For example women and children are most at risk by a mile from their own partners and families (both in terms of murder, violence and rape). Trans women in toilets and strangers in bushes are red herrings to distract us from the very real danger that your own husband or partner (statistically & theoretically speaking) poses to you and your kids and other women and children around you.
No, it is disingenuous of you to attempt to claim that the women here ONLY care about "trans women - aka men - in women's toilets" and don't notice or care about domestic violence or the higher prevalence of, as you say "the very real danger that your own husband or partner poses". We understand the statistics, you see.
Where we differ is that we see it ALL as the misogyny it is and don't make the silly exception YOU choose to for men who id as women. Who have been busily dismantling many of the rights women fought for to protect against ALL misogyny. It's just another branch of it. It's not 'minor'. You are making a false dichotomy here. It's a false narrative you're pushing. it's not either or.
Do you even know who we are and what we believe? Because it really doesn't sound like it.
You do realise, don't you, that some of the biggest "terves" are fighting against trans ideology BECAUSE they understand male violence far, FAR better than you do? These are women who have fought for DECADES against male violence. ALL male violence. These are women who were active in actually getting legislation against male violence. ALL of it. Why are you making the false claim that we "only" care about "trans women in toilets and not domestic violence, rape, and all the male violence against women" you are talking about?
You don't know who you're talking to, do you? Again. You've been misinformed.