The Quaker statement said:
Similar events have been run in other parts of the country and have resulted in acrimony and discord. The organisers of the meeting planned to be held in Brighton were made aware that they would need the services of a private security company to maintain public order.
We are extremely uneasy that our decision may result in the suppression of free speech and in particular suppression of natal women's voices.
They went on to say that the meeting didn't showcase both sides of the debate. But would a meeting of TRAs allow gender critical views? Of course not. For that matter, would the meeting of a political party give a platform to someone from the other side? Very unlikely. So why inflict these criteria on WPUK?