fifer : if there's a word that wid gie ye the cauld fear, it's got tae be 'METADATA'. Sake min, I'm gettin feart masel.