Can we have a Daily Mail apprection thread after this article?!

[55balloons]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11995903/The-new-face-extremism-unmasked-Republicans-watching-trantifa.html

Well done Reem Alaselem. Now the UN are on board.

I've never said I don't read the Mail?
I do read the online version.
I just think people are deluded if they think coverage on this topic is coming from a we care about women angle.

Duly noted

It would be more persuasive if you could spell ‘ misogynistic ‘ correctly. Or use spell check….

It's such naive, simplistic thinking.

"I don't like this newspaper so I'm going to either ignore or hate what they say, even when I know they are not only right, but are the only people saying it. I'm also going to tell everyone that they are wrong to agree with the right thing even though we all know they are not".

It's childish. "Daily Mail bad, Guardian good"...well guess what lads, the Guardian are selling your rights down the river and the DM are shouting about how fucking bad it is. You don't have to profess love for the DM, just don't be such a dick about them when you know they are right on this issue....

I liked this one from DM

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12192097/Lesbian-non-man-attracted-non-man-university-says-sparking-outrage-JK-Rowling.html

This board has always been infiltrated by TRAs posing as mumsnetters as some posters on here prove...
Oh, here we go. Anyone disagreeing is a TRA infiltrator 🙄
It's beyond pathetic.
I'm not trans, I'm not an activist, I'm not a man.
Just a woman who disagrees with you.
Sorry if that doesn't fit the narrative you've painted in your head.

Ahh the great thing about being vegetarian is that I've been nazi-adjacent for so long I've got used to it! My delicate lady mind can cope with accusations of poor tone; lack of decorum; saying it wrong; speaking to the wrong people and reading the wrong news source.

This is gonna sound crazy but I read different articles from many publications (yay internet!) and perspectives and critically analyse to form my own viewpoint. I even allow myself to change my delicate lady mind if presented with enough evidence to counter what I thought I already knew!

I get that this might be a bit too gender non conforming for some though. Maybe I don't have a lady mind after all.

Daily Mail appreciation thread in the supposed feminism section? Only on MN.

Why did you immediately jump to the assumption that that poster meant you?

Shut up women, stop reading naughty and mean things about men and the erosion of women’s rights.

You mean the DM that fucking hates women, a right wing tory wank rag? No thanks.

@BodgerLovesMashedPotato I asked you twice upthread to provide an example of a media publication more invested & committed to the cause than the Daily Mail but you are conveniently ignoring my question! Can you provide the name of one please?

And stop reading those unapproved publications. Even if they do have good writers in the money section.

Nobody's said that though, have they.

Lol lol 😂

Tick
tick
tick

keep the knee jerk virtue signalling coming, I’m genuinely enjoying it

But... but.... they care about women 😕

The lady doth protest too much, methinks 😉😉

Stuck under a hot, grouchy bf newborn, and all I can think of now is fruitcake and some Wensleydale!

can one not extrapolate it from the ‘anyone who reads that rag is a right wing fruitcake’ comments?

(and for the avoidance of doubt I know you didn’t say that)

For a paper that hates women's rights they're doing a bloody good job of defending them.

Also, wank rag? In what respect?

does the DM content routinely make you want to masturbate?

Yer on a roll, BBM.

Imagine, a corner of the internet that doesn't require group think and a purity spiral!

To quote a favourite film, oh mnetters, 'shock me, shock me shock me with that deviant behaviour of yours'!'