Stephanie Hayden takes Graham Linehan to court for doxxing

[ItsAllGoingToBeFine]

Their statement is here:

twitter.com/flyinglawyer73/status/1046792462067519489?s=19

Once again, no one is denying that a poster made a reference to a thread on KF

I know!
Nobody's denied it. That's not what I said.
FFS lol.
Stop fkn twisting, it's daft - at least try and grasp what I've actually said, or go on pretending you don't know, whichever one it is

@accessorizequeen

Can anyone explain what the latest is with the flying lawyer? A lot of tweets I don’t understand. 🤯

There's a thread on another place about them. I do not recommend you look at it otherwise you might be signing up for Isis by the end of the week.

Just take the L, hun

"Go and have a look at a thread on KF about this person".

Oh my God a poster is telling you to go and look at a thread on KF about this person!

Gaslighters!

Do we have a publicist for Kiwi Farms on this thread?

They're doing a very good job; I bet loads have gone for a look who wouldn't have normally..

So a person that may have caused a great deal of emotional and financial harm to others may, have had a bit of a comeuppance and we're all terrorists for reading about it on a certain site?

@DialSquare

So a person that may have caused a great deal of emotional and financial harm to others may, have had a bit of a comeuppance and we're all terrorists for reading about it on a certain site?

I believe JJ was suggesting that posters on the other site would cause someone to kill a transperson. And it would be all our fault because reasons.

I believe JJ was suggesting that posters on the other site would cause someone to kill a transperson. And it would be all our fault because reasons.

We have the power. Last week us maintaining sex segregation in toilets would decimate the tourist industry. We would, single-handedly, be responsible for depriving the UK of squillions of tourist pounds.

I mean, there are appeals to female socialisation, and then there is just 'put the dog down Damian'.

Makes perfect sense. Everything is our fault.

Well, this particular attempt at DARVO has led to an interesting discussion about free speech, its importance in being able to find out what some very unpleasant TRAs are doing, a stunning post by StandWitch, and no doubt some people saying to themselves "I'm now curious about what behaviour is being referred to, I might have a look".

Like many others here I have zero difficulty in mapping this:

terrorism: The unofficial or unauthorized use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims (from the OED)

onto the activities of many TRAs.

And yet again I'm impressed by how much of the posting by jj1968 is counterproductive to the TRA cause.

Lol, quaagars this is more than usually incoherent from you 😂 I mean, if you seriously want your hill to be defending someone who thinks that mumsnet users are in danger of becoming lone wolf terrorists, then have at it. But I’m going to laugh.

JJs work has backfired so badly that if I had more tinfoil in my house, I’d be tempted to fashion a hat, start joining the dots and conclude it’s some sort of undercover GC op.

More seriously, please, transactivists, have a think about the harm you may be doing to vulnerable trans people by encouraging them to think that vast swathes of women want them dead. Come on. You know that’s not helpful. And you know it’s not true.

Are you trying to trigger an algorithm or something, Quaagars?
I'm honestly struggling to see the point you're trying to make

@Ereshkigalangcleg

Give jj credit, this thread has been well and truly bumped now.

When i saw it i did wonder what had happened!

Well. Now I am wondering if there is new news or if it is just a rehash of old news....

I wish I could find out what was being referenced on the other site but I can't make head nor tail of its thread style. Obvs not a proper terrorist

@Quaagars

A poster on Mumsnet saying 'have you seen the thread on Kiwi Farms' means nothing beyond 'I saw something interesting/alarming about this person on Kiwi Farms'

That's not what happened though, you're twisting it! A poster under the guise of a so called "joke" was encouraging people to go and have a look.
With a "suggest you go and have a look or don't go and have a look" attitude.
Can't find it now, maybe one of the deleted ones?
Why are people making out they didn't (even before the possible deletion?)
This is why people take screenshots isn't it, might have to start doing it myself lol if I could be arsed or cared enough

I saw the post, I don’t get your point though.

Excellent post standwitch

PopperUppleton. Maybe we are so inept at this anarchist stuff we need a special code to decipher....

Genuinely baffled as to why my post was deleted. If a poster’s behavior is disruptive and tedious I’m not sure how noting that could be against guidelines?

I didn’t say the poster himself is those things ‘cos I don’t do ad hom attacks

I believe the monitors are watching this thread closely Bernard.

I assume jj has taken offence to you pointing out jjs biological sex by the use of correct pronouns Bernard. Or someone has taken offence on jjs behalf.

"The monitors"
Or maybe, just maybe, it's regular average every day MN posters who are just getting fed up - not everything has to be a scary eye watch monitor situation?