Outspoken TRA 'Legaltweetz' suddenly turns against transactivitism

[NotTerfNorCis]

Fascinating stuff. Long-time TRA and transman https://x.com/legaltweetz has made an almost overnight conversion to the gender critical side.

'I honestly feel like I’m leaving a cult. Where saying anything outside of the accepted narrative will get a bunch of anime pfps attacking your character.'

Legaltweetz is now under sustained attack from other TRAs.

If you're on Twitter, go take a look. This person was one of the most vocal TRAs on there until a month ago.

Wondering if it's no coincidence that it's a female person who's got disenchanted with the ideology and its supporters.

Wish you hadn’t mentioned caramel wafers …….

Phew. I don't like marshmallows. I've been too afraid to speak out against Tunnocks teacakes for so long now.

That's a legitimate position to hold and your right to hold it will be respected.

I'm still trying to work up the nerve to go onto the James Bond subreddit and explain why Austin Powers is crap. I swear, in that space, Mike Myers is a bigger sacred cow than Sean Connery.

It's been LGB for most of my life. LGBT has never sounded right to me. It's a relatively recent change whether you admit that or not. And LGBTQ - even worse.

She’s not getting an easy time on SM. It seems clear to me that she’s mentally very unwell.

Can’t wait to see the dossier anyway, I wonder if she took video or photos of all the secret terf meetings, if she managed to crack all our secret codes, and uncovered our plan for world domination? I’m sure it will be just riveting.

I have no issue with people being in the kind and welcoming category. I have an issue with the people in this category lecturing others who are suspicious of the 180 turn to be kind and welcoming. She was not just a detransitioner, she was (and apparently still is) a full on vitriolic TRA.

Just like it's not ok for the gender ideology side to try force "kindness" aka women's boundaries being removed, it's also not ok for the GC side to force kindness on our own side so that we look like the better side by being welcoming to people who have harmed us. It's also boundary removal for someone else in the name of kindness.

Yes, I think this has been a great example of trans insanity. My view is that she was a nasty woman then, in the middle and now. I don't believe in gender and her sex has never changed but her manipulations and nastiness have always remained the same, she just turn them on her own side for a short period.

After legaltweetz "detransition" I saw so many GCs schooling others in how to be nice and welcoming in quite an unpleasant manner hypocritically enough. We don't ever have to be nice to those who have harmed us. Although I believe kindness to detransitioners who weren't TRAs is important, I wouldn't try to push my view on others.

If Legaltweetz got some of that Big Oil MAGA Money then it's only right and proper she should give it back. I'll look after it in my account, my paypal is IWantMy40MagaBucksAndMoscowMule at terfhq dot org

I wonder if it will be of the 'Julie Bindel promised me a bride' level of utter nonsense this time around.

How can anyone possibly talk about Austin Powers in the same breath as James Bond? It's like comparing a Cheese String to a crunchy mature cheddar.

Anyway, the comparison to Connery is insignificant, the best Bond is obviously Daniel Craig.

I agree. This is a religion that doesn’t welcome honest doubt and a bit of dithering. She will have been welcomed by the GC and horribly doxed by old allies. More seriously I suspect her IRL ‘friends’ will have turned against her. I don’t really blame her for trying to take this way back.

But if she does have the MAGA millions then please give it back. Also that last box of tea cakes. Thank you.

<sharp intake of breath >

Well Tunnocks Teacakes get a mention in the Hallmarked Man, so we know which side JKR's on...😉

May be this individual panicked when they saw what happened to Charlie Kirk

Oh FFS which of you let her see the plans?
Sigh, back to the drawing board.

I got dyess vibes from the start.

Both Pink News and Owen Jones believed the international network of powerful lesbians story, IIRC.

It really was the most outlandish nonsense

https://unherd.com/2021/11/why-i-sued-pinknews/

I appreciate your kind words, however I suspect there are voodoo dollies for me being knitted in the Bluestocking as we speak...

It's all coming out of the woodwork now! Someone has started a thread with an anti-cheesecake username!

I just couldn't keep quiet about marshmallows any longer.

I don't know the guy, but this is quite funny. If 'gender critical' far right fluffers knew anything about trans people then they would know that, even if a trans person desists / detransitions, they very often retransition because the dysphoria gets too much to deal with.

Now the hateful 'gender crticial' activists have egg on their faces because they don't know anything about the people they dedicate their lives to obsessing about 🙄

BS, just use the gents.

Just as men don't know what it's like to be a woman, and never will. Because they cannot become one.

fluffers

For those who don't know porn industry slang, Bee is calling us cocksuckers. Male people who claim to be female really aren't very good at hiding their misogyny.

a walking shadow, a poor player,
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing

I pointed that out on another thread and one of out TQ+ visitors berated me for getting it "wrong".

But it is funny how the TQ+ are so desperate to rewrite history.

WTAF!

I see Bee whatsit is still so furious about the ‘no’ from the Supreme Court that he’s unable to resist making a tit of himself on the internet

’far right fluffers’ eh Bee? Not very ladylike

Yes, it sort of became a redundant job in the Viagra age, but in the porn industry, a fluffer is the girl who doesn't appear in the actual movie, her job is to get the male star hard before he starts work.

Interesting that it's a term someone would casually reach for.