Stephanie Hayden takes Graham Linehan to court for doxxing

[ItsAllGoingToBeFine]

Their statement is here:

twitter.com/flyinglawyer73/status/1046792462067519489?s=19

@BettyDuKeiraBellisMyShero

That, JJ, is ‘shitposting’.

Maybe you need to spend some time with the under 50s?

I'm well aware what shitposting is, doxing is rather more than that.

You were complaining about the language. JJ.

I already responded to your accusations re: doxing. Maybe try telling off your fellow transactivists?

Telling off feminists for doxing feminists seems a bit, well, victim blamey, doesn’t it?

Finished that thread and now falling down the rabbit holes of some of our other ‘friends’!

Eye opening isn’t it? The internet never forgets.

@BettyDuKeiraBellisMyShero

You were complaining about the language. JJ.

I already responded to your accusations re: doxing. Maybe try telling off your fellow transactivists?

Telling off feminists for doxing feminists seems a bit, well, victim blamey, doesn’t it?

The wars I saw on those threads seemed to be very much GC activists vs other GC activists so I don't know why you're trying to hold trans people responsible.

Crikey JJ, you do appear to spend an awful lot of time on that site, the one you berate others for.

Have you seen the language used on that site. The way they talk about race and sexuality, the words they use? Who else talks like that? I'm sure many of them are overgrown teenagers but that doesn;t mean there aren't more insiduous forces on there.

Despite you attempting to taint the women on here by association, that's not the point. It's irrelevant.

The point is that there are some male born individuals (general, not specific) using an ideology to erase women's rights.

That site, whatever its motivations exposes the hypocrisy and deception. That's the overlap for women.

If you don't like the words they use, tell them. Or better still, don't glue yourself to the site. Or, you know, you might be accused of terrorism.

Unless it's just women who will be accused of that, while you remain unaccountability teflon.

Was having a fruity read earlier. Are there really 17 lawsuits brought by the flying lawyer?

Maybe you should read a bit more, and pay a bit more attention. The arguments on that thread are one person arguing with theyself.

That particular thread is full of sock puppets, just like this one is.

Why on earth would two threads about a single person, on two different websites, both be full of sock puppets?

Makes you wonder, doesn’t it? Especially when that person has had multiple real life identities.

There are probably others outside of that particular arena. Then there is the historic stuff ....

@BettyDuKeiraBellisMyShero

Maybe you should read a bit more, and pay a bit more attention. The arguments on that thread are one person arguing with theyself.

That particular thread is full of sock puppets, just like this one is.

Why on earth would two threads about a single person, on two different websites, both be full of sock puppets?

Makes you wonder, doesn’t it? Especially when that person has had multiple real life identities.

Not the thread I read, that was three very prominent GC activists going at each other full throttle.

Maybe. Maybe not. It’s not twitter, you know.

No blue check marks, no verifications, anyone can claim to be anyone over there.

Not sure what constitutes a ‘very prominent GC activist’. Perhaps you can explain on a different thread?

This one is about Stephanie Hayden.

What happened with part 2 of the Mail/Mail on Sunday ruling?

Does anyone know? I seem to have missed that.

@BettyDuKeiraBellisMyShero

Maybe. Maybe not. It’s not twitter, you know.

No blue check marks, no verifications, anyone can claim to be anyone over there.

Not sure what constitutes a ‘very prominent GC activist’. Perhaps you can explain on a different thread?

This one is about Stephanie Hayden.

Yes of course they can but given people were posting details of private messages and were on their under their own names then I suspect they were who they said they were. And by prominent GC activists I mean people who are well known within the GC movement.

Oh, ok. I found it. Article wasn’t defamatory, so Hayden lost.

You've got to laugh at the irony of this. The tellings off have got loads of people going over to have a look, including the scolder-in-chief, and now, over there, they've rolled out a welcome mat.

@nauticant

You've got to laugh at the irony of this. The tellings off have got loads of people going over to have a look, including the scolder-in-chief, and now, over there, they've rolled out a welcome mat.

I wonder how many of them will end up the next lolcows whilst their GC comrades act as apologists for the site.

Yes of course they can but given people were posting details of private messages and were on their under their own names then I suspect they were who they said they were. And by prominent GC activists I mean people who are well known within the GC movement.

Do you have any idea of the rank hypocrisy involved in complaining that women are looking at that site and might be accused of terrorism, not to mention make their nose bleed from all the profanity, homophobia, sexism, a s disablism, while you're utterly glued to it to the point of going cross eyed???

@MoonPomme

I have my own theory about jj and their reason for shitposting this thread to the top of the board for the last couple of days. Sending more traffic to the fruit farm in the process. Its a headscratcher thats for sure. Are we not supposed to be singing wind the bobbin up today, rather than songs by the cure?

Indeed. Handbags at dawn, for sure.

That's what I find truly shocking. Not one person seems to be saying, wait a minute, should we really be supporting this hateful homophobic misogynist crap. Instead it's all whatabouttery and making excuses for some of the most vile shit on the internet. Talk about a hive mind. The rest of the world, from all political spectrums, recognises that site as hateful and hugely damaging to people, yet here it doesn't even seem controversial - if it owns the trans it's justified, even if it takes out a few GC women on the way.

www.pressreader.com/uk/the-mail-on-sunday/20190210/282368335899460

This is the non defamatory article, right?

Did anyone ever explain why it was West Yorkshire police who contacted Graham Linehan? Seeing as neither Hayden nor Linehan live anywhere near West Yorkshire?

@Datun

Yes of course they can but given people were posting details of private messages and were on their under their own names then I suspect they were who they said they were. And by prominent GC activists I mean people who are well known within the GC movement.

Do you have any idea of the rank hypocrisy involved in complaining that women are looking at that site and might be accused of terrorism, not to mention make their nose bleed from all the profanity, homophobia, sexism, a s disablism, while you're utterly glued to it to the point of going cross eyed???

I looked at that site for the first time in my life this morning and read two threads. One was the one I mentioned with GC activists taking chunks out of each other. The other was a more thoughtful poster pointing out that a lot of the people they pick on haven't really done anything wrong and worried someone might end up killing themselves due to the bullying. They were soon put straight with posters pointing out that their had already been two suicides linked to the site and no-one really cared and in fact the site owner sent out a message telling people they shouldn't feel responsible. That and a lot of shitposts about haha let them die.

Unlike it seems several GC activists I am not a member, I wouldnt recommend people go there for any reason and I don't post on there.

You are far too busy here go have time to post anywhere else, JJ.

It’s incredibly disrespectful of you to minimise the suicide of two human beings as caused by a gossip website, rather than pay attention to the words of the people who died.

I’m actually a bit disgusted that you are using people in this manner.

variety.com/2018/gaming/news/chloe-sagal-death-1202858068/