Fck it. Just going to identify as agender as a GC feminist.

[Metabigot]

I'm technically agender anyway as I choose to not believe in gender woo.

If males can infiltrate feminism by saying they're women I'm infiltrating transgendersism by identifying as agender.

If I'm asked my gender identity why shouldn't I say this, it's technically true according to stonewall.

Quite like the idea of being a double agent of sorts....

So have you also been on TRA Twitter telling them not to be gleeful and spiteful, and to stop the rape and death threats? Why is it only women who are expected to ‘watch their tone’ and not be mean?

Ooooh that's a good one. Pity the flag is deeply unattractive.

That's a shame! The flag is key. Guess I'll have to stick with AHF and the suffragette colours.

Now for someone who gets so utterly offended by inaccurate statements, you've done the same.

My point was, if I made a thread mocking women, I'd be piled on. You agreed that may well happen.

But it's OK to do it to trans people.

Now what word would we use when we allow bad behaviour towards one group of people purely based on a characteristic?

this is such a straw man, because it's not them that the thread is mocking, is it?

Equality?

So, to sum up this thread (graphic also taken from Tumblr):

That’s us TOLD.

My point was, if I made a thread mocking women, I'd be piled on. You agreed that may well happen.

I literally couldn't care less whether or not you do that and what response you receive.

Do you usually mock and take the piss out of people?

Interesting deflection, but you didn't answer my question.

Yes.

oh, so a thread on here mocking and degrading women would be OK, would it?

thought not.

Stop gatekeepong. Everyone is non-binary, except possibly Kylie Minogue and Gerard Butler. The rest of us are on a spectrum somewhere between these two.

I thought everyone had a gender identity, according to the ideology? Even those who object to it? Who say they don't believe in the ideology? In which case, surely mocking the ideology is ultimately mocking oneself?

Interesting deflection, but you didn't answer my question.

As you rightly pointed out, it's not Question Time or a university debate. Like you, we all answer the points we think are most interesting.

Because even if I disagree with views, I wouldn't mock them and call them ridiculous.

but you would call them mean, tedious, bullying, boring, nasty… you really aren’t averse to name-calling and labelling.

Quite.

Everyone has the right to take the piss out of anyone that they want.

🤣

I do love a good graphic. Pity that isn’t a good graphic. It’s a bit like @placewherewebelong‘s arguments. Dull and humourless

We should not tar the 1% with the actions of the 99%, that’s true.

Not only on Twitter, it’s also when you are saying it on here.

Spiteful, mean spirited, lacking a sense of irony.

I forgot all those. Is there a single post without an insult directed at other posters?

I called someones views towards taking them off social media, because it is.

I called someone tedious for saying the same thing about 8 times, purely to try and provoke a pile on.

I called the chat about ponies and identifiying as a carrot mean and nasty as they are.

Which one of those is mocking and sneering of someone's gender identity?

You could say the same of numerous posters towards me. Will you? Or is it only OK if you are in the MN group that lord it over other people?

Fantastic.

So the way the nutters speak about women on twitter is fine, then?

Does this theory actually help anyone? Or is it just a permanent game of he hit me first?