Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Kate & The Middletons

1000 replies

Tabbytiger122 · 17/09/2026 12:36

I am currently reading Russsll Myers Catherine & William. Enjoying it but one thing that stands out is how the Middletons have never put a foot wrong.
Carole was not from an aristocratic background nor was Michael but they raised their kids not to put a step wrong. Kate also had embarrassing family members (Uncle Gary) but she still invited him to the wedding which was the right thing to do & it nipped the media scandal in the bud & took the wind out of any sails.. Meghan invited none of her extended family or her dad & it caused massive media speculation.
Kate was born for royal life & is a natural. Very proud of our future queen. Her parents did an amazing job.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
fuschiaproudparrot · 22/09/2026 15:26

Definitely not as good as the Hamlets .

Kate & The Middletons
Tabbytiger122 · 22/09/2026 15:34

fuschiaproudparrot · 22/09/2026 15:26

Definitely not as good as the Hamlets .

The Hamlets always tickles me... and the fan club are known as the Hamsters 🐹

OP posts:
Jimsaidpeoplearestrange · 22/09/2026 16:26

Tabbytiger122 · 22/09/2026 15:34

The Hamlets always tickles me... and the fan club are known as the Hamsters 🐹

oh yes. silly names for children is alway so funny!!!!

Tabbytiger122 · 22/09/2026 16:39

Jimsaidpeoplearestrange · 22/09/2026 16:26

oh yes. silly names for children is alway so funny!!!!

Well "Hamlets" has Shakespearean connotations so perhaps Ham approve it's nod to royalty!

OP posts:
Nyata · 22/09/2026 19:29

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Tabbytiger122 · 22/09/2026 21:58

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

They are not living rent free! I am thoroughly enjoying the free entertainment they bring with their complete chaos & dysfunction!
They are the cheap gift that keep on giving!

OP posts:
EvieBB · 22/09/2026 23:14

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

It's not unhealthy or unhinged to call out H&Ms crappy behaviour. What a strange thing to say. Why are you here supposedly wasting time then? Perhaps you should be out volunteering???

EmpressSisi · 22/09/2026 23:25

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

🤣🤣

alanis morrisette GIF
Tabbytiger122 · 22/09/2026 23:50

EvieBB · 22/09/2026 23:14

It's not unhealthy or unhinged to call out H&Ms crappy behaviour. What a strange thing to say. Why are you here supposedly wasting time then? Perhaps you should be out volunteering???

Yep! The same people always detest Hams inaccuracies & lies being called out time & time again!

OP posts:
Calliopespa · 22/09/2026 23:58

Tabbytiger122 · 17/09/2026 18:54

I think Kate is just following the royal protocol of "Never Complain, Never Explain". The Middletons obviously live by this mantra too as their conduct has been exemplary over the past 20 years.
As always nature vs nurture!

I don't agree that none of them have put a foot wrong.

That doesn't mean I don't admire some things about them, nor does it mean I want to enumerate errors of judgment as we all make mistakes. But I think your whole premise for this thread is unsubstantiated.

ETA and actually, for me, all you have succeeded in doing is bringing those shortcomings to mind again. Sweeping claims seldom achieve much.

Backedoffhackedoff · 23/09/2026 08:00

“I don't agree that none of them have put a foot wrong.”

this is true. There was the topless photos/ alledged BJ photos scandal.

more power to her as an individual but putting a foot pretty scandalously wrong

Tabbytiger122 · 23/09/2026 10:18

Backedoffhackedoff · 23/09/2026 08:00

“I don't agree that none of them have put a foot wrong.”

this is true. There was the topless photos/ alledged BJ photos scandal.

more power to her as an individual but putting a foot pretty scandalously wrong

But whatever happens the stiff upper lip remains & she has the strength of character for her role.
I think Catherine is incredibly steely & made of very strong metal. She could have easily come out & gave her side of the Ham shenanigans but she just rose above it proving again how far above them she is.

OP posts:
CurlewKate · 25/09/2026 11:56

Cawvids would be quite funny for the Wales children. That is, if calling children unpleasant nicknames wasn’t deeply objectionable……..

Tabbytiger122 · 25/09/2026 12:02

CurlewKate · 25/09/2026 11:56

Cawvids would be quite funny for the Wales children. That is, if calling children unpleasant nicknames wasn’t deeply objectionable……..

Doesn't have the same Shakespearean vibes or royal connotations as "The Hamlets"!
Try harder!

OP posts:
ThrwhelsOntHEbuzgoroundandrund · 25/09/2026 12:43

I doubt that will catch on.

Purplecatshopaholic · 25/09/2026 13:23

The RF and various hangers-on are all the same to me. Wastes of space, time, money, column inches, CBA with any of them.

BemusedAmerican · 25/09/2026 13:26

lastapache · 21/09/2026 14:35

Yes, he has admitted to drinking, drug taking and depression through his teenage years and early twenties to cope with the loss of his mother, but he appears to have mostly kicked those habits. If he hadn't, it'd be well covered by the press. Looking at the other spares, the less said about Andrew the better, Margaret was an alcoholic her whole life, Bertie had chronic anxiety and social phobia, the Duke of Kent's father was a notorious gambler and drug addict, Victoria's spare when she was growing up turned out to be a despot. In comparison, Harry's doing ok.

As for their return to Britain I don't think it's that deep. They have come back because Harry wants his children to have a British education, and to be British, not American. As far as I am aware, they haven't said they're looking to take up the working royal jobs again (not that they'd be let even if they wanted to). I can't see them thinking that they'll get more work if they're located in the UK, given their unpopularity. So I don't think its financially motivated - they'll take a hit coming back.

The security thing I sympathise with them a bit. Harry didn't ask to be born into the RF. Whether he works for the RF or not, the fact that he requires more security then the average famous person is somewhat an accident of birth. Now, some of it is because of the stupid things he said in his book, and their media shenanigans since they left, and so a portion of his heightened risk is of his own doing. So I'd would say a contribution towards his security would be fair, without actually paying for all of it.

He has no career prospects in the US. He came back to the UK to try to leverage his royal name to get jobs. For money.

In addition, he steps foot in NYC for one day, has his bodyguard shove an innocent New Yorker in the street, and is now apparently accusing an innocent NY tech of sabotaging his clueless speech.

ThrwhelsOntHEbuzgoroundandrund · 25/09/2026 13:29

In addition, he steps foot in NYC for one day, has his bodyguard shove an innocent New Yorker in the street, and is now apparently accusing an innocent NY tech of sabotaging his clueless speech.

Goodness me and golly gosh as some would say.

Looks like he has done well under the tutelage of the marching one.

Tabbytiger122 · 25/09/2026 13:35

BemusedAmerican · 25/09/2026 13:26

He has no career prospects in the US. He came back to the UK to try to leverage his royal name to get jobs. For money.

In addition, he steps foot in NYC for one day, has his bodyguard shove an innocent New Yorker in the street, and is now apparently accusing an innocent NY tech of sabotaging his clueless speech.

This image rehabilitation has been an absolute disaster for them. After the school fiasco last week I don't envy Haz having to face Markle when he arrives home after another yet another f**k up...!
It's absolutely entertaining!

OP posts:
OhMargaret · 25/09/2026 14:24

Tabbytiger122 · 17/09/2026 16:02

I'm not encouraging anyone to criticise anyone. I was merely saying that even though Kate did not grow up aristocratic or royal the royal lifestyle is second nature to her.
Her discretion, her intuition & her consideration is incredible. It would be understandable if she came from an aristocratic background as they close ranks but Kate was outside those circles & is now more royal than the royals themselves.
As I said I am reading Russell Myers book & the Middleton's as a family have been a huge asset to the crown

It’s just manners, this is why people spend hundreds of thousands sending their daughters to not particularly academic boarding schools. Manners are not the same as genuine consideration of others (hence the royal family’s rather opaque approach to their actual financial affairs which do directly affect thousands of others). I’m sure you’ve read enough Austen / Brontë / Wilde etc. to understand that. It’s all about power and managing public perception. Meghan is playing a different game, which is simply to be talked about. I refer you back to Wilde on this point. She’s doing a pretty god job considering her position.

IdaGlossop · 25/09/2026 15:09

Tabbytiger122 · 23/09/2026 10:18

But whatever happens the stiff upper lip remains & she has the strength of character for her role.
I think Catherine is incredibly steely & made of very strong metal. She could have easily come out & gave her side of the Ham shenanigans but she just rose above it proving again how far above them she is.

A bit of a diversion but 'blow job' and 'stiff upper lip' are an 'interesting' combination.

It must be a relief to the family and the courtiers to have a Princess of Wales they can trust completely to do and say the right thing. If the time invested in bringing up George, Charlotte and Louis yields the return of useful citizens and the UK avoids any more Andrews and Harrys, it will have been time well spent. However, I do think the UK public has a right to expect more of a hunger for work from the Waleses. Sophie is more visible than Kate and her causes for the most part more challenging.

CurlewKate · 25/09/2026 15:22

Tabbytiger122 · 25/09/2026 12:02

Doesn't have the same Shakespearean vibes or royal connotations as "The Hamlets"!
Try harder!

There was me thinking that the children were conventionally left out of the unpleasant scrum.

Tabbytiger122 · 25/09/2026 15:26

CurlewKate · 25/09/2026 15:22

There was me thinking that the children were conventionally left out of the unpleasant scrum.

You were the one making up a stupid name for the Wales children not me!

OP posts:
IDasIX · 25/09/2026 15:34

As long as there are people who fervently believe that the PoW is ironing her own frock and spending hours researching a charity before she cuts a ribbon, the monarchy is safe.

I reckon I’ve been in a royal palace more times than she has cleaned her own loo in our respective lifetimes.

wordler · 25/09/2026 15:35

CurlewKate · 25/09/2026 11:56

Cawvids would be quite funny for the Wales children. That is, if calling children unpleasant nicknames wasn’t deeply objectionable……..

I can’t be bothered with doing the HAM hamlets stuff but it’s not nasty a it’s H&M = hAm = HAM and baby hamlets.

So you could do CAWvids I suppose if you feel like it. It doesn’t imply anything nasty.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread