Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions
Thread gallery
21
JanesLittleGirl · 25/02/2024 15:51

Annoying though it is, it is possible that it is impossible to exclude transwomen from the Ladies' pond despite the single sex exemptions in the EA. The argument for exclusion is that it is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

Ordinarily, the privacy and dignity of women would be a legitimate aim and exclusion of transwomen is a proportionate means as there is a mixed sex pond. The fly in the ointment is topless sunbathing. Women, in order to preserve their privacy and dignity, want to sunbathe topless away from male eyes.

However, there are a small number of transwomen who have enlarged breasts as a result of medical intervention. They could argue that exclusion would either remove their access to topless sunbathing or deprive them of their privacy and dignity by forcing them to expose their breasts to the possibly prurient gaze of other men.

You would hope that any judge would reject this argument but there is no guarantee.

PP82 · 25/02/2024 15:51

Grammarnut · 25/02/2024 15:48

Some women (XX people) may be happy not to have segregated spaces for XX people but you cannot realistically make that decision for other XX people, who do not want to share spaces with XY people during some activities. I don't know if the XX pond is nicer than the XY or mixed pond but some XX people want it only to be used by XX people and the XY pond does not seem to be open to XX people even if they ID as XY, so I am happy for the XX pond to stay XX.

You don't get to make a decision about who else gets to use the same spaces as you. Just like how most people wanting immigration controls doesn't mean immigration controls are OK. It's the same issue writ large.

PP82 · 25/02/2024 15:54

PP82 · 25/02/2024 15:48

I'm not particularly disgruntled. On a personal level I'm very happy. I'm certainly concerned about the direction that the world is taking. The climate crisis, the continued rise of the populist right, the migrant crisis, Ukraine, Gaza.

I certainly think that trans people should be treated according to their gender identity, and that excluding or othering them is cruel. I don't feel the need to define or justify that, as I'm not actively campaigning about it, just chatting on the internet.

But what makes me really angry, even more so than that, is that while the world is burning, there are a whole group of people who think that the most important issue is who uses which loo or swims in which pond. The world is I'm crisis and that is where you are directing your energies??? Despite what you may think, I am not a fan of identity politics. I just argue with you lot because you relish in misgendering just to be cruel. Using the right pronouns is good manners. People's feelings do matter. But there are people every day drowning trying to reach Europe, and you are all obsessed with toilets and whether an NHS trust uses gender neutral language. I haven't thought these issues through much because they are so trivial! I'm just here because I find your psychology grimly fascinating and find exploring your world view interesting. I'm not captured by anything or anyone. I'm bemused is all, that in the current climate this is what you are all focusing on.

I was responding to a poster who was characterising me. That's why.

Ohnohedident · 25/02/2024 15:55

AlisonDonut · 25/02/2024 14:00

Private Healthcare is the so Anarchy, yay.

I think pp82 is more of what we would call a libertarian than an anarchist.

An extreamly authoritarian libertarian

Baldieheid · 25/02/2024 15:55

JanesLittleGirl · 25/02/2024 15:51

Annoying though it is, it is possible that it is impossible to exclude transwomen from the Ladies' pond despite the single sex exemptions in the EA. The argument for exclusion is that it is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

Ordinarily, the privacy and dignity of women would be a legitimate aim and exclusion of transwomen is a proportionate means as there is a mixed sex pond. The fly in the ointment is topless sunbathing. Women, in order to preserve their privacy and dignity, want to sunbathe topless away from male eyes.

However, there are a small number of transwomen who have enlarged breasts as a result of medical intervention. They could argue that exclusion would either remove their access to topless sunbathing or deprive them of their privacy and dignity by forcing them to expose their breasts to the possibly prurient gaze of other men.

You would hope that any judge would reject this argument but there is no guarantee.

Has there been a reverse of this in the men's pond? A female who has had a double mastectomy, so is now without breasts? Who is trans identified, I mean? I could be wrong but it seems the men are quite protective of their space, so it may not have been challenged. Man Friday wasn't Tms, was it?

PP82 · 25/02/2024 15:58

Ohnohedident · 25/02/2024 15:55

I think pp82 is more of what we would call a libertarian than an anarchist.

An extreamly authoritarian libertarian

Nope. Just an anarcho communist hypocrite. Or a libertarian socialist hypocrite. I'm fine with either label. I don't believe in capitalism. But I have to live under it, and prefer to do so comfortably.

Ohnohedident · 25/02/2024 16:00

PP82 · 25/02/2024 14:12

Lol. I used to talk like this 20 years ago. I generally don't any more, being in my 40s and all that.

But something about the pearl clutching Victorian prudishness and constant obsession with rules and boundaries on here brings it back out in me. Y'all need to chill!

infantalism, always the last refuge.

'Im only joking you know, why you being so uptight, its just bantz'

Dontcallmescarface · 25/02/2024 16:01

People's feelings do matter

And yet

I haven't thought these issues through much because they are so trivial

So do our feelings matter or are they trivial?

Ohnohedident · 25/02/2024 16:02

PP82 · 25/02/2024 14:16

Oh for god sake. Anyone who's been active on the left throws in the odd, usually self satirising, 'after the revolution.' Doesn't mean we think it's imminent. Grandad never gave up hope. But he was very realistic. That's how and why he made enough money for me to afford private healthcare.

your not on the left.

gender idology is pure capatilism and colonalism on steroids

RebelliousCow · 25/02/2024 16:05

PP82 · 25/02/2024 14:19

Well done. Your lurch to the right shows enormous maturity.

Your obviously tribal predictability, doesn't. It can be read like a book by those familiar with it.

Barbie222 · 25/02/2024 16:05

There's a lot of hiding and minimising here, @PP82 . It's perfectly possible to be concerned about more than one issue affecting the world. You don't get to decide what is and isn't trivial. As has been patiently explained to you many times, it's often necessary to have facilities separated by age, sex or other protected characteristics, otherwise vulnerable people aren't safeguarded effectively enough.

Can I suggest that if you don't think about these issues much, as you admit, you do some more listening and learning here? There's a lot of really interesting perspectives, sound research and exceptionally well thought through philosophy on this board - I continue to be amazed at what I find out and read here.

PP82 · 25/02/2024 16:06

Dontcallmescarface · 25/02/2024 16:01

People's feelings do matter

And yet

I haven't thought these issues through much because they are so trivial

So do our feelings matter or are they trivial?

Our as in whom?

PP82 · 25/02/2024 16:08

Ohnohedident · 25/02/2024 16:02

your not on the left.

gender idology is pure capatilism and colonalism on steroids

I think that the vast majority of the left would disagree.

Tankies excepted of course.

Baldieheid · 25/02/2024 16:09

Meeeeeeeeeeeeee.

Meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.

Ahem.

Ponds. Spaces separated by sex and with one mixed sex, gender neutral space where whoever wishes to mix can, with impunity.

Wonder why it's not working?

RebelliousCow · 25/02/2024 16:09

Ohnohedident · 25/02/2024 16:02

your not on the left.

gender idology is pure capatilism and colonalism on steroids

Quite! Gender ideology is pure post modernistic, individualistic consumerism. Nothing radical about it at all - except in its blind denial of reality.

Rejection of capitalism is predicated on a materialist analysis of society, yet when it comes to the material reality of sex and how that effects us, especially women, it is ignored by gender ideologues.

You don't empower women by denying their biological reality and encouraging the colonisation and appropriation of womanhood and women's spaces by males.

Ohnohedident · 25/02/2024 16:11

Peskysquirrel · 25/02/2024 15:24

She appears confused and desperate for attention.

Hmmm...🤔

😂

Datun · 25/02/2024 16:13

that yes I'm coming on the toilet their husbands are just being confused.

God knows what AutoCorrect had in mind there!!

Girlontherailreplacementbusservice · 25/02/2024 16:13

PP82 · 25/02/2024 16:06

Our as in whom?

So you think some people's feels matter but other people don't? Again I assume you are the self appointed arbiter of who falls into matter category and who doesn't.

RebelliousCow · 25/02/2024 16:13

PP82 · 25/02/2024 16:08

I think that the vast majority of the left would disagree.

Tankies excepted of course.

Actually the only true Socialist party - The Communist Party - is critical of gender ideology. What you are supporting is a bastardised, americanised hybrid - 'progressive identity politics' and social jutice theories - which has very little to do with the traditional left - which was predicated on a materialist analysis of society.

PP82 · 25/02/2024 16:13

Ohnohedident · 25/02/2024 16:11

😂

I'm not desperate for attention. I have a million things to do and a chronic procrastination problem. And I find you all very diverting.

Ohnohedident · 25/02/2024 16:14

PP82 · 25/02/2024 16:08

I think that the vast majority of the left would disagree.

Tankies excepted of course.

ooo, was that an insult.
how very male of you to insult my feminity

RebelliousCow · 25/02/2024 16:14

PP82 · 25/02/2024 16:13

I'm not desperate for attention. I have a million things to do and a chronic procrastination problem. And I find you all very diverting.

When, and if, you eventually have a child you'll have far less time, and most probably inclination...so enjoy it while you can.

PP82 · 25/02/2024 16:17

RebelliousCow · 25/02/2024 16:14

When, and if, you eventually have a child you'll have far less time, and most probably inclination...so enjoy it while you can.

Edited

Well quite.

Ohnohedident · 25/02/2024 16:18

Girlontherailreplacementbusservice · 25/02/2024 16:13

So you think some people's feels matter but other people don't? Again I assume you are the self appointed arbiter of who falls into matter category and who doesn't.

I going to suggest a way to find out whos feels matter and whos dont to pp82

here goes

do they have a cock, or not

PP82 · 25/02/2024 16:18

Ohnohedident · 25/02/2024 16:14

ooo, was that an insult.
how very male of you to insult my feminity

How did I manage that?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread