"Trump is the only hope for the world. I hope Americans can see this."

[crimplepop]

KJK going off on one again. Can you see it yet?

Am I missing something? Where does it say they broke in, carrying weapons, with the intention of mayhem and murder? Where does it say they were violent at all?
It does in fact say they did not resist arrest.

"No one appeared to resist arrest. Capitol Police lightly tapped protesters on the shoulder to stand up, arrested them with white zip ties and escorted them out of the building slowly."

The Jan 6 rioters, OTOH, killed a police officer and attacked others. Fifteen officers were injured.
Not remotely comparable.

According to Trump they allow abortions after birth too.

They are called ‘partial birth abortions’

So committing mayhem upon legislators going about their work can be a protest?

This - although she's been at it for years.

She's never had any shame about being divisive or undermining or causing controversy to boost her ego. It's what she's all about and what many of us have been trying to say for years.

Most of us started off thinking she was great. Heck, I risked arrest climbing around in the middle of the night putting her bloody tshirts on statues, and I've even lost friends through standing up for her.

Many of us who have been ringing the alarm about KJK for a while know her in real life, not just online, and realised for ourselves because of her behaviour, that she's in this for herself, not for women, despite what she says. It was a huge disappointment, I really did want her to be the real deal. What a shame.

KJK thrives on contraversy. She's not about actual change. She's a poison in our movement. (And yes, it is a movement, before people start). Her words put a target on all our backs and she does not give a fuck. Not about me, or you.

However, she certainly is gifted at creating a narrative, and pulling people along with her. She's not on these boards anymore, but goodness her presence is, with her followers faithfully repeating her narratives.

I wish Magdalen Berns was still around. For a million reasons, but in this moment because there is no way she would stand for this shit. She and KJK were friends, sure. But Magdalen had a solid political foundations. No way would she stand by silent while KJK promoted the fucking grab-em-by-the-pussy, anti-women's rights felon and would-be dictator Trump. She'd have something to say about it, I'd bet my house on it.

The term 'partial birth abortion' is a right wing term. That is not the technical term for them. The term was deliberately coined to further a particular agenda.

Linked below is an article explaining' what this actually is. The following bit jumped out at me -

'And contrary to the claims of some abortion opponents, most such abortions do not take place in the third trimester of pregnancy, or after fetal "viability." Indeed, when some members of Congress tried to amend the bill to ban only those procedures that take place after viability, abortion opponents complained that would leave most of the procedures legal.'

'Partial-Birth Abortion': Separating Fact From Spin : NPR

I am not quite sure what you are denying? Trump is right wing so would take a right wing view. In these abortions (which your article states did include some that took places in the third trimester) the foetus is partly outside the mother when their life is ended. That Trump and many of his followers would consider this ‘after birth’ is consistent.

@LongtailedTitmouse Are you being deliberately silly?

I think there's little doubt she has funding from and connections with US conservative groups. She received funding from them in the past for her flights abroad; that much is known. She is in the US now and has just appeared on the Megyn Kelly show. Google Kelly at your peril.

KJK started off her round of Trump tweets yesterday with a corker: 'I hope Trump metaphorically crushes Kamala Harris'. What type of sentiment is that, particularly for the so-called leader of the Party of Women?

That's mad! What was she thinking?

Nope. The means of termination happens while the fetus is still inside the woman's body, making death an inevitability no matter whether it happens 100% inside the body or not.
That's entirely different than a killing done after birth. After birth that is a citizen with rights, so it is completely illegal.

Nobody commited mayhem in your example and your own link proved it.
What part of that don't you get?

You mean you argue against your cats' views?

🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀🙀

That's entirely different than a killing done after birth. After birth that is a citizen with rights, so it is completely illegal.

Unless you live in Belgium, Netherlands, possibly Canada,

”Capitol Police said approximately 150 people were “illegally and violently protesting”. It said six officers were treated for injuries, ranging from cuts to being pepper sprayed and punched.
“One person has been arrested for assault on an officer,” Capitol Police said on social media.”

How do you define mayhem?

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/11/16/us-capitol-police-clash-with-protesters-calling-for-gaza-war-ceasefire

I see the goal posts have been moved. This is a completely different event than the one referenced earlier, which is what I responded to.
Try your games on somebody else.

Roland Fryer's research - also out of Harvard - didn't come to the same conclusion. And arguably looked at the much more relevant measure of what happens within actual encounters between the police and criminals.

"Unassailable fact" is rather strong, under the circumstances.

I'm afraid that's not the case. His research actually found racial bias. He found POC were more likely to be targeted for non-lethal force. It was specifically in fatal police shootings that he determined there was no evidence of bias.

Be that as it may, critics found mathematical errors in his research, data that was either used misleadingly or was outright false, and that his protocol was faulty.

First post on here OP?

@CrochetForLife

First post on here OP?

Does it matter? You know regular users can change names, right?

If you don't see that KJK has increasingly extreme right wing links both in Britain and in the US, that's fine. It's okay for other people to point them out though.

"I see it's your first post on here" vs "I see the usual parties have appeared to say their usual piece."

It's a lose-lose

Could well be both of course.

It’s like clockwork. Must be a calendar reminder that pops up. “Post monthly KJK thread”.

Yes. Maybe she has a reminder to post a controversial fight thread on twitter every month? Who knows.

If that’s the case, why do people fall for it and start threads on MN about KJK’s tweets? How weak minded. As pp have said, she lives rent free in some people’s heads.

Well, KJK does provide plenty of fodder ... and that might be at the heart of it all.