PlanDeRaccordement
The title irritates me too “violent history of white womanhood” and the only thing they explain that as is how historically white men felt they should protect white women from nonwhite men
Yet they fail to acknowledge that this time in history wasn’t white women demanding protection and ordering white men to be violent to preserve their white womanhood. This was from a patriarchal place of white men viewing white women as their personal property and that they were not going to allow any woman of theirs (daughter, sister, ex girlfriend, etc) to have a relationship with a nonwhite man.
In addition, the violence that occurred was primarily directed against the nonwhite man but often also included harming the white woman for her relations with a nonwhite man. There were many many women murdered by angry fathers, brothers, etc because they’d dishonoured the family by walking out with a nonwhite man. The misogynist phrase “damaged goods” comes from that part of history. The woman is merely “goods” an owned thing, and she is “damaged” because she’s been ruined by her association with a nonwhite man and so what do you do with “damaged goods” ? You get rid, you throw them on the streets to be homeless prostitutes or you quietly murder them and stick a fake suicide note by the body
See - how is this just not passing the blame to everyone else but yourself? (yourself being general yourself, for want of context, a "Karen?" )
As in, if I cry, and say I need protecting from the scary man, even if the scary man hasn't done anything {I'm thinking of the New York Central Park incident here for example)
by your argument it's not really my fault because the patriarchy has made it their business to look after their women "property" so I'm just doing it because I don't know any better/that's the way it is/to stop myself being dishonoured if a black man came near me.
I mean, I'm sorry, but WTF I just can't comprehend that mindset.
It's akin in this context to saying a white woman can never be wrong because men.
Always the victim, whatever the circumstances.
I find that much more offensive than the name Karen being used for calling out behaviour.