Please or to access all these features

The royal family

GBNews reporting Harry and Megan moving back to the UK

1000 replies

TinyBlueDent · 19/08/2026 22:09

GBNews are reporting that Harry and Megan are moving back to the UK at the end of August.

I won't believe it until I hear it on the BBC.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Washingupdone · 20/08/2026 12:47

ShedShedShed · 19/08/2026 22:27

😂 😂 😂

Didn't he just spend years saying it was too dangerous for his family to live in UK??

But the taxpayer will foot their security 24/7 bill.

AprilMizzel · 20/08/2026 12:49

Washingupdone · 20/08/2026 12:47

But the taxpayer will foot their security 24/7 bill.

I don't think they will - as working RF members do not get that.

But they will get some and that will be paid for by taxpayers not them.

However for security reasons they get offered somewhere to live maybe ?

panomara · 20/08/2026 12:50

I'm getting sucked in now 😉so I wonder if their place in Portugal is anywhere near Eugenie's and Jack's pile in Alentejo? All the kids could play together eh?

ShedShedShed · 20/08/2026 12:52

AoifeRua · 20/08/2026 11:26

I asked what work he does.

The burden shifts to you to show what he does. Because I can't invent a profession out of thin air. You did, and provided unreliable media rags such as The Telegraph, which is infamous for its absolute rubbish, and leans heavily to the right, in perhaps the most toxic manner I have seen in what is barely journalism.

I did show what work he does.

You claimed that it was all lies basically.

So now YOU prove he only cuts ribbons 🤷

Grammarnut · 20/08/2026 12:54

OvaHere · 19/08/2026 23:22

I'm sure this is part of it but they also need to make amends with William if he's about to become the big guy. If Charles has been subsidising them for things like security or housing costs then they have a problem if he's no longer here. Pure speculation because I don't know if that has been the case.

I suspect Charles has funded them from his private fortune. William might not be so generous. Charles is 79 (b.1947) and the Queen has been talking about his cancer diagnosis publicly for the first time. Ominous and if so H&M might want to build bridges with William - not sure he wants the same, but I don't know them.

ERthree · 20/08/2026 12:54

AoifeRua · 20/08/2026 10:56

If there were facts to face (of the ones you provided), I would face them.

And and and and and ! Bloody hell keep your blarney to yourself, you are bloody boring.

Laundrybasketfull · 20/08/2026 12:55

momtoboys · 20/08/2026 12:38

MM isn’t getting enough attention. What attention she gets in the US is negative. She needs to put the spotlight back on her.

Lol, she's in the papers pretty much every day and this thread has 28 pages. I don't think lacks attention

Puzzledandpissedoff · 20/08/2026 12:56

AprilMizzel · 20/08/2026 12:46

There were a lot of factural easily checkable errors in his Spare book and the Opera Interview - the Archbidhop had to come out and correct the marriage one.

Most of us know this, AprilMizzel, but it doesn't stop the silly questions - probably because there was never anything credible to say about the mess H&M have made, and now even "they've got it made in the US" has blown up

And my own favourite lie was "we didn't cooperate withh Scobie on Finding Freedom", only for Harry's "we have to be able to say that we had nothing to do with it" email to be revealed at the Court of Appeal

Small wonder that some of the fans have never forgiven Jason Knauf Grin

BermudaRhombus · 20/08/2026 12:57

AoifeRua · 20/08/2026 12:04

Of course. And it is less prescripted in Wales

This sounds much like what I was taught in an English school. It was a broad mix and certainly much of it was not particularly complimentary towards the UK monarchy or government. I suggest you read a bit more about the curriculum in our education system. As I said, the UK has over a thousand years of history and it’s simply not possible to cover everything in detail.

littlecoffeemug · 20/08/2026 12:58

Being cynical [but usually correct] I believe they have burned through a lot of their money. Not all, but enough to make them realise they won't be able to run with the seriously wealthy Americans. Assuming the seriously wealthy/famous Americans actually wanted them, which they have very clearly demonstrated they don't!

California Dreaming has turned into a bit of a nightmare for them. They're running out of funds, they're not on the Christmas card list of any A Listers, no one cares about what they have to say and the CEO of Netflix has openly derided them as a pair of grifters. The President of the United States has openly called Megan 'a nightmare.' Not great is it?

Though they have gotten exactly what they wished for, you know, total privacy [irrelevancy] and total freedom [no one cares what they do or where they go], fully escaping the hateful racism in the UK and the evil British press. So you'd think they'd be so pleased with that and continue just living quietly in the US?

ShedShedShed · 20/08/2026 12:59

AoifeRua · 20/08/2026 11:55

Actually you are factually incorrect, and those scandals, horrendous as they were, were rife in England.

Feel free to get back in your box if contributing invoked that feeling in you.

You do you.

Noone is saying they didn't happen elsewhere

But they happened in Ireland too... And that's with elected officials. You kept on saying "wah wah wah unelected blah blah blah" as some sort of gotcha or indicator of an elected official being better.

We just pointed out that elected officials and the Church in Ireland over saw the atrocities of forced separation, forced labour and murder if babies. Which you seem to deny they had any responsibility in that a d trying to blame it entirely on the English?

AoifeRua · 20/08/2026 13:02

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 20/08/2026 13:03

I suspect Charles has funded them from his private fortune

I've always suspected the same, @Grammarnut, except that if it's true I wouldn't want to assume it's only Charles's private money involved

Remember he comes from a long line of people adept at tapping the public purse, and that this could be a lot easier to "justify" if Harry was in the UK

NautilusLionfish · 20/08/2026 13:04

KidsDoBetter · 20/08/2026 08:57

The faff when they start …

Dying to know where they will be based & what school.

‘Outside London’ - hmmmm thinking Chingford? Or Croydon??

in Redhill so I think its Croydon. Please God let it me Croydon. They can renovate one of those neglected formerly beautiful buildings in the down centre and call it Archilil Palace

AoifeRua · 20/08/2026 13:04

BermudaRhombus · 20/08/2026 12:57

This sounds much like what I was taught in an English school. It was a broad mix and certainly much of it was not particularly complimentary towards the UK monarchy or government. I suggest you read a bit more about the curriculum in our education system. As I said, the UK has over a thousand years of history and it’s simply not possible to cover everything in detail.

I guess Teachers here need a refresher then in their degrees. As history, by its very nature involves knowledge into key events that occured nationally and globally.

PotolKimchi · 20/08/2026 13:05

If one is being actually cynical, then they need money and being adjacent to the Royals to be relevant again. I won't be surprised if they spend a couple of years here and then do another about turn (and try to sell their story again). That's the only thing that has ever made them money.

Where is Doria in all of this? She can't move permanently to the UK as UK laws on bringing family/grandparents over is quite strict. She won't be eligible for a visa other than a tourist one. So she can be here for six months a year at most and no more. After having been the only grandparent who has been around those kids, I'm sure this will be bitter-sweet for her.

The thing I don't understand is the drama from the previous visit. They were coming, they weren't coming, only he was coming, then she was coming with the kids but she wouldn't appear in public. So much drama. And all from their side with zero provocation. And now suddenly they are moving lock stock and barrel to the same country? Literally doesn't make sense.

AprilMizzel · 20/08/2026 13:06

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cr59yg34r4mo

Security arrangements for The Duke and Duchess of Sussex on their return to the UK are a "private matter," Prime Minister Andy Burnham has said.
He added: "It's a matter for Harry and for Meghan, and we wish them well in the move that they are making."
It comes after it emerged that the couple intend to relocate with their children from the US to the UK later this month to a private, non-royal residence outside London.

Maybe security is still all on them?

Also stated they are no current plans for them to go back to being working royals.
.

Prince Harry and Meghan sat next to each other and smiling in Colombia in 2024

Prince Harry and Meghan's UK security a private matter, Burnham says

Andy Burnham wishes the Duke and Duchess of Sussex well in "the move that they are making".

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cr59yg34r4mo

Whosthetabbynow · 20/08/2026 13:08

Their humiliation must be complete. I await the inevitable divorce.

HolidayHideaway · 20/08/2026 13:08

littlecoffeemug · 20/08/2026 12:58

Being cynical [but usually correct] I believe they have burned through a lot of their money. Not all, but enough to make them realise they won't be able to run with the seriously wealthy Americans. Assuming the seriously wealthy/famous Americans actually wanted them, which they have very clearly demonstrated they don't!

California Dreaming has turned into a bit of a nightmare for them. They're running out of funds, they're not on the Christmas card list of any A Listers, no one cares about what they have to say and the CEO of Netflix has openly derided them as a pair of grifters. The President of the United States has openly called Megan 'a nightmare.' Not great is it?

Though they have gotten exactly what they wished for, you know, total privacy [irrelevancy] and total freedom [no one cares what they do or where they go], fully escaping the hateful racism in the UK and the evil British press. So you'd think they'd be so pleased with that and continue just living quietly in the US?

I agree but I wonder if there’s an additional bombshell to come?

If M I’d see this as an opportunity for a glamorous ‘three way’ kind of life. Cash in on business ops in UK that being royal adjacent brings. Get boarding established at best schools. Pop off to Portugal when UK based for odd month & then back to Montecito with cash for perma sunshine & R & R.

Washingupdone · 20/08/2026 13:09

AprilMizzel · 20/08/2026 12:49

I don't think they will - as working RF members do not get that.

But they will get some and that will be paid for by taxpayers not them.

However for security reasons they get offered somewhere to live maybe ?

Why should they, such a wealthy couple net worth £40/60 million have help from UK workers who start paying taxes on earnings of a meager £12,570 per year?

jeffgoldblum · 20/08/2026 13:10

Puzzledandpissedoff · 20/08/2026 11:56

I think what you’re putting out is influencing what you’re getting back

IME this can often happen, @EasternStandard, and when a visceral loathing of Britishness such as the PP's is involved we might even say it's bound to.
Nor do the many falsehoods help, such as non-existent "chimp as a bride" images and claims that Irish history isn't taught in schools (for which I suppose we should read "they don't say what I want them to")

The parallels with H&M's behaviour are obvious, in that they've made their hatred of the UK and its institutions very clear and lied again and again ... and yet now it's being said they're coming back?

Make it make sense, somebody Confused

I’d advise you and any other longtime posters to follow my precautions and stay well away from these threads.
its the Catherine threads all over again.

RigsbysCat · 20/08/2026 13:10

autumnleavesonthefloor · 19/08/2026 22:17

They are.

Far more popular than workshy will and Kate.

Well you're a charmer aren't you? Kate has had cancer as a still young mum with 3 kids ffs. How dare she have eased off her public duties 🙄

RigsbysCat · 20/08/2026 13:12

Mylovelygreendress · 19/08/2026 22:22

We have heard and read their own words . We know exactly what they are like .
They will not be working Royals .

They will not be working full stop.

PotolKimchi · 20/08/2026 13:12

I wouldn't be surprised if the last minute random decision/announcement was an attempt to force KC's hand on security/funding/bringing them back to the fold. It failed when they left (this dramatic announcement), it failed when they came back last month (BP said no, they met the King under his conditions and the constant back and forth was just foolish), and I wonder if a second set of drama will now erupt.

The govt will say no security as non working Royals. Suddenly this will come as a shock to them. They will say they won't move. Then they will beg King Charles to intervene. Sussex Squad will paint him as the bad man refusing to protect his grandkids who are only moving here to be closer to him. Then as September nears the drama will keep spiralling. Will they have guards in school, what about the other parents. There will be threats not to move here. We won't hear a peep from William and Kate who will suddenly be busy on a long list of last minute appointments. And then they will still come as planned but with some additional drama.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 20/08/2026 13:13

jeffgoldblum · 20/08/2026 13:10

I’d advise you and any other longtime posters to follow my precautions and stay well away from these threads.
its the Catherine threads all over again.

You're not wrong, jeff, but don't worry - I've no intention of engaging directly with the more obvious derailers Smile

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.