What is most extraordinary about that essay is that the author says "When children’s author J. K. Rowling accused the trans rights movement of ‘offering cover to [sexual] predators’ in a June 2020 article" but then in her (scholarly) footnotes gives a link to the complete article, which is so clearly not bigoted etc that anyone who bothers to read as opposed to just assuming they already know all about it must surely notice what it actually has to say.
The word she has misused in her essay is "accused". JK Rowling pointed out what could happen as a result of a particular thing; she accused nobody apart perhaps from predators. Surely the nice Quaker student doesn't approve of predators, does she? The word sexual there is her own, since JKR didn't use it in that passage; that is in itself poor scholarship even if in square brackets.
And yes, I can only manage guttural in speech, not in writing.