Yes I agree about the public interest here (although I don’t think they should be going back as far as school days).
The ‘most vulnerable minority’ claim is a travesty and makes a mockery of genuinely vulnerable groups and this incident has put the a spotlight on the intolerance and aggressive tactics used ostensibly to protect trans people but actually causing a lot of harm.
I find the hypocrisy sickening too.
Someone so woke and sensitised to trauma and persecution attacking a woman in this way? He very well knew the customer wasn’t called Karen so it was a deliberate misnaming and not any old name, a known derisive slur. He didn’t call her ‘a Karen’, he used it as a name ‘you’re being transphobic Karen’. Quite serious for someone dedicated to defending identity rights? A person’s name is a pretty significant identifier.