Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

PR disasters - thread 19

1000 replies

Mylovelygreendress · 29/06/2026 08:44

Can’t see a new thread and am pretty sure there is still lots to discuss !

OP posts:
Thread gallery
43
Wibz · 02/07/2026 14:29

bluegreygreen · 02/07/2026 14:01

Meanwhile, in all of Harry's Hype™️ we don't hear anything from him actually about the charity of which he is patron.

Two weeks ago, Invictus Germany held its second sports festival since Dusseldörf 2023.
This time 12 nations took part.
Invictus Germany Sports Festival 2026

Harry, as patron, gave an online welcoming speech. Someone from Boeing attended.
Some interesting comments from the Invictus CEO:
"The Invictus Germany Sports Festival is a wonderful example of the broader Invictus Movement in action keeping the spirit of the Games alive between Games cycles and creating further opportunities for wounded, injured, and sick service personnel and veterans to continue their journeys of recovery through sport and community. At the Invictus Games Foundation, we look forward to expanding on this model in the future to unlock greater impact across new regions ..."

That’s interesting because the Twitter post shared by the SS member about their invitation to Chatham House on Tuesday - specified it was an Invictus Games Foundation Event … maybe decentralisation is afoot?

Thedom · 02/07/2026 14:30

jeffgoldblum · 02/07/2026 13:26

Some clever people on Reddit have apparently discovered the three experts who drew up harry security report!

That’s the company their bodyguard Chris Sanchez owns / works with.

Such an unbiased independent report.

MyDogClive · 02/07/2026 14:31

A thought has just struck me about how it’s not unusual for people with addictions to come up with creative excuses to avoid events that will prevent their indulgence.

Starryfifty · 02/07/2026 14:33

MyDogClive · 02/07/2026 14:31

A thought has just struck me about how it’s not unusual for people with addictions to come up with creative excuses to avoid events that will prevent their indulgence.

Won't stop him indulging unfortunately. Those poor kids

PotolKimchi · 02/07/2026 14:41

The bit that doesn't make sense is this. Let's say I was coming to an event and my private security team said look it's too dangerous, then the natural answer to that would be to think: a) how essential is my physical presence at this thing? (Minimal) b) would the threat dissipate if I stayed at home and did a little speech by video? (Possibly)
So then the safest thing for the participants and attendees would be for Harry to stay away.
It's not even the actual Invictus Games- it's a 'one year to go event.'

The entire psychodrama is reminding me of these two fabulous shows; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty_Twelve and this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W1A_(TV_series)

W1A (TV series) - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W1A_(TV_series)

Puzzledandpissedoff · 02/07/2026 14:46

From the linked article:

"The reporters should be forgiven. As royal correspondents, they are used to receiving briefing notes that help them cover events. The palace notes are usually factual, so the journalists might have expected Harry and Meghan’s messages to be equally trustworthy"

Sorry, but if the whole thing's true, more fool them. It seems obvious to anyone with a brain that H&M's stories change like the wind according to what suits, so I'm not sure how this could have escaped reporters, royal rota or not

More likely IMO to be just a way of stretching the story further for more clickbait

IcedPurple · 02/07/2026 14:48

PotolKimchi · 02/07/2026 14:41

The bit that doesn't make sense is this. Let's say I was coming to an event and my private security team said look it's too dangerous, then the natural answer to that would be to think: a) how essential is my physical presence at this thing? (Minimal) b) would the threat dissipate if I stayed at home and did a little speech by video? (Possibly)
So then the safest thing for the participants and attendees would be for Harry to stay away.
It's not even the actual Invictus Games- it's a 'one year to go event.'

The entire psychodrama is reminding me of these two fabulous shows; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty_Twelve and this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W1A_(TV_series)

Well, exactly!

If he trusts his own private security firm more than RAVEC, and if they have told him he is genuinely at risk at an IG event, then the obvious step is for him to reconsider or cancel the entire 'event'.

Also, most people would be very relieved to hear that an expert security assessment has shown that the risk to him and his family has not increased, so therefore there's no need for extra security. But Harry takes it as a personal insult. He really is terribly mixed up and in need of intervention.

Starryfifty · 02/07/2026 14:49

PotolKimchi · 02/07/2026 14:41

The bit that doesn't make sense is this. Let's say I was coming to an event and my private security team said look it's too dangerous, then the natural answer to that would be to think: a) how essential is my physical presence at this thing? (Minimal) b) would the threat dissipate if I stayed at home and did a little speech by video? (Possibly)
So then the safest thing for the participants and attendees would be for Harry to stay away.
It's not even the actual Invictus Games- it's a 'one year to go event.'

The entire psychodrama is reminding me of these two fabulous shows; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty_Twelve and this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W1A_(TV_series)

It's all nonsensical. They very obviously planned full bells and whistles tour. Paps with KC and probably his kids papped with his cousins. All refused but he kept persisting . It's reported that he bombarded PW with calls for a long time. He probably realised last weekend that it wasn't looking good for him now we have this circus. I actually don't think he'll even turn up now

Aprilfountain · 02/07/2026 14:51

Thedom · 02/07/2026 14:30

That’s the company their bodyguard Chris Sanchez owns / works with.

Such an unbiased independent report.

Ohhh that does make sense, the recognisable bodyguard who is always front and centre of their protection, not surprised he's involved in some way imho.

Mylovelygreendress · 02/07/2026 14:52

Starryfifty · 02/07/2026 14:28

This is probably the most damaging thing he has ever done. Hopefully some friends will now intervene and get him some help. Unless he's perfectly mentally sound and he's just a knob

Which friends ? He seems to have alienated his long standing friends as well as his family .

OP posts:
Thedom · 02/07/2026 14:57

Aprilfountain · 02/07/2026 14:51

Ohhh that does make sense, the recognisable bodyguard who is always front and centre of their protection, not surprised he's involved in some way imho.

It’s not the short bald guy, the one who is as recognizable as Harry is 😀.

It’s this guy …. He is often with them at public events

www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/prince-harry-meghan-markle-hire-26733730

Starryfifty · 02/07/2026 15:01

Mylovelygreendress · 02/07/2026 14:52

Which friends ? He seems to have alienated his long standing friends as well as his family .

Very true. Well then he's screwed. His wife will certainly not help him

Aprilfountain · 02/07/2026 15:02

Oh right, that's actually the man I was referring to, maybe I got the name wrong lol.

cheezncrackers · 02/07/2026 15:10

This just about sums up the 'will he, won't he' debacle of this week. From Tom Sykes of The Daily Beast:

‘It is now blatantly apparent what this whole exercise was about. The tour, the announcement that Meghan and the kids were coming, the whole carefully choreographed media rollout, the months of assurances to the Royal Household that this was happening, the accommodation requests, the detailed planning: it was all just to bounce his poor, weak, loving father into intervening in the Government’s security decision-making, something Charles, to his eternal credit, has refused to do. This is the high-water mark of Harry’s emotional blackmail.’

Justdancevance · 02/07/2026 15:12

Who are the authors of the report. Will they claim copyright if a newspaper such as the daily Mail tries to publish their woolly, wildly speculative hypotheses.

Thedom · 02/07/2026 15:20

Yeah, I’m wondering why the DM have not mentioned it, obviously it was only sent to the WhatsApp group of preferred journalists to read and publish the details.

AnAutumnCrow · 02/07/2026 15:23

‘The unconditional worship of Meghan Markle is totally baffling.’

@Ohpleeeease, I’m still very struck by what you said this morning.

I suppose we should presume that the unconditional worship serves an essential psychological purpose for a very mentally disturbed man. Like she’s (for him) the reincarnation of you-know-who.

Anyway, he’s now at least visibly in the ballpark of being a danger to himself and others, so maybe someone will finally DO something. People who’ve pandered to him for political and personal gain like Yvette Cooper and Chris Ship should be bloody ashamed and held to account now.

BasiliskStare · 02/07/2026 15:28

I do think what would be a law of unintended consequences is if BCC or various veteran organisations just said "Thanks H for highlighting the danger to other ex members of the armed services. We now regretfully decline your invitation to the 1 year to go event and will be cancelling the whole thing. Thanks for the heads up"

It seems pretty shitty to me if he is drawing in other pilots ( and therefore because of the nature of the event other veterans ) to bolster up his wants for his security. That's aside from any other questions about the IG. Or as a pp eloquently posted the worries of people who live in Birmingham.

IcedPurple · 02/07/2026 15:28

Thedom · 02/07/2026 15:20

Yeah, I’m wondering why the DM have not mentioned it, obviously it was only sent to the WhatsApp group of preferred journalists to read and publish the details.

Why bother with Prince Harry when you can have King Harry?

PR disasters  - thread 19
BasiliskStare · 02/07/2026 15:31

@IcedPurple Quite - and if I may be frivolous for a moment , at the least the footballing Harry keeps his beard nicely trimmed.

IcedPurple · 02/07/2026 15:37

BasiliskStare · 02/07/2026 15:31

@IcedPurple Quite - and if I may be frivolous for a moment , at the least the footballing Harry keeps his beard nicely trimmed.

There's also the fact that he's extremely talented, has a supportive wife he's known since childhood and is not a whiny, attention seeking man child. So pretty much the opposite of that other Harry!

DryTerryandJUNE · 02/07/2026 15:47

Starryfifty · 02/07/2026 14:28

This is probably the most damaging thing he has ever done. Hopefully some friends will now intervene and get him some help. Unless he's perfectly mentally sound and he's just a knob

Does he still have friends? Real ones, I mean.

AtIusvue · 02/07/2026 15:47

Some saying online- that he already knows the result and this is why Harry is spiralling and that he will be a no show next week- blaming the security issue.

But is that how it works? Will he have the judgement already and Tuesday is just a public reading?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.