@Iknowitisheresomewhere
I am so fed up with ‘TWAW but I support women only spaces’. It means nothing because that person’s definition of women includes men.
Interviewers are going to have to be very clear. ‘Do you support single sex spaces ie only for biological females’ or ‘given you think TWAW, what is your word for ‘human of the female sex’ (which includes everyone of that sex and excludes everyone not of that sex). Do you support spaces (prisons, hospital wards) exclusively for those people?’
YES
Come on Kier - you’re a smart chap. Explain to me how your changes to the GRC are going to effect me. spoiler - they are
Stop referring to the inhumane nature of the process and start actually telling us what is inhumane about the current pathway.
As I see it, there are provisions under the current Eq Act which companies and organisations are choosing not to enable ie single sex space.
Not ignoring the fucking mess of sports, healthcare, prisons etc…
So, what is different about your GRC and what is going to be the effects of it, in my day to day life.
If TWAW and natal women are women. There are no single SEX spaces.
Currently, TW are different in biology & law (provision for single sex spaces). Do you want to change this?
So currently in law, TW are not women but TW.
& YES to the timid, bland, partisan interviewers. I’m not a fucking idiot. Stop reducing this argument to soundbites and biased pro trans emotional interest stories. Give me some fucking facts for a change. That’s right - engage your brain and your journo training.
Pitch it to the execs, that you’ll get higher viewing figures, if you dared to step out of the rose tinted beige.