She's been described as a 'lesbian fantasist' in the headline - not sure that her sexuality is so important that it should be the first word, I'm probably reading too much into it but it seems a bit like an attempt to vilify her (She's a lesbian - the ones who hate men!) when, quite frankly, she has done a damn fine job of vilifying herself - if she has made up all these stories then she is a terrible person, who deserves a prison sentence.
It's interesting (although awful) that she named specific people, as I was under the impression that a lot of false rape accusations (well, a high percentage, there aren't a lot ) aren't levelled against specific people. I suppose that accounts for the length of her sentence, because without supplying names she is only wasting police time - which shouldn't come with that lengthy a sentence.
I'm surprised the first man not only got convicted but got re convicted as it is so hard to get a conviction usually - I imagine racism came into play on that one.
I don't think a false accusation of rape should carry a lengthier sentence than actual rape though. The man she accused was sentenced to 7 years, being sentenced to the same amount of time that all her victims spent in prison, served concurrently, might seem a bit fairer.
It was heartening to see that one of the suggested articles advertised in the middle of the stories was '6 rape myths that need busting' though. This is the type of story that gives antifeminists a lot of grist for their mill, its important to remember that incidents like this are extremely rare and are clearly adequately punished - though I fear that that isn't the message that many people will take from this story. It was good that suggested articles offered a balance.