Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

This is why so many women voted Trump

1000 replies

BabyLlamaZen · 07/11/2024 22:13

I’m not saying it’s right, I’m not saying it’s worth the horrors of the Trump administration (and what other women’s rights will be abolished). However, I can also empathise. Books like this are everywhere in baby sections of bookshops in USA. My american friend is naturally more conservative than myself although hated Trump and didn’t vote for him previously (she abstained and then she went Biden although she says she seriously regrets) and this time she voted Trump. She said this stuff is now everywhere and it’s constant. She also showed me a baby’s ABC book which included B for bisexual (and literally then described it as people who are sexually attracted to either gender). For babies.

This is why so many women voted Trump
This is why so many women voted Trump
This is why so many women voted Trump
This is why so many women voted Trump
OP posts:
Thread gallery
36
RedToothBrush · 10/11/2024 11:00

BonfireLady · 10/11/2024 10:57

I think I should run the world.

Go for it @Datun ! When the bar is set by people like Trump and Starmer, it leaves the floor wide open for common sense to step in. Based on your posting history, you've got plenty of this, plus a good working knowledge of the importance of safeguarding, medical evidence and the idea that we can't force people to declare a belief that they don't hold. Based on that alone, you're leagues ahead of several others. Obviously please just don't do a Truss and tank the economy. She was phenomenal on gender identity stuff but not so much on anything else.

Datun seem sane.

I don't think I fear a repeat of Liz Truss with Datun.

BonfireLady · 10/11/2024 11:00

MrsOvertonsWindow · 10/11/2024 10:55

Presumably BonfireLady was asking as you cited your doctorate & 15 years of "research experience" as reasons why some of your outdated and inaccurate posts should be believed? Given the nature of your claims - puberty blockers are harmless and reversible, no such thing as social contagion and always speaking about "people" in response to posts about children, you shouldn't be surprised that posters have accurately identified your posts as examples of extreme transactivism.

Indeed.

Yes, I did politely ask but I'm also politely incredulous at the "facts" that presumably result from all this research.

To be fair, some of my incredulity probably comes across a little impolitely but I'm finding it very difficult to keep my sarcasm at bay. I accept that I'm probably failing on this.

nolongersurprised · 10/11/2024 11:02

and always speaking about "people" in response to posts about children

Ugh

Sortumn · 10/11/2024 11:05

Tandora · 10/11/2024 10:12

The research quite clearly shows that the vast majority share my experience

It really doesn't; you are not trans and have no experience of what it is like to be trans. Being neurodivergent, bisexual and gender non conforming is not the same as being trans.

Edited

That's exactly what people have been saying over and over on this thread. Looks like you're on the same page.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 10/11/2024 11:05

BonfireLady · 10/11/2024 11:00

Indeed.

Yes, I did politely ask but I'm also politely incredulous at the "facts" that presumably result from all this research.

To be fair, some of my incredulity probably comes across a little impolitely but I'm finding it very difficult to keep my sarcasm at bay. I accept that I'm probably failing on this.

Me too. When arguments are cited that have been discredited for years, when the issues about safeguarding children from the belief that their bodies are wrong and can be fixed by a sex change are ignored or dismissed, it's difficult not to be furious or dripping with sarcasm.
I am genuinely grateful to so many posters upthread who have patiently responded with facts, science and an overwhelming care for mentally vulnerable children & young people in the face of some awful inaccurate and tone deaf posts.

Datun · 10/11/2024 11:05

nolongersurprised · 10/11/2024 11:02

and always speaking about "people" in response to posts about children

Ugh

It's a very common switch. Ugh indeed.

BonfireLady · 10/11/2024 11:07

RedToothBrush · 10/11/2024 11:00

Datun seem sane.

I don't think I fear a repeat of Liz Truss with Datun.

Let's do this.

All we need is enough Labour MPs to start a vote of no confidence (surely enough of them are sufficiently annoyed) and Datun to run an electoral campaign on an AIBU thread.

Based on the Trump victory and their campaign focus on the impact of gender identity belief, something like this should do it: "AIBU to think that laws, education and healthcare should be centred on facts not ideological belief?"

Previous voting patterns after Brexit bus slogans and Labour's "vote for change" suggest you don't even need any policies yet to win, @Datun . They can come later. We can pool ideas on threads if that helps.

🙃

MrsOvertonsWindow · 10/11/2024 11:07

nolongersurprised · 10/11/2024 11:02

and always speaking about "people" in response to posts about children

Ugh

It's a persistent issue and usually highlights how even the youngest of children who couldn't possibly consent to sex change as a thing are cynically used by adult transactivists.

Lovelyview · 10/11/2024 11:08

Tandora · 10/11/2024 10:44

Obviously I am not going to out myself.

I understand you want to discredit and belittle me, but probably better to focus on the arguments rather than the person.

<a class="break-all" href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=www.chla.org/profile/johanna-olson-kennedy-md&ved=2ahUKEwiZs_fvzdGJAxXFU0EAHRB_Ju0QFnoECCkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0xGzox7L-pq7oaIXCiLjE_" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Johanna Olson-Kennedy, MD

Johanna Olson-Kennedy, MD is an Adolescent Medicine physician specializing in the care of gender non-conforming children and transgender youth. She is an 'expert' in gender medicine. She is currently being investigated for suppressing the results of a multi-million dollar study into puberty blockers which show that they have no affect on the mental health of gender distressed children which has been the only reason for prescribing them in the first place.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/healthcare/3200107/doctor-delays-federally-funded-puberty-blockers-report-for-political-reasons/

The 'experts' are ignoring the evidence. If you are an expert in gender medicine, you are ignoring the evidence. Can you see why we're angry yet?

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.chla.org/profile/johanna-olson-kennedy-md&ved=2ahUKEwiZs_fvzdGJAxXFU0EAHRB_Ju0QFnoECCkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0xGzox7L-pq7oaIXCiLjE_

RedToothBrush · 10/11/2024 11:08

nolongersurprised · 10/11/2024 10:49

No, I don’t agree. As soon as trans ideology hit the schools, medical establishment and sports it was organically amplified.

Not to mention the mainstream media coverage of it, plus Matt Walsh and the like.

The Left are to blame, they fostered this monstrosity.

The Chinese didn’t put Rachel Levine in the White House, or hire the non binary luggage stealer, did they?

Revolutions are the result of people power from grass roots.

This power exists in circumstances where people are dissatisfied.

Curiously there is a threshold at which Revolutions occur. It's about 20 - 25% unemployment. It happens world wide.

Here's a question; given how we now have such high levels of employment in the gig economy which potentially are hiding an issue with zero hours contracts would this help to disguise us being closer to that point than we think.

Inflation and a lack of workers rights would also have an effect.

Where does grassroots power come from? China? Russia?

There is this organic force that is universal. And we are seeing certain patterns happening.

It does make me wonder.

Datun · 10/11/2024 11:10

Lovelyview · 10/11/2024 11:08

<a class="break-all" href="https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=www.chla.org/profile/johanna-olson-kennedy-md&ved=2ahUKEwiZs_fvzdGJAxXFU0EAHRB_Ju0QFnoECCkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0xGzox7L-pq7oaIXCiLjE_" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Johanna Olson-Kennedy, MD

Johanna Olson-Kennedy, MD is an Adolescent Medicine physician specializing in the care of gender non-conforming children and transgender youth. She is an 'expert' in gender medicine. She is currently being investigated for suppressing the results of a multi-million dollar study into puberty blockers which show that they have no affect on the mental health of gender distressed children which has been the only reason for prescribing them in the first place.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/healthcare/3200107/doctor-delays-federally-funded-puberty-blockers-report-for-political-reasons/

The 'experts' are ignoring the evidence. If you are an expert in gender medicine, you are ignoring the evidence. Can you see why we're angry yet?

I think Tandoras research experience went to a different school.

Sortumn · 10/11/2024 11:13

RedToothBrush · 10/11/2024 10:32

There's a boy in my school who identifies as a girl. Everyone has propped it up to be kind.

He's still ten.

What happens when the hormones kick in?

Everyone 'being kind' has set him up for an inevitable crisis point.

Even if he takes blockers and cross sex hormones there is still an inevitable crisis point in turns of sexual function and restrictions to dating / long term relationships.

And that's without considering the possibility of long term complications from medicalisation.

He's been set up from the age of six to believe he can just become a girl.

He has no way to consent or to understand the implications at six.

No one has been kind to him. They continue to be incredibly cruel and negligent.

And organisations - schools, colleges etc that jump to instant affirmation set up a dichotomy where when Brian down the corner shop doesn't recognise the special gender qualities of this child, they experience discomfort that people know they're not the opposite sex really and it becomes a self fulfilling feedback loop.

borntobequiet · 10/11/2024 11:13

Tandora · 10/11/2024 10:44

Obviously I am not going to out myself.

I understand you want to discredit and belittle me, but probably better to focus on the arguments rather than the person.

Whether other posters wish to discredit or belittle you is beside the point, as almost everything you post undermines your academic and intellectual credibility, and your interpretation of others’ legitimate concerns, characterising them as politically reprehensible, is belittlement of yourself rather than of them.

RedToothBrush · 10/11/2024 11:13

Why did Michael Gove's comment back in 2016 about 'we've had enough of experts' resonant so well with so many voters?

There's still a lot of people who haven't figured this out yet and why it matters.

No Russians amplifying this were involved. It was said on national TV.

Shortshriftandlethal · 10/11/2024 11:14

CarolinaWren · 09/11/2024 21:25

You're probably correct that most women want to be mothers. However, I don't think most women want some rando politician making reproductive choices for them. Women want to be treated as adults and to have the freedom to do what is best for themselves and their families.

Well, then I suppose the fact that Trump won suggests they may have other priorities?

BonfireLady · 10/11/2024 11:17

Tandora · 10/11/2024 10:44

Obviously I am not going to out myself.

I understand you want to discredit and belittle me, but probably better to focus on the arguments rather than the person.

Just seen this one.

I don't want to belittle you. I can't discredit you if I don't know who you are or what research you've done.

I'm simply pointing out that your "facts" don't make sense. However, as I said above, I do accept that I'm being sarcastic. But I'm genuinely struggling to get my head around the idea that your "facts" are somehow supposed to be more accurate, objective and scientific than anything Transgender Trend has published.

However, I apologise for my sarcasm. I will endeavour to keep it in check when challenging the points that you raise from now on. (I've tried writing that sentence a few times because it keeps looking sarcastic. It's my best shot at sounding genuine so please accept/reject as you see fit).

GailBlancheViola · 10/11/2024 11:17

The Chinese didn’t put Rachel Levine in the White House, or hire the non binary luggage stealer, did they?

Or the TW who exposed and played with extreme enjoyment with their (artificial) breasts on the White House Lawn at an event organised by Joe Biden and published it far and wide for all to see and was described by Joe Biden as being part of the group of people who were the bravest ever in the whole wide world ever.

Shortshriftandlethal · 10/11/2024 11:19

EyeofOrion · 10/11/2024 10:44

I’m sorry, Red, but I find your repeated “It’s the Left’s fault” rather disturbing - like a kid that has eaten the last cupcake but blaming a brother that isn’t there.
What Trump/Farage have done - and the bots have amplified - is pick relentlessly at the cultural sores in society until they become infected and boil over. Immigration, race, religion, gender, sex - no matter what it is, or its place on the political spectrum, if it can spark a war of words between millions, it works.

Stop blaming the Left. It’s the bots.

I think what Red is doing is pointing out that it takes two. The radical/progressive cultural elite push their agenda and the conservative Rght responds, pushes back or reacts to that. Who gets to dictate or shape culture. The idea of inevitable historical progress or change which is always beneficial - is very questionable

Datun · 10/11/2024 11:20

GailBlancheViola · 10/11/2024 11:17

The Chinese didn’t put Rachel Levine in the White House, or hire the non binary luggage stealer, did they?

Or the TW who exposed and played with extreme enjoyment with their (artificial) breasts on the White House Lawn at an event organised by Joe Biden and published it far and wide for all to see and was described by Joe Biden as being part of the group of people who were the bravest ever in the whole wide world ever.

I suppose I can imagine Russian propaganda on social media promoting transgender as an aspiration. Getting kids to sign up to it.

But it couldn't have exploded without the apathy of successive governments.

nolongersurprised · 10/11/2024 11:21

GailBlancheViola · 10/11/2024 11:17

The Chinese didn’t put Rachel Levine in the White House, or hire the non binary luggage stealer, did they?

Or the TW who exposed and played with extreme enjoyment with their (artificial) breasts on the White House Lawn at an event organised by Joe Biden and published it far and wide for all to see and was described by Joe Biden as being part of the group of people who were the bravest ever in the whole wide world ever.

I remember that! Topless and caressing themselves. At The White House!

I think a pixelated version was aired on Fox, no need for “amplification” when millions would see it on the news

RedToothBrush · 10/11/2024 11:21

A lot of the problem I have, is the writing was on the wall about these issues 8 years ago.

I am a centrist and I've talked about this. I was (and still am) against Brexit.

But I eventually got fed up with the most hardcore Remainers because of their arrogance, tone deafness and unwillingness to listen.

It's the underlying shit that's fuelling dissatisfaction that is being ignored time and again that's really behind this. A huge part is growing inequality.

nolongersurprised · 10/11/2024 11:22

Datun · 10/11/2024 11:20

I suppose I can imagine Russian propaganda on social media promoting transgender as an aspiration. Getting kids to sign up to it.

But it couldn't have exploded without the apathy of successive governments.

By that reasoning, the entirety of Reddit is Russian propaganda

NotBadConsidering · 10/11/2024 11:24

nolongersurprised · 10/11/2024 11:21

I remember that! Topless and caressing themselves. At The White House!

I think a pixelated version was aired on Fox, no need for “amplification” when millions would see it on the news

And “man gets tits out on White House lawn” isn’t exactly a story that would have slipped into obscurity if it wasn’t for the mythical bots.

Shortshriftandlethal · 10/11/2024 11:25

Tandora · 10/11/2024 10:07

The majority of children who go on PBs continue onto CSH because PBs are being accurately prescribed to children who are trans and in desperate need of healthcare. This is because PBs are only prescribed after careful assessment to those children who need them.

Once again...the 'trans child' is a construct used to describe children who struggle with their developing self or who are naturally non conforming with societal stereotypes. Usually they are gay or on the autistic spectrum. Some have suffered childhood sexual or other abuse. and wish to escape the reality of their sexed body.

Calling the surgical removal of healthy body parts, or the prescription of drugs which block natural processes health care, is actually the complete opposite to what it is.

RapidOnsetGenderCritic · 10/11/2024 11:27

Tandora · 10/11/2024 00:41

Sorry I was out of action this evening, I meant to return to this.

whether your body is designed around the production of large or small gametes ..." "Small gamete producers" and "large gamete producers" are both shorthand for the above.

“designed” and “shorthand” are key: I entirely agree with you. But the idea of “design” is value laden- religious almost. It conveys an idea of how things were meant to be. That’s not how evolution works. Evaluation is simply a string of random mutations that exist within particular environmental conditions. We can argue about what was “meant to be” , but what matters really is what is.

As for “shorthand”- agree- this is a shorthand. What we have is an oversimplification.

I would be happy for someone to suggest an alternative to "designed", but it does not necessarily imply an intelligent designer. Biologists have often used the word "strategy" in the context of an evolutionary advantage; that is not meant to imply that chameleons have chosen to camouflage themselves.

Shorthand does not mean oversimplification. Edge cases do not mean that our understanding is fundamentally wrong. Quantum mechanics, for example, does not invalidate Newtonian mechanics when playing pool or snooker.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread