@Cam77
Many people were cheering when Trump got kicked off Twitter, for an inane rant no worse than a 100 he’d done before. I thought it had fairly sinister overtones though. As much as I hate Trump, he was the fairly elected leader of the biggest (power wise) democracy on Earth. And yet a couple of rich fandoms nobody has voted for effectively are able to silence him from one of the biggest social networks/discussion pages on the planet.
Banning is all fun and games until it’s your turn next.
If I understand your point correctly, I think it is important to remember that the objections are not to AC having gainful employment or enjoying freedom of speech (same as the rest of us), but it is a major concern that AC has yet another job that wields considerable power and influence over narrative and information.
It is interesting that at such a young age, AC has held so many positions of quite significant influence. When they were guiding policy in the Green Party, they must have been only just over 20! It is also interesting that, given the debacle with the GP - they have deleted much of their fawning support, that AC continues to gain support and influence.
AC also has been given access to vulnerable people and as pp's horrifying story above attests, this access to people and information can be misused in a terrible way. AC is not a suitable or safe person to be doing the job they are paid to do.