From what I remember both Paris Lees and India Willoughby have tried to distance themselves from the more extreme trans-activists/AGP men. India, certainly, received a backlash and then retracted a few days later.
The numbers of trans people swelled massively with the advent of TRAs and inclusion of cross dressing men. Which must have looked like a positive aspect, until, of course, they got completely out of hand and started to make the movement look bad. Hence the subsequent attempt at a distance.
Unfortunately, Paris Lees and Indian Willoughby are certainly not friends to women. The idea that they personally feel as though they should represent women in feminism (or otherwise), is ludicrous. They have a male centric view of the world, which comes as a surprise to nobody.
I have no idea whether they believe their viewpoint is a female one, or whether they know full well there is a lot of projection going on, but either way, they seem determined to have it represented as female. And agreed with. By women.
So an attempt to separate the different types of transwomen, although understandable, and interesting in terms of analysis, in terms of credentials as to who should be regarded as what, it's meaningless. Because although some transwomen are more empathetic and understanding, they're still not women.
And people like India and Paris who want to put themselves in the former, come across as overwhelmingly from the latter.