I posted what I thought the context was under the transcript. I was clear about what I thought the context was.
You have done nothing but repeat 'the language was violent' and the assertion that 'She’s joking about violence against trans women'.
No. She was calling for men to enter female single sex spaces. And I disagreed with her.
She also wanted to show how ridiculous Self ID was. Did you miss that point?
"that's one of the many ways that you are going to have to combat the insanity of self-ID Even if it's not called self-ID, that's pretty much what you have, now, in the United States"
She is making a point that any male who simply says they are a woman can enter female single sex spaces.
In what way have you engaged with me that is any different from the way I have engage with you?
"and you keep asking me for hard truths, evidence and word for word specifics (you have to look at the whole)."
No kidding! Did you see me post the transcript of another video and say just that - look at the whole!
"We are talking about language, politics and philisophy where hard truths don’t really exist like you think they do because speeches/writing can be interpreted differently."
No kidding!
Hence, me asking you for the words that made you form you clearly prejudiced opinion. And me repeatedly stating you have made a bad faith interpretation.