Rewriting my post as just noticed the part I quoted has some banned terms and I don't want to lose it all if it gets deleted, as I think it's quite useful:
Spero
It is my real fear that efforts to silence uppity terfs one way or another are reaching a crescendo. What more effective way than through our children?
As I said earlier they have tried this before. I have a download of the original CPS/Gendered Intelligence "anti bullying" schools pack from 2017 on my laptop. In which they had a scenario where a girl sees an adult male using the women's toilets. And also use the words "hate crime" talking about children questioning trans identity. The key difference is that they didn't try to keep it secret then.
Categories of anti-LGBT hate crime or LGBT hate incidents
• Ostracising and excluding from friendship groups for reasons of sexual orientation, perceived sexual orientation, gender identity or perceived gender identity.
• Outing someone as gay or transgender”
This means that girls cannot exclude any boy who identifies as a girl from a friendship group, girls are no longer entitled to female-only spaces. Correctly identifying males as males is reclassified as ‘outing’ them, which is a hate crime.
Case Study 5: Toilet choice
This is the most manipulative scenario; the one that all the previous shaming of girls leads up to. Having been immersed in LGBT case scenarios, class discussions, writing exercises and a thorough grounding in hate crime sentencing guidelines, girls are finally led, unknowingly, to the erosion of their sex-based rights and protections....
Scenario: An MTF trans person enters a women's toilet, where a couple of school girls ask why the person is in the toilet as it is not the toilet appropriate for their sex. The MTF trans person then goes to the male toilets where they are confronted by some stereotypical thuggish men.
... The most physically threatening man bangs on the toilet door, yelling “what you doing in there? You freak!” No teenager, male or female, would want to align themselves with the views of these old past-it men who clearly represent ‘old-fashioned ignorance.’ Their physically threatening response and offensive language paints them clearly as pantomime baddies.
The most insidious suggestion in this case scenario though, is that it was the women‘s fault for not accepting a male into their toilet. It is women’s job to protect males from male violence, by rolling over and allowing males into their toilets. The message is clear: women are responsible for male violence. Teenage boys get off scot free by not being represented in either ‘transgender’ scenario and the reactions of girls and young women are aligned with the bigotry of old men.
https://www.transgendertrend.com/cps-schools-project-the-erasure-of-sex-and-the-silencing-of-girls/