Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Eugenie’s baby (no.3)

153 replies

EmpressSisi · 04/08/2026 18:24

Eugenie gave birth to a daughter on Monday. She was born in Lisbon, Portugal.

The baby’s name has not been revealed yet.

If anyone cares.

Eugenie’s baby (no.3)
OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
WouldRatherBeOnaBeach · 04/08/2026 23:58

EmpressSisi · 04/08/2026 21:39

I just thought if they’re going for middle names of Prince Albert and George V, they might not go so obvious for the girl either. Maybe Alexandrina? And there have been a few Georgian queens and princesses with the name Amelia (first and middle).

It’s so much fun guessing 😊

Amelia is a congenital birth defect!

Awful name!

Needmorelego · 05/08/2026 00:05

WouldRatherBeOnaBeach · 04/08/2026 23:55

Yet they live free in royal cottages when they fancy being in the UK!

Who pays for those then? The fairies?? 🙄

I assume they are owned by the royal family. I actually don't know.
They might be not paying rent but presumably they have to pay the bills etc.
"Our" taxes aren't going to be paying for the gas, electric and council tax bills.

Needmorelego · 05/08/2026 00:08

WouldRatherBeOnaBeach · 04/08/2026 23:58

Amelia is a congenital birth defect!

Awful name!

Yet it's been one of the top ten most popular girls names in the UK for donkeys years 🤷

MarchionessVonSausage · 05/08/2026 01:14

Whynottryagain · 04/08/2026 22:39

Maybe this baby will be Frederica then?!

Ooh I like Frederica!

Not sure about a Portuguese influenced name. If my husband had a job in say, Thailand and I lived there part time, I wouldn't give my child a Thai name. It'd be weird.

BemusedAmerican · 05/08/2026 01:34

How about Frederica Alexandra? Or Isabella Maria (the Portuguese equivalent of Elizabeth Mary).

Downunderduchess · 05/08/2026 01:36

The photo that was published announcing the birth on the Royal Family instagram account credited Jack Brooksbank for the photo. It was definitely a man’s hand, quite hairy.

ContractorQuestion · 05/08/2026 02:00

I think she will be named Victoria or Helena (Eugenie’s middle names), with Elizabeth Nicola as second/third names.
Beatrice used Elizabeth for both of her daughters middle names so I think that’s a certain for this one too. Nicola is Jack’s mother.

Mingou · 05/08/2026 02:29

DaisyDooley · 04/08/2026 20:03

I would put an odds on bet on Victoria being in the name -but I’m going to go for Cecile. Daughter in law of Ernest of Hesse, who was the son of Princess Alice of Great Britain (Queen Victoria daughter).
Cecile was Prince Philip’s favourite sister.
So I’m going for Cecile Victoria Margaret.

Cecilie, and given she was a Nazi who died in a fiery plane crash, I doubt it very much.

TroysMammy · 05/08/2026 09:03

Maud
Constance
Alice

Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · 05/08/2026 09:08

MarchionessVonSausage · 05/08/2026 01:14

Ooh I like Frederica!

Not sure about a Portuguese influenced name. If my husband had a job in say, Thailand and I lived there part time, I wouldn't give my child a Thai name. It'd be weird.

Yes the baby isn't Portuguese!
Also agree re the houses they live in. The live in Crown Estates properties, so properties owned by us, for free. They are not working Royals. Why do they need 'an office' in a Royal palace? Beatrice is carrying on the work of her shady parents, so who knows who is paying their bills?

Serenster · 05/08/2026 10:03

corblimeymlud · 04/08/2026 18:26

Now that's a cute little suit 😊

It’s from the brand of her distant relative - Marie Chantal of Greece. A gift from the Greek royals perhaps?

Victoria also had a daughter Helena which I will go for as my pick. I agree Elizabeth is likely to be a middle name - Eugenie was very respectful to her grandmother when she was alive.

Ukisgaslit · 05/08/2026 11:09

IcedPurple · 04/08/2026 19:44

That's your first reaction to the birth of a healthy baby?

Anyway your taxes won't be supporting this child, so you needn't worry yourself overmuch.

That is not the question to ask.
The real question is - why this particular baby ? Why is this particular baby offered up for public consumption?

Posters here do not fawn over every baby a celebrity has so why this one ?

Because it’s more attempts at encouraging the parasocial relationship with the Windsors Yes the same Windsors who have covered up for Andrew for decades .

What did you know William and Charles and when ?
And the poster above was right . We are paying for them. We pay for Charles - we pay for all of them . All they have they took from us .

Twonewcats · 05/08/2026 11:12

Ukisgaslit · 05/08/2026 11:09

That is not the question to ask.
The real question is - why this particular baby ? Why is this particular baby offered up for public consumption?

Posters here do not fawn over every baby a celebrity has so why this one ?

Because it’s more attempts at encouraging the parasocial relationship with the Windsors Yes the same Windsors who have covered up for Andrew for decades .

What did you know William and Charles and when ?
And the poster above was right . We are paying for them. We pay for Charles - we pay for all of them . All they have they took from us .

Has there been another baby since KC3 took the throne?
All royal baby announcements are posted on the RF social media. I can't imagine KC3 wants his brother back in the fold.

mondaytosunday · 05/08/2026 11:18

It’s wonderful news for any family.

Ukisgaslit · 05/08/2026 11:19

Way to miss the point both posters above

Why is this baby being offered up for public consumption? It’s PR

To those who say celebrate all life- fine - but show me the other babies you are posting about .

Ukisgaslit · 05/08/2026 11:20

@Twonewcats

Imagine all you like - the facts are Charles and the rest of them covered up for Andrew and are still funding and protecting him .

Twonewcats · 05/08/2026 11:29

Ukisgaslit · 05/08/2026 11:19

Way to miss the point both posters above

Why is this baby being offered up for public consumption? It’s PR

To those who say celebrate all life- fine - but show me the other babies you are posting about .

All royal babies are offered up in this way. You're totally right that I don't get what point you're making

Ukisgaslit · 05/08/2026 11:43

Twonewcats · 05/08/2026 11:29

All royal babies are offered up in this way. You're totally right that I don't get what point you're making

I’ll spell it out .

All ‘royal’ babies are put up for public consumption in this way, yes . Why is that ? It wasn’t always the case .
Its PR . It attempts to build the faux intimacy / parasocial social relationship that their dwindling support now relies on .

I meant to reply to @cathyorclaire - she pointed out the whole ‘HRH’ nonsense included in the announcement while their father’s long term link to a prolific pedophile and other corruption allegations are being investigated!

Have the Windsors apologised or withdrawn their statement calling Virgina a liar ?
No? Business as usual I take it .
Now can any other Windsors produce a baby asap ? The machine is hungry .

Mingou · 05/08/2026 11:45

But it was always the case. Royal babies have been news literally for ever.

Ukisgaslit · 05/08/2026 11:46

They haven’t .
PR such as this wasn’t needed in the past .

Mingou · 05/08/2026 11:49

Lol. Sure.

deeahgwitch · 05/08/2026 11:58

Speaking of Royal babies I’d love a tv series, similar to Downton Abbey, on the children of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert. They intermarried with many Royal families in Europe.
i think it would be interesting.
Lovely locations and costumes too.
Their grandchildrens lives too, if their lives were interesting, could be incorporated into the series.

Twonewcats · 05/08/2026 12:03

Ukisgaslit · 05/08/2026 11:46

They haven’t .
PR such as this wasn’t needed in the past .

They have in the past generation, ie at a similar pace to all social media type stuff.

ImpossibleThursday · 05/08/2026 12:12

Given that both her sons have the "st" sound at the end of their names, I'm going for Celeste or Esther or Estelle. Probably Elizabeth as a middle name.

Serenster · 05/08/2026 12:37

Ukisgaslit · 05/08/2026 11:46

They haven’t .
PR such as this wasn’t needed in the past .

Helpfully, there’s an academic deep dive into this very subject that disproves your assertion. It goes through how Queen Victoria’s pregnancy with and subsequent birth of her oldest daughter Vicky was subject to massive press coverage. You can read the abstract at the link below.

That was 186 years ago now, showing just how long royal babies have been big news.

https://academic.oup.com/jvc/article-abstract/27/3/424/6574465?redirectedFrom=fulltext