Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Violent trans rights protest in Manchester.

190 replies

GreenFriedTomato · 02/07/2025 17:42

This happened 2 weeks ago but I only found out about it when Mr.Menno uploaded a video yesterday.
A few local YouTubers were there and got plenty of footage. Notably they were all quite shocked at how aggressive the TRA's were. Well the ones who weren't familiar with the way they operate.
They didn't just stick to marching through the streets. They invaded the Arndale Centre and marched shouting and swearing while rather bemused looking people were shopping and trying to enjoy their day.
Things turned violent as usual. Two young lesbians got punched and dragged to the floor.
I've linked to a video by Billy Moore who generally goes around filming the city and talking to homeless people and so on. It's quite long but the trans stuff starts around the 15 minute.mark if anyone's interested.

So ironic to see allies bleating on about how trans are the most marginalised and vulnerable and have had their dignity and rights taken away, while the delicate flowers are being filmed acting violently and attacking women (and men).

But carry on lads. People need to see more of this.

OP posts:
GreenFriedTomato · 04/07/2025 08:16

@Helleofabore that is pretty much what I wanted/have been trying to say but you have put it clearly. Thank you

OP posts:
Helleofabore · 04/07/2025 08:18

RedToothBrush · 04/07/2025 08:08

I think we should discuss these points cos it's relevant and I do see obvious issues starting to arise. The 'both sides' argument raises its ugly head unfortunately.

The ones who simply record the event giving commentary as they go, seem inevitably to be provocative just by being there.

This is the sense I get tbh. The people there can hear the editorial line straight away.

Position in the crowds is also another issue. Having a camera up close is different from filming from a wider angle. Regardless of intention it can create a sense of intimidation.

I think we are going to get more issues with this in future on a range of issues.

I think we are getting a range of issues now. I agree.

However, there really is a difference between someone who is standing back but using zoom functions and recording and someone who is in people’s personal space. Those who are deliberately up close can be said to be there provoking reaction vs those who are recording but are then brigaded.

In saying all that though, again the differences in reaction when one of these auditors is close up to the women who are there to listen and speak about women’s rights still don’t react in the same way as those aggressive protestors. The difference is remarkable. And it is consistent.

GreenFriedTomato · 04/07/2025 08:25

Exactly. There is a youtuber from Nottingham who was invited by LWS to view and film their event. They wanted it to be recorded and engage with him. He really didn't have a clue and ended up approaching the TRA side by mistake.
As soon as they realised he wasn't one of them (he wasn't against either, he was completely neutral as he didn't even know anything about either protest - just that it was 'something about rights') they turned against him and got incredibly violent. The police attended.
The women never behave in this way

OP posts:
InWithPeaceOutWithStress · 04/07/2025 08:53

RedToothBrush · 04/07/2025 06:09

They end up antagonising the situation though. They aren't neutral bystanders. They have a firm agenda and a vested reason to want aggro. It gives them a career. So yes they are part of the problem because they are making a career out of it.

We live in an age of mobile phones. If something happens then there's footage that can be used. It's much less confrontational and if it's coming from those affected it's not adding this element of professional YouTuber looking for drama.

YouTubers could use this. They don't because they want to be the one with the insight, exclusive or scoop. And that's where it goes wrong.

And their in lies a lot of the problem. They aren't neutral observers. They benefit from sensationalism. Many have very clear agendas. And that raises questions about the information they give you.

It's fuelling problems and they become part of that problem as a result.

It creates situations which are being manipulated to cause disorder.

Agree. These YouTubers are an embarrassment.

akkakk · 04/07/2025 09:25

Diverze · 04/07/2025 07:47

That is exactly how what you wrote is interpreted grammatically. You wrote

"Allies (claim) trans are the most marginalised and vulnerable .....while the delicate flowers are on film acting violently and attacking women (and men)".

So whether it was your intent or not, you made no distinction between trans people and TRAs and did in fact in what you wrote, blame trans people for the actions of TRAs.

So - are you saying that TRAs and trans people are two completely separate groups? If so it might be the first time in history that advocacy for a group has come only from those not in that group…

if not (and we know there is overlap) then it is valid to say that many TRAs are also in the trans group…

the irony being pointed out that there is a claim being made in video that trans people are ‘delicate flowers’ while at a protest where they are clearly showing anything but!

this is yet another issue to be challenged - the deliberate lies to distort the truth… on the one hand make loud claims of minority (accurate) / vulnerability (while physically and verbally attacking others including death threats) / ‘literally suicidal’ (despite literally not being suicidal!) / oppressed (while being the oppressor)… while on the other hand every action showing the absolute opposite

as others have said - if this is not the habit of trans people then where are those criticising it?

as a man I am happy to stand up and say not in my name - they may be men, but they don’t speak for all men, nor is what they do something of which any man would be proud

TheOtherRaven · 04/07/2025 11:28

Quite. This is NAMALTing.

It's like 'oh but you can't keep men out of women's toilets because what if you accidentally questioned some poor woman who looks a bit masculine' which is trying to manipulate women for men's benefit by leveraging their concern for other women and desire to be nice.

Fuck this. Fuck it completely.

At this point the TQ movement had less blotted their copybook than peed on it and set it on fire. Any bridge building with women is now going to have to come entirely from this apparently vast population of women-friendly reasonable TQ people.

But I repeat, again, all the TQ people I know, who are not peeing everywhere and screaming obscenities at random shoppers for no apparent reason, all absolutely believe in the entitlements, the harm, the violence, the primacy, they are cheering it on. It IS in their name. This is what the TQ movement is.

POWNewcastleEastWallsend · 04/07/2025 13:04

GreenFriedTomato · 04/07/2025 08:25

Exactly. There is a youtuber from Nottingham who was invited by LWS to view and film their event. They wanted it to be recorded and engage with him. He really didn't have a clue and ended up approaching the TRA side by mistake.
As soon as they realised he wasn't one of them (he wasn't against either, he was completely neutral as he didn't even know anything about either protest - just that it was 'something about rights') they turned against him and got incredibly violent. The police attended.
The women never behave in this way

Edited

It was even more ironic than that. From what the Nottingham YouTuber said about who invited him, it sounded like it was the TRA women at Nottingham Women's Aid (?) who contacted him out of the blue, suggesting that he come along to film them protesting the LWS event.

I am happy to be corrected but that is what I took from what the Nottingham YouTuber said.

I also find it very hard to imagine that LWS invited him to record the event. LWS events are set up to be live-streamed by KJK, direct to YouTube with one camera and direct to Twitter/X with another camera. They do not need to invite independent YouTubers to record the events on their behalf, although they do sometimes turn up.

Whatever, as PP have mentioned, the main things of note here are not how random YouTubers and sometimes "auditors" conduct themselves at events but

  • how those who are being filmed react (comparing women's rights activists to TRAs) and
  • the fact that otherwise there would be no public record at all or only a mainstream media propaganda version.

The "Laughing Auditor" has been wrongly criticised for seeking out "click bait" after he accidentally stumbled across the protest outside the building where the Lesbian Project was being launched. That was an unexpected baptism of fire for him and he has subsequently attended events where he expects to film more Men in Frocks Behaving Exceptionally Badly.

I honestly do not understand why the YouTubers and "auditors" are being blamed for the bad behaviour of people who have a habit of launching unprovoked attacks on women and innocent bystanders.

The YouTubers go all around the country filming and talking to random people on the streets without incident. It is no wonder that they are shocked when confronted with the naked aggression, harassment, obstruction and unhinged behaviour of TRAs.

IMHO at least part of the reason for TRAs behaving so badly at these events is that TRAs have taken over Anarchist and Antifa groups while "Anti-Racism" groups that are a front for the SWP have taken both them and free-floating TRAs under their wing.

Hence the paranoia, mask-wearing, self-righteous omnicause sloganeering (eg. Free Palestine and Trans Liberation in the same breath); mainly male crowds with a smattering of female Anarchist "cis allies" promoting "sex work" alongside representatives of "inclusive intersectional feminist" rape crisis services for "all women"; "Anti-Racist" groups organising the protests against the protests against "Drag Queen Story Hour" events, etc. etc.

There is a lot of fighting talk along with the usual suicide scare-mongering and genocide hyperbole in polemics published under the rubrics of "Tranarchy", "Trans Anarchism", "Trans Anarcho-Communism", etc. It is possible that the minority of those attending TRA rallies and protests who are violent, paranoid and obstructive might be driven as much by extremist political indoctrination as wrong-sex hormones and/or mental instability.

Grammarnut · 04/07/2025 13:09

Diverze · 04/07/2025 07:47

That is exactly how what you wrote is interpreted grammatically. You wrote

"Allies (claim) trans are the most marginalised and vulnerable .....while the delicate flowers are on film acting violently and attacking women (and men)".

So whether it was your intent or not, you made no distinction between trans people and TRAs and did in fact in what you wrote, blame trans people for the actions of TRAs.

All trans people are lying, though. They are pretending to be members of the opposite sex and invading the opposite sex spaces etc.This causes women (including TiF) great harm. And women at LWS or other meetings, demos or rallies do not behave in an aggressive manner in any way at all. Unlike TRAs.
Interesting to watch was the number of allies being asked what rights trans people had lost, and not being able to answer except 'all of them' or 'lots of them'. Since no rights have been lost at all this was very instructive - groupthink and indoctrination.

Diverze · 04/07/2025 13:16

Grammarnut · 04/07/2025 13:09

All trans people are lying, though. They are pretending to be members of the opposite sex and invading the opposite sex spaces etc.This causes women (including TiF) great harm. And women at LWS or other meetings, demos or rallies do not behave in an aggressive manner in any way at all. Unlike TRAs.
Interesting to watch was the number of allies being asked what rights trans people had lost, and not being able to answer except 'all of them' or 'lots of them'. Since no rights have been lost at all this was very instructive - groupthink and indoctrination.

Edited

We have had this conversation before as well on here.
Trans people by and large are not "lying" in their heads. The vast majority believe sincerely that they have the soul or essence of the sex that their body is not.

You might think this is a mental disorder, an abberation, brainwashing, a cult, you might disagree with their thoughts and feelings.

But the vast majority of trans people (especially the young, vulnerable ones) are not deliberately lying when they say that they believe they are the other gender.

RedToothBrush · 04/07/2025 13:29

Diverze · 04/07/2025 13:16

We have had this conversation before as well on here.
Trans people by and large are not "lying" in their heads. The vast majority believe sincerely that they have the soul or essence of the sex that their body is not.

You might think this is a mental disorder, an abberation, brainwashing, a cult, you might disagree with their thoughts and feelings.

But the vast majority of trans people (especially the young, vulnerable ones) are not deliberately lying when they say that they believe they are the other gender.

Whats going on in their heads is irrelevant, if they know they are trans because if they do, they know their gender identity isn't the same as their birth sex and the law has been clear about this.

They therefore make a clear choice to ignore the law.

MoodyAndBlue · 04/07/2025 13:51

Why were the two lesbians going to the front and getting in the crowd when they clearly didn't agree with the protest. One had a body cam on. It's almost like looking for trouble. Seems weird to mr

spannasaurus · 04/07/2025 13:57

MoodyAndBlue · 04/07/2025 13:51

Why were the two lesbians going to the front and getting in the crowd when they clearly didn't agree with the protest. One had a body cam on. It's almost like looking for trouble. Seems weird to mr

They weren't getting in the crowd. The crowd surrounded them. It's a common TRA tactic, surround and kettle people them complain about them being violent and invading TRA space.

MoodyAndBlue · 04/07/2025 14:35

RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 03/07/2025 19:18

As far as I know, no trans person I have met has been involved in physical violence - but shouting "bigot" and trying to impose their rules have been a common factor, even with those who have been prepared to have some debate with me.

I know very different people to you then and I'm sorry you have unpleasant people in your life. If you take any group of group of people though there will always be the unpleasant ones, racists etc etc. There are plenty of white people who are racist and bigoted, doesn't mean I am just because I'm white. You could literally apply it to just about any group in society and there will always be the trouble makers, football hooligans for example. So many many different examples and they shouldn't mean everyone else is tarred with the same brush

MoodyAndBlue · 04/07/2025 14:39

WomenShouldStillWinWomensSportsIsBack · 03/07/2025 18:07

I'm afraid I disagree. When I meet my numerous trans friends/relatives to speak to them, they're lovely and considerate, but then I see the misinformation and inflammatory shit they're posting and sharing on Facebook and realise that's only part of the story, to the point that I don't really want to see them anymore because of the amount of petrol-filled grenades they chuck out on social media with the assumption that everyone they know agrees with them.
I have come to realise that friendship with them is conditional on being inside the rightthink.
Maybe there are these mythical quiet trans people out there who are accomplished critical thinkers who can see the problems with TRA ideology but stay silent, but my friends/relatives are fairly quiet and unassuming in person largely due to massive social anxiety issues and autism stopping them saying or doing out loud a lot of what they feel safe to say or do online. That doesn't mean they don't agree with the TRAs, support them, send them money or perpetuate their lies.

They are not ' mythical' I know quite a number of trans people and none of them are like these people that are being described.

MoodyAndBlue · 04/07/2025 14:54

GarlicMetre · 03/07/2025 21:43

She pushed that bloke forwards because he was pushing her from in front. She was getting shoved back onto some other hefty protesters, who were trying to push back at her. TLDR: she was being sandwiched so tried to push the front guy out of the way.

They were grabbing at both the women. You can just see it at the sides of the frame.

But why did they even get in amongst them? Surely they could have just filmed from the side.

MoodyAndBlue · 04/07/2025 14:57

Helleofabore · 03/07/2025 21:58

By this, I mean that there is also no means at all for a male person to even know what it is that they are really ‘identifying’ as. It is simply not possible for them to describe what they ‘feel’ as being the same as how any female person ‘feels’. They describe it how ever they wish, but unless that label they use comes from materially real experiences, it is just impossible. For instance, I could never label something I feel as being like a man feels. Ever.

But I can label something that I experience or interpret as being that of a girl, because I have experienced that and have an accurate and real reference point to validate that experience. It doesn’t have to be a universally shared experience for it to be a true description that I have given that experience. It can be unique to me and still be valid to me and reflecting reality.

This is the blunt and unvarnished truth no matter how sincerely or desperately the person claiming this gender identity wants it to be.

So when someone says : “Of course it's possible to be trans, and to hold a deeply held belief that one is in one's essence of the opposite sex somehow.” Sure. People can believe they are whatever they want. But when there is no possible way for them to be what they say they are, no way for that ‘essence’ to be the opposite sex, why is society affirming this identity as if it is based on reality?

So in other words trans people don't exist, the end, nothing more to talk about

spannasaurus · 04/07/2025 15:01

MoodyAndBlue · 04/07/2025 14:54

But why did they even get in amongst them? Surely they could have just filmed from the side.

They didn't get amongst them the TRAs surrounded them. It's a common tactic swarm and surround people then start shouting that they are attacking when they really just trying to get away

Grammarnut · 04/07/2025 15:16

Diverze · 04/07/2025 13:16

We have had this conversation before as well on here.
Trans people by and large are not "lying" in their heads. The vast majority believe sincerely that they have the soul or essence of the sex that their body is not.

You might think this is a mental disorder, an abberation, brainwashing, a cult, you might disagree with their thoughts and feelings.

But the vast majority of trans people (especially the young, vulnerable ones) are not deliberately lying when they say that they believe they are the other gender.

But feelings are unverifiable. It's in their heads. We are not (thank the Lord) mind readers so cannot tell whether someone is a true believer or not. So we have to go on objective facts. And the facts are that you cannot be born in the wrong body and that your identified sex at birth is your sex - gender is something made up and men can go round in frocks as they like but if they do they must take the consequences, one of which is having a problem of where to pee (but, unlike women, they can always go behind a tree).

MoodyAndBlue · 04/07/2025 15:18

akkakk · 04/07/2025 09:25

So - are you saying that TRAs and trans people are two completely separate groups? If so it might be the first time in history that advocacy for a group has come only from those not in that group…

if not (and we know there is overlap) then it is valid to say that many TRAs are also in the trans group…

the irony being pointed out that there is a claim being made in video that trans people are ‘delicate flowers’ while at a protest where they are clearly showing anything but!

this is yet another issue to be challenged - the deliberate lies to distort the truth… on the one hand make loud claims of minority (accurate) / vulnerability (while physically and verbally attacking others including death threats) / ‘literally suicidal’ (despite literally not being suicidal!) / oppressed (while being the oppressor)… while on the other hand every action showing the absolute opposite

as others have said - if this is not the habit of trans people then where are those criticising it?

as a man I am happy to stand up and say not in my name - they may be men, but they don’t speak for all men, nor is what they do something of which any man would be proud

It's also been said on here that many of the TRA's are not even trans so you can't have it both ways.

akkakk · 04/07/2025 15:24

MoodyAndBlue · 04/07/2025 15:18

It's also been said on here that many of the TRA's are not even trans so you can't have it both ways.

???!!!

Suspect that doesn’t mean what you think it does! Read what I said!

RedToothBrush · 04/07/2025 15:33

akkakk · 04/07/2025 15:24

???!!!

Suspect that doesn’t mean what you think it does! Read what I said!

No she said that many of the people at the protest are allies and don't claim to be trans themselves.

Some of the allies are the worst TRAs for extremist positions.

See Jolyon for example. Another would be Suzie Green. Or try the Webberleys.

Dummydimmer · 04/07/2025 15:35

They were punched and kicked, why are they being described as violent?

akkakk · 04/07/2025 15:37

MoodyAndBlue · 04/07/2025 14:57

So in other words trans people don't exist, the end, nothing more to talk about

People who believe they are trans (on a scale from fully delusional to pretending for nefarious purposes) - they exist.

people who are actually trans (ie have moved in any way shape or form between being a man and a woman - or v.v.) - nope, not biologically possible to transition even a little bit - so they don’t exist

born a man - always 100% a man
born a woman - always 100% a woman

adding breasts / removing breasts / mutilating genitalia / taking hormones / changing name / choosing pronouns / getting a GRC / telling everyone you are now the opposite sex / wearing a skirt (or not wearing a skirt) / changing how you talk / which loos you use / court cases / political lobbying / etc… none of it changes your sex

it really is as simple as sex is immutable - therefore will never change - therefore it is not possible for any human to be trans.

but in reality, none of this debate is about whether trans people exist - we all know that they don’t / can’t - it is why they call themselves transwomen or transmen, it is because they know that they are not and never will be the other sex. Even those who feel most strongly that they identify with the opposite sex know that they are not actually the opposite sex.

the debate is about misogyny / abuse / aggression / suppression / devaluing women to boost the morale of men etc

ArabellaScott · 04/07/2025 15:38

Diverze · 04/07/2025 13:16

We have had this conversation before as well on here.
Trans people by and large are not "lying" in their heads. The vast majority believe sincerely that they have the soul or essence of the sex that their body is not.

You might think this is a mental disorder, an abberation, brainwashing, a cult, you might disagree with their thoughts and feelings.

But the vast majority of trans people (especially the young, vulnerable ones) are not deliberately lying when they say that they believe they are the other gender.

If a trans person truly believes they are the opposite sex, or can change sex, they are by definition not accepting of reality. We'd call this delusion.

If a trans person understands they are one biological sex, but wishes to try to pretend to be the opposite sex, they are by definition trying to deceive people. We'd call this lying.

It's one or the other.

MoodyAndBlue · 04/07/2025 15:46

spannasaurus · 04/07/2025 13:57

They weren't getting in the crowd. The crowd surrounded them. It's a common TRA tactic, surround and kettle people them complain about them being violent and invading TRA space.

I've just rewatched it and the billboard man and the lesbian with dreadlocks go right up to the front, then the hoody lesbian is getting in and amongst them. Why do that? There's a lot of pushing and shoving going on but they definitely put themselves in there.