Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Anyone else worried Trump’s advocacy of gender-critical views taints and discredits them?

214 replies

PotteringPondering · 27/03/2025 03:52

I’m gender-critical, and was pleased when Trump issued his early Executive Orders on Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation, and Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports.

But now… everything else. The sickening bullying of Zelensky and support for Putin, the threats to invade allies, the insults, lies, laziness, lawbreaking, cruelty and incompetence.

I’m concerned the fact Trump is an advocate of gender-critical views taints and discredits them in the eyes of thinking people. The verdict of history may be harsh because of the Trump connection.

I’m a resident of Terf Island, and still passionately hold GC views. But the support of Trump and Vance is starting to feel less like a blessing, more like a kiss of death.

OP posts:
withthegreatestrespect · 27/03/2025 15:38

Ereshkigalangcleg · 27/03/2025 14:37

It’s never been in the power of gender critical feminists to control how we are flagrantly misrepresented by people who support this reality-challenged ideology.

Which includes being misrepresented by plenty of so-called feminists. I honestly don't know what the word feminist means any more. I'm definitely not a feminist if it involves falling over backwards to give away women's rights to men and massive safeguarding fails wrt children

withthegreatestrespect · 27/03/2025 15:45

illinivich · 27/03/2025 08:48

We're going to need a separate board for all of these threads soon.

Posts just asking if its really worth opposing trans ideology if it means agreeing with trump. Then lots of british women dutifully condemning trump, even though they havent actually supported him at all.

Concerned posters castigating other posters for not following the script - we are supposed to say trump isnt GC, he's a convicted rapists, he wants women barefoot and pregnant....

It's going to go on and on, because the concerned posters want us to say that fighting trans ideology is not worth it. Its been going on for years. At first it was because opposing trans ideology wasnt progressive, or anti gay, or anti women, or racists, or against 'intersex people', now its pro trump.

Everything around trans ideology becomes scripted and full of slogans. Having to continuously reply to bullshit accusations is just following their script.

Ive said it before, but if the concerned posters really believed that trump was such an imminent danger to women, they wouldn't be spending their time on a british parenting forum.

This is a perfect post. The argument always seems to be we should just give up the fight and return to the loving embrace of the 'progressives'. We are the sane ones here and poll after poll in the UK show that the public, including pluralities of lib dem and labour voters and young voters, agree with us.

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 27/03/2025 16:00

Middleagedstriker · 27/03/2025 14:29

I think it undermines our cause. MAGA types /Trump tend not just be GC but transphobic. This aligns is with hate rather than caring about women.
It also gives strength and credence to many around the other anti feminist view points he holds.

What is your definition of transphobic? What is your definition of Nazism? JK Rowling has been accused many, many times of being both, yet she is neither, just because people make accusations about you it doesn’t make it true.

I don’t believe anyone is born in the wrong body, I don’t believe that there are any trans children, I don’t believe people can change sex, and I definitely don’t believe that TWAW because they are MEN, am I transphobic?

I don’t want men in women’s spaces, refuges, sports or prisons, I don’t want children to be prescribed life changing and irreversible medication or for ND teenage girls to have their healthy breasts removed, am I transphobic? People call others all sorts of things when they refuse to comply with their wishes, especially women, it’s as old as time and I couldn’t care less what people think.

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 27/03/2025 16:06

Middleagedstriker · 27/03/2025 14:54

Who on earth is suggesting that? I'm just acknowledging that there is an issue with being aligned with one of trumps most prominent policies. Doesn't mean we should stop anything. Just something to be aware of if trying to win hearts and minds. It is a barrier to our campaign so needs to be recognized as such and handled.
One way of doing this is to acknowledge that Trump holds his views but that doesn't mean that we agree with the majority of his other policies.

‘One way of doing this is to acknowledge that Trump holds his views but that doesn't mean that we agree with the majority of his other policies.’

I may be wrong but that is EXACTLY what the majority of us on this thread have been doing!!

OuterSpaceCadet · 27/03/2025 16:22

https://deadwildroses.com/2019/10/07/handy-venn-diagrams-the-radical-feminist-position-on-gender/

The Trump administration loves gender stereotypes just as much as gender ideology believers love gender stereotypes.

It's so tiring having to repeatedly point out that it's not simply a choice between the misogyny of the right or the misogyny of the left. It's feminist board FFS. Surely our aim is no fucking misogyny at all?

Handy Venn Diagrams – The Radical Feminist Position on Gender

Visit the post for more.

https://deadwildroses.com/2019/10/07/handy-venn-diagrams-the-radical-feminist-position-on-gender/

Middleagedstriker · 27/03/2025 16:32

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 27/03/2025 16:06

‘One way of doing this is to acknowledge that Trump holds his views but that doesn't mean that we agree with the majority of his other policies.’

I may be wrong but that is EXACTLY what the majority of us on this thread have been doing!!

I agree. I made the original comment at the top of the thread.

Arran2024 · 27/03/2025 16:35

OuterSpaceCadet · 27/03/2025 16:22

https://deadwildroses.com/2019/10/07/handy-venn-diagrams-the-radical-feminist-position-on-gender/

The Trump administration loves gender stereotypes just as much as gender ideology believers love gender stereotypes.

It's so tiring having to repeatedly point out that it's not simply a choice between the misogyny of the right or the misogyny of the left. It's feminist board FFS. Surely our aim is no fucking misogyny at all?

The diagram doesn't show how these beliefs translate.

For example, conservatives may believe in physical sex which cannot change. Some think that the sporting issue doesn't matter because they think that sport is unfeminine and shouldn't be encouraged. Trans ideologies also think that the sporting issue doesn't matter, but not because of the physical sex issue.

You basically have layers and layers of outcomes on top of the belief layer, and if you created a diagram to intersect them, you wouldn't have the three ideologies stacked on top of each other - they would be all over the place.

And so there is plenty of space for feminists, or at least people who consider themselves to be feminists, to take up positions that don't seem reason to other feminists.

Helleofabore · 27/03/2025 16:39

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 27/03/2025 16:06

‘One way of doing this is to acknowledge that Trump holds his views but that doesn't mean that we agree with the majority of his other policies.’

I may be wrong but that is EXACTLY what the majority of us on this thread have been doing!!

I think that there are still some people on social media and in real life who will continue to try to undermine the efforts of women regardless of the tone, the actions and the words that women say. All because they, personally, tend towards tribalism even when they will flat out deny that they do.

They will be affronted at the suggestion, yet the outcome of what they say, do and post themselves does reflect that tribalism.

Telling women's groups that they should also 'denounce' Trump while still trying to work with Trump's team seems to me to be an overly simplistic view on how campaigning works. And women shouldn't have to be constantly justifying their stance in fear that some groups that already have misrepresented our political alignment may continue to do so. Particularly since we are also confident that this issue negatively impacts all families and women across the political spectrum and this is reflected in the opinion polls.

Edit: Of course, I agree with you.

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 27/03/2025 16:59

Helleofabore · 27/03/2025 16:39

I think that there are still some people on social media and in real life who will continue to try to undermine the efforts of women regardless of the tone, the actions and the words that women say. All because they, personally, tend towards tribalism even when they will flat out deny that they do.

They will be affronted at the suggestion, yet the outcome of what they say, do and post themselves does reflect that tribalism.

Telling women's groups that they should also 'denounce' Trump while still trying to work with Trump's team seems to me to be an overly simplistic view on how campaigning works. And women shouldn't have to be constantly justifying their stance in fear that some groups that already have misrepresented our political alignment may continue to do so. Particularly since we are also confident that this issue negatively impacts all families and women across the political spectrum and this is reflected in the opinion polls.

Edit: Of course, I agree with you.

Edited

Some people can’t function without a tribe of some sort. People who are tribal find it extremely frustrating having conversations with people who think critically and don’t need a tribe, I had it in my family growing up, especially with my father and two of my older brothers, because I didn’t comply with their rigidity of thinking, and had my own opinions, I was called stupid or awkward or difficult. The plain fact was I didn’t agree with them, and their failure to make me comply made them very angry. The fact that I was female didn’t help!

RedToothBrush · 27/03/2025 17:20

Helleofabore · 27/03/2025 14:43

So what is your solution then?

Are women’s groups supposed to wait until just the right leader is in power and then ask for consideration at that time!

Or, as throughout history, lobby groups work both with the political party and leadership in power and the opposition to attain their objectives?

This is the government in power for the next four years. Elected in a democratic election in a country that prides itself on its political freedom.

The people who want to denigrate those who campaign for women’s and girl’s rights including single sex spaces, and sports plus those groups campaigning for the protection of children against this medicalisation for gender are going to denigrate those people anyway. But to continue to blame those groups for doing what all other professional and non-professional campaign groups do seems completely back the front. Yet so many people seem to be doing just that.

14. Women have all the rights they need: The right to remain silent.

TempestTost · 27/03/2025 17:22

LadyBracknellsHandbagg · 27/03/2025 16:00

What is your definition of transphobic? What is your definition of Nazism? JK Rowling has been accused many, many times of being both, yet she is neither, just because people make accusations about you it doesn’t make it true.

I don’t believe anyone is born in the wrong body, I don’t believe that there are any trans children, I don’t believe people can change sex, and I definitely don’t believe that TWAW because they are MEN, am I transphobic?

I don’t want men in women’s spaces, refuges, sports or prisons, I don’t want children to be prescribed life changing and irreversible medication or for ND teenage girls to have their healthy breasts removed, am I transphobic? People call others all sorts of things when they refuse to comply with their wishes, especially women, it’s as old as time and I couldn’t care less what people think.

Yeah, I am actually unsure of what people mean when they say MAGA types, or conservatives, are transphobic, I a way that GC people are not.

Of course individuals vary, there are surely MAGA types that are fundamentally haters. But then, I've occasionally met GC people who were misandrists too - both seem more of an individual thing to me.

Even people like Matt Walsh, who is supposedly the epitome of the transphobic type, as far as I can see has the same fundamental issues with gender ideology:

It is scientific nonsense
It is dangerous for women and undermines women's rights
It is dangerous to children, psychologically and physically
It involves medical malpractice
It is being used as a vehicle for anti-social sexual behaviours
And even - it is bad for the people who have bought into it and identify as transgendered.

I'm really not seeing a fundamental difference here. I think that does, in fact, make people on the left who believe "being good" is inherently left wing, and that people on the right must be evil in some way, very, very uncomfortable. And that's the origin of a lot of these threads.

thatsthewayitis · 27/03/2025 17:23

Okay, I'm American, lesbian and a lifelong libertarian-conservative.
The obsession here is Trump's personality. No one cares, we're not dating him. He just gave back women's rights and sports and isn't afraid to withhold Federal dollars to make states, like Maine fall in line.
He's shut the border and shipped out illegal hard-core gang members and now the foreign students on visas who were running and participating in university shut downs and anti-Semitism. He's cutting government fraud and waste.
All of which the Democrats oppose. Their popularity has sunk to 26%. Lowest ever recorded.
In the US Trump is very popular.

TempestTost · 27/03/2025 17:30

Their popularity has sunk to 26%.

This is just wild.

RedToothBrush · 27/03/2025 17:33

TempestTost · 27/03/2025 17:22

Yeah, I am actually unsure of what people mean when they say MAGA types, or conservatives, are transphobic, I a way that GC people are not.

Of course individuals vary, there are surely MAGA types that are fundamentally haters. But then, I've occasionally met GC people who were misandrists too - both seem more of an individual thing to me.

Even people like Matt Walsh, who is supposedly the epitome of the transphobic type, as far as I can see has the same fundamental issues with gender ideology:

It is scientific nonsense
It is dangerous for women and undermines women's rights
It is dangerous to children, psychologically and physically
It involves medical malpractice
It is being used as a vehicle for anti-social sexual behaviours
And even - it is bad for the people who have bought into it and identify as transgendered.

I'm really not seeing a fundamental difference here. I think that does, in fact, make people on the left who believe "being good" is inherently left wing, and that people on the right must be evil in some way, very, very uncomfortable. And that's the origin of a lot of these threads.

12. Women’s ability to recognize male behavior patterns is misandry.

TempestTost · 27/03/2025 17:37

RedToothBrush · 27/03/2025 17:33

12. Women’s ability to recognize male behavior patterns is misandry.

And what's a woman's ability to recognize female behavior, then?

withthegreatestrespect · 27/03/2025 17:38

TempestTost · 27/03/2025 17:37

And what's a woman's ability to recognize female behavior, then?

Nobody cares because it's just about women😂

RedToothBrush · 27/03/2025 17:42

withthegreatestrespect · 27/03/2025 17:38

Nobody cares because it's just about women😂

Quite

"men are afraid of hurt feelings, women are afraid of men killing them"

PippistrelleBat · 27/03/2025 17:44

thatsthewayitis · 27/03/2025 17:23

Okay, I'm American, lesbian and a lifelong libertarian-conservative.
The obsession here is Trump's personality. No one cares, we're not dating him. He just gave back women's rights and sports and isn't afraid to withhold Federal dollars to make states, like Maine fall in line.
He's shut the border and shipped out illegal hard-core gang members and now the foreign students on visas who were running and participating in university shut downs and anti-Semitism. He's cutting government fraud and waste.
All of which the Democrats oppose. Their popularity has sunk to 26%. Lowest ever recorded.
In the US Trump is very popular.

A lot of what UK/Europe/rest of world worry about with Trump are behaviours a lot of Americans would view as positive for America. Whether such blinkered American-centric policies work out for America in the longer term remains to be seen but they produce winning rhetoric at the moment.

TempestTost · 27/03/2025 17:47

RedToothBrush · 27/03/2025 17:42

Quite

"men are afraid of hurt feelings, women are afraid of men killing them"

So why did you bring it up? Are you implying that there are no women like that? Or that it isn't an example of an individual belief rather than something intrinsically connected to being GC?

TheKeatingFive · 27/03/2025 18:00

Not at all.

The extraordinary thing is not that Trump is a sex realist.

The extraordinary thing is that the Democrats are not.

RedToothBrush · 27/03/2025 18:00

TempestTost · 27/03/2025 17:47

So why did you bring it up? Are you implying that there are no women like that? Or that it isn't an example of an individual belief rather than something intrinsically connected to being GC?

Because women are not allowed to defend themselves. You are perfectly demonstrating Bewilderness's rules of misogyny on this subject.

Women not being allowed to name themselves. They are not allowed to name males patterns of abuse which have evidence to back up the fact they are sex based. Instead they are smeared for doing so as unreasonable and nasty.

Women have legitimate reasons to be concerned on these issues.

Igmum · 27/03/2025 19:52

TheKeatingFive · 27/03/2025 18:00

Not at all.

The extraordinary thing is not that Trump is a sex realist.

The extraordinary thing is that the Democrats are not.

This 👆💯

TempestTost · 27/03/2025 22:12

RedToothBrush · 27/03/2025 18:00

Because women are not allowed to defend themselves. You are perfectly demonstrating Bewilderness's rules of misogyny on this subject.

Women not being allowed to name themselves. They are not allowed to name males patterns of abuse which have evidence to back up the fact they are sex based. Instead they are smeared for doing so as unreasonable and nasty.

Women have legitimate reasons to be concerned on these issues.

I was talking about the reason people on the political right have a problem with gender ideology.

I don't know what you are talking about because it seems to have zero to do with my post.

Helleofabore · 27/03/2025 23:32

thatsthewayitis · 27/03/2025 17:23

Okay, I'm American, lesbian and a lifelong libertarian-conservative.
The obsession here is Trump's personality. No one cares, we're not dating him. He just gave back women's rights and sports and isn't afraid to withhold Federal dollars to make states, like Maine fall in line.
He's shut the border and shipped out illegal hard-core gang members and now the foreign students on visas who were running and participating in university shut downs and anti-Semitism. He's cutting government fraud and waste.
All of which the Democrats oppose. Their popularity has sunk to 26%. Lowest ever recorded.
In the US Trump is very popular.

Wow. I hadn’t been following the trend for support polls. That 25% is a remarkable drop!!

GraduationDay · 28/03/2025 07:48

RedToothBrush · 27/03/2025 12:48

7% of voters voted for / against Brexit on the basis of actual EU related issues. That's on both sides of the debate.

The official Vote Leave actively and openly have admitted that their campaign strategy was to tap into wider voter dissatisfaction - that includes everything from bins and pot holes to immigration policy.

The Brexit vote was known to be a watershed in terms of have international politics has played out. And it was nearly ten years ago now.

Yet so many people have not caught up with how the political landscape has changed and why voters vote the way they do.

Then COVID happened and compounded it.

Voters in the UK certainly are more likely to vote AGAINST someone than in a most positive way FOR someone. This caught the Labour party by surprise at the last election. They thought they'd have a resounding victory with everyone wanting them in power, and whilst they've managed to get a shed load of seats this election, their margin of victory is wafer thing. The reception has been luke warm at best. And incumbent governments tend to lose ground at subsequent elections.

This is due to a feeling of general mismanagement at local and national level - something again reflected in the US. And the response to that is to have an attitude of 'things are terrible so I might as well vote for radical change because it can't possibly get worse than this', rather than people voting FOR whatever changes are proposed. Most people don't even look too deeply at policy.

The trans issue therefore stands out particularly badly, and is somewhat unique, because you don't have to have an in-depth understanding of policy. It's easy to know you are being trained at work or seeing in sport or on TV that you are being told to ignore what you can see with your eyes and support an untruth. It gets under the skin and annoys people in a way that hospitals, or housing or jobs don't.

And yes it's a trust issue at it's core too because it feeds into this sense of mismanagement and corruption at the heart of established politics.

Until other parties can get to grips with this issue they are screwed and they don't seem, even after nearly ten years, to be fully grasping the nature of the problem...

Yes! I like the way you put this. I was trying to figure out what exactly irks me about the Elon Musk’s son story that just came out. Why should I even care? But it does bother me so I guess that’s it. It’s that he is a dude. A guy! But I’m being asked to pretend he’s a young woman. And I just don’t want to. I don’t know exactly why I don’t want to but bottom line is, I don’t. It’s probably something primal to do with self preservation as men are so inherently dangerous for women and we need to be able to pick them out of a line up. And the trans brigade wants to tell me I’m a bad person because of that. So yes, I think for many people it’s the minor irritation even if it doesn’t massively impact them in everyday life, that’s enough to make this issue count politically.

Swipe left for the next trending thread