Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #36

1000 replies

nauticant · 22/07/2025 10:21

Sandie Peggie, a nurse at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy (VH), has brought claims in the employment tribunal against her employer; Fife Health Board (the Board) and another employee, Dr B Upton. Ms Peggie’s claims are of sexual harassment, harassment related to a protected belief, indirect discrimination and victimisation. Dr Upton claims to be a transwoman, that is observed as male at birth but asserting a female gender identity.

The Employment Tribunal hearing started on Monday 3 February 2025 and was expected to last 2 weeks. However, after 2 weeks it was not complete and it adjourned part-heard. It resumed on 16 July and the last day of evidence will be 28 July and then there will be 2 days of submissions from counsel meaning that the hearing will end on 30 July.

The hearing commenced with Sandie Peggie giving evidence. Dr Beth Upton gave evidence from Thursday 6 February to Wednesday 12 February.

Access to view the hearing remotely was obtainable by sending an email request to [email protected] by 5pm on Wednesday 9 July. Detailed instructions were provided here:

drive.google.com/file/d/16-9POEZ7yHWUr6EmbfquJZO18Gv78bSm/view

The hearing is being live tweeted by x.com/tribunaltweets and there's additional information here: tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-005 and tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr-bd6. This also has threadreaderapp archives of live-tweeting of the sessions of the hearing for those who can't follow on Twitter, for example: archive.ph/WSSjg.

An alternative to Twitter is to use Nitter: nitter.net/tribunaltweets or nitter.poast.org/tribunaltweets

Links to previous threads #1 to #29 can be found in the header of thread #30.

Thread 30: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5375337-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-30
Thread 31: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5375819-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-31
Thread 32: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5376072-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-32
Thread 33: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5376608-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-33
Thread 34: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5377387-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-34
Thread 35: mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5377598-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-35

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
Ereshkigalangcleg · 22/07/2025 15:39

if that’s the language she used “you can’t prove” it makes her sound guilty as hell!

prh47bridge · 22/07/2025 15:39

BezMills · 22/07/2025 15:33

From TT

KS You don't know that for sure. It cld have been deleted. These ppl are in the cc box and not the to box. I wonder if someone has relied, deleted and then cc-ed? Otherwise e'one wld be in the to box.
NC They're the same ppl, except DU was added in in Jan. You can understand why ppl wldnt have wanted this email see the light of day?
KS I cant belive we wld have held back emails

THREE GREENS show on NC's ring, one further light remains yellow-green.

NC The 5 Jan email is seriously embarrasing to the Rs. It talks about the Ix, and how ED will be the investigator, it appears to be to set and coordinate a group of ppl who shldnt be talking to each other as witnesses. It talks about info not leaving the group and foot in mouth syndrome. it's serious isnt it?

The ring didn't need an answer. At the end of 'isn't it' the fourth light switches to steady green.

"It could have been deleted" is not an excuse. This is why organisations keep an archive of emails. It is also why Outlook never actually deletes stuff - it moves it into your Deleted Items folder then, a few months later, archives it. And it smacks of, "I thought this one was too incriminating so I deleted it and hoped no-one would notice". KS is even deeper in the shit than everyone thought.

ButtSurgery · 22/07/2025 15:39
explosion GIF

NHS Fife. House of cards.

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 22/07/2025 15:39

So 6 people could have produced the email and not one did.

Seems fishy. 🤔

Shortshriftandlethal · 22/07/2025 15:39

KS identifies as 'honest and with integrity'. We must all beiieve her and trust her as she's a doctor.

ThatCyanCat · 22/07/2025 15:39

Jimmyneutronsforehead · 22/07/2025 15:37

There was a particular poster earlier on who said that they would be reporting posts because their TRA posts kept getting reported.

FWIW I read your post and thought it was extremely eloquent and can't understand how it breached any talk guidelines.

That doesn't explain why MNHQ deleted it though. I read it and didn't see anything against guidelines.

CriticalCondition · 22/07/2025 15:40

Ereshkigalangcleg · 22/07/2025 15:39

if that’s the language she used “you can’t prove” it makes her sound guilty as hell!

That's exactly what she said.

Jimmyneutronsforehead · 22/07/2025 15:40

ickky · 22/07/2025 15:36

NC all 6 in the group agreed not to disclose this email chain. 😱

Bit different to accidentally omitting a file isn't it

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 22/07/2025 15:40

MarieDeGournay · 22/07/2025 15:36

NC I suggest u conspired not to produce it
KS Absolutely not. I'm a dr and trustworthy.

comment superfluous!

Naomi is on fire!!

GreenFriedTomato · 22/07/2025 15:40

It seems it's finally dawning on her that Upton has lied and made up things about her.

Lunde · 22/07/2025 15:40

Don't you just hate it when 6 people "forget" to disclose a highly incriminating e-mail chain? 🙄🙄🙄

Pluvia · 22/07/2025 15:40

Here we go:
NC & after DU added, so 6 of you cld have found this info?
KS I'm not a legal expert and cant say. Not all were involved throughout. I dont know who was involved when
NC U knew LC was involves as y'd discussed the HI
NC Did u all agree not to produce it
KS NO

Conspiracy to hide evidence.

RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 22/07/2025 15:40

Trying to blame IB and HR/legal now.

NebulousSupportPostcard · 22/07/2025 15:40

oh dear

MarieDeGournay · 22/07/2025 15:41

KS I didnt instruct Dr Upton. I checked she was ok to use the F CR

So it looks like KS was the first to bring it up, asking if she was 'ok' to use it. Certainly not DU asking if it was OK!

InvisibleDragon · 22/07/2025 15:41

"There are 6 of you in the thread" has echoes of Tinker, Taylor - four of them and Alkaline.

Bets on who the 6 are? I'm going for:
KS, Ed, LC, GM, someone unnamed from HR and (wildcard) JD.

RedToothBrush · 22/07/2025 15:41

MarieDeGournay · 22/07/2025 15:36

NC I suggest u conspired not to produce it
KS Absolutely not. I'm a dr and trustworthy.

comment superfluous!

The Omerta Code of Doctors where they are all trustworthy but agree not to tell anyone else in order to Destroy the Enemy of Gender Critical Nurses in a valient and noble deed to protect the Trans Doctor.

Fucking Hell.

ickky · 22/07/2025 15:41

KS I emailed IB as she is much MORE expert than me.

So KS thinks she is an expert!

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 22/07/2025 15:42

GreenFriedTomato · 22/07/2025 15:40

It seems it's finally dawning on her that Upton has lied and made up things about her.

How long will it take her to realise that he doesn't 'have her back'?

HalfWomanHalfHobnob · 22/07/2025 15:42

OMG "If you Google it" from KS... you do know you're talking to Naomi Fucking Cunningham???

NebulousSupportPostcard · 22/07/2025 15:42

oh god

Kate is AFAB

BeLemonNow · 22/07/2025 15:42

Obviously TRA posts will only be deleted if they breach the Talk Guidelines. Usually personal attacks.

Largesso · 22/07/2025 15:42

Shortshriftandlethal · 22/07/2025 15:39

KS identifies as 'honest and with integrity'. We must all beiieve her and trust her as she's a doctor.

It’s that God like position isn’t it — my actions can’t be questioned because I am God a doctor.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 22/07/2025 15:42

InvisibleDragon · 22/07/2025 15:41

"There are 6 of you in the thread" has echoes of Tinker, Taylor - four of them and Alkaline.

Bets on who the 6 are? I'm going for:
KS, Ed, LC, GM, someone unnamed from HR and (wildcard) JD.

Very plausible re JD.

Lunde · 22/07/2025 15:42

Shortshriftandlethal · 22/07/2025 15:39

KS identifies as 'honest and with integrity'. We must all beiieve her and trust her as she's a doctor.

"Trust me - I'm a doctor"

.... and don't trust the witch SP

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread