Can we have a Daily Mail apprection thread after this article?!

[55balloons]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11995903/The-new-face-extremism-unmasked-Republicans-watching-trantifa.html

Well done Reem Alaselem. Now the UN are on board.

Haha. Bernard you are on 🔥🔥🔥🔥

Yes, the lack of respect this person shows for their fellow citizens is actually quite breathtaking

You did refer to the DM as a "wank rag".. But whatever you do in your own time is your own business.. Whatever turns you on. No judgement here 👍

I think @CherryPosset is another (possibly Guardian?!) reader who has come along to re-educate the icky, silly proles from thinking how and reading what they choose, and to let then know that the only way to be fabulously inclusive is to think and do EXACTLY what the 'correct, good' people tell them to?

Well, stap my vitals. Apparently I'm a malleable, working class, uneducated, angry proletariat with an axe to grind. Not to mention a man.

I think it's safe to say that @CherryPosset doesn't read the Mail and heartily despises anyone who does. I'm not sure that level of vitriol was quite called for, but I hope it made her feel better.

Rehabilitated from what?

I’m genuinely enjoying quite how irrational the subject of a mainstream national newspaper makes some people

isn’t it funny what pushes people’s buttons (not you seasonofthewitch )

Its dank, nasty history, its sexism and misogyny, xenophobia, racism, you name it.

Wrong think and wrong read 🤣🤣

I also would not look down on someone who read it.
This isn't helpful.
What I would hope is that eventually people might come to be more discerning about what they allow into their skulls.

No news source should have a political bias, let alone such an unashamedly obvious one.
News ought to be impartial and unbiased essentially, as we require that to know we are not being cajoled into beliefs and opinions that are not our own.

I also would never take any news outlet seriously that described child abusers as 'beasts', women as 'teases' and people from other cultures as 'bizarre'.

Similarly I do not respect left leaning tabloids. Most of these publications make it their sole aim to create anger, hatred and fear, rather that empowering us with information. Even the Guardian has become a tabloid in my eyes. They are all rancid at this point.

If something is trying to alter or form your opinion, it isn't your friend.

I love the idea that when our more righteous and saintly publications produce headlines such as "woman in court for flashing and stealing underwear" or "female athlete on attempted murder charge" they're not after the clicks.

No news source should have a political bias

🤣🤣🤣

oh you sweet summer child

D Mail generally considered more emetic than erotic Molluscs. Works for many.

Wrong think obviously @MrsDanversGlidesAgain? They must now undergo a public full disadulation.

Yeah, that made me laugh, as well.

No news source should have a political bias, let alone such an unashamedly obvious one.

It's impossible for them not to. They have to decide what to prioritise to report on.

It's probably better that they are open about their political agenda so you can read it knowingly in that light, rather than be fooled into thinking they're reporting perfectly balanced, objective, unbiased truth...which no human could ever do.

Not everything you disagree with has to (or should....) be compared to a National Socialist equivalent.

The DM isn't my cup of tea. But it isn't comparable to National Socialist publications...

@BernardBlacksMolluscs exactly..
Any media outlet who is highlighting the castration, mutilation, sterilisation & hormone pumping of children should be celebrated right?

Any media who is reporting on men muscling into & infiltrating women's spaces need to be commended?

Very odd that anyone who wants rapid change is opposed to an outlet who is really getting the word out there about what exactly is going down.

Gript are also excellent.

You're talking about the Grundiad here? You missed totally making things up.

I wonder what news sources @CherryPosset considers to be free from political bias?

the bbc perhaps?

Being the Daily Mail, basically. And a lot more profitable and widely read than the Graun; which I suppose just shows that malleable, working class, uneducated, angry proletariat with an axe to grind rules when it comes to making money.

This is satire, right? I'm calling it.

Isn't unashamedly open political bias better than "fake neutrality" and dog whistles?

Well this is trending now, so helpful for ordinary people to know that wanting to read about child safeguarding and womens rights issues makes them comedy thickos.

I appreciate that it's not behind a paywall. Same with the Guardian.