Yes oldcrone.
It felt like grasping sand most of the time in that conversation. I suspect a very confused person, who thought they were well educated and articulate, was posting.
I will post studies etc.
But I suspect that evie is like some others who have journeyed through these conversations. That they do know biological sex doesn’t change, and that women do need sex based provisions and protections. BUT, that they are so caught up in the emotional side due to their friends that they really cannot reconcile what they know with being the kind of person that evie wants to feel they are. The inconsistencies are there and very easy to be seen.
It is a version of ‘you are right, but you can’t say it that way- that is mean’. And ‘I agree women need to be protected, there is a compromise to be had but you just haven’t looked for it’!!!
When, yes, we are blunt- it is great to be able to say something and have it clearly understood.
And yes, been there done all the work on solutions, and nothing suggested was accepted.
I think if evieowlette did what many of us did and lurked and read first, then they might have had intelligent conversations yesterday. There is agreeance there, but the prejudice held by evieowlette about women on this board will not allow them to see that.