Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Harry and Meghan offered royal accommodation

1000 replies

SparklingXmas · 20/06/2026 08:47

Will they stay at Royal Lodge? I really hope it all works out for KC and to see his grandchildren would be lovely.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yzlmkl7zzo

Harry is wearing a baby blue linen shirt and a black 'Invictus Australia' baseball cap. Meghan is wearing a darker blue and white striped shirt.

Harry and Meghan offered royal accommodation during UK visit

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are set to visit the UK with their children next month, for the first time since 2022.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yzlmkl7zzo

OP posts:
Thread gallery
25
PoppysAunt · 29/06/2026 18:20

jeffgoldblum · 29/06/2026 18:20

A pop group? 😁

Lead singer Marc Jolan!

jeffgoldblum · 29/06/2026 18:22

Rhaidimiddim · 29/06/2026 18:06

So have the sugars joined us?

Couldn’t possibly comment @Rhaidimiddim.

Rhaidimiddim · 29/06/2026 18:28

PoppysAunt · 29/06/2026 18:13

No. It only filters out because Harry tells people. He shouldn't do that, but then again he's an idiot.
He's getting as much security as other members of the RF, who are actually working.
Anne, Edward, Sophie etc get no security at all unless they are working. Edward travels by tube, Sophie by bike, Anne and her husband go to restaurants in London and Gloucestershire. They have all had serious threats against them. Anne was once the victim of a kidnapping attempt at gunpoint.
Harry, whenever in the UK, gets appropriate taxpayer funded security, even though he's binned off the UK.
The problem is that he shares too much because he can't stop taking about himself and the man is a risk.
Knocking on random doors in London?

Telling the world he is currently on holiday in Europe. He didn't need to do that. RAVEC and BP didn't iet that one out.

Also, wherever he is atm I bet he isn't getting highest-level, taxpayer-funded security for him and the kids, and he's not bleating about "risk follows the person, not the place" in that situation. Quite happy to transport his family without government shotgun outriders from the airport in e.g. Portugal to a private (and privately protected) residence.

But not in London. Uniquely so, it would seem. The only place where he has standing to mount a challenge that might lead to IPP. And also the only issue he has left that he can use to bully his dad.

StormGazing · 29/06/2026 18:33

So this morning Hazmat and Megain were victims, yet again, where their security isn’t going to be made available by RAVEC (aka the taxpayers coffers, providing appropriate bells and whistles for their galactic sized egos). Apparently, according to headlines on X Hazza is
goong to do whatever possible to bring the little darlings for a day even (if he can scrabble enough cash off whomever will give it to them…. Hopefully all of the press that the story seems to be filtering this through may reach enough gullible people) … so the victim is now setting himself up as the superhero who managed to get his little darlings in a room with KC 🙄🙄🙄 not enough eye roll emojis

PoppysAunt · 29/06/2026 18:33

Rhaidimiddim · 29/06/2026 18:28

Telling the world he is currently on holiday in Europe. He didn't need to do that. RAVEC and BP didn't iet that one out.

Also, wherever he is atm I bet he isn't getting highest-level, taxpayer-funded security for him and the kids, and he's not bleating about "risk follows the person, not the place" in that situation. Quite happy to transport his family without government shotgun outriders from the airport in e.g. Portugal to a private (and privately protected) residence.

But not in London. Uniquely so, it would seem. The only place where he has standing to mount a challenge that might lead to IPP. And also the only issue he has left that he can use to bully his dad.

I can't decide if he really is that stupid?
Doesn't he understand that no-one else in the RF shares all that personal shit?
It's risking his children
I suppose the fans lap it up, as we've seen. That's what counts.

IdaGlossop · 29/06/2026 18:35

These two bring out the very worst in each other. I imagine them sitting at the table in their Montecito retro kitchen egging each other on: 'Yes and...'; 'And what about.....'.

This could have been managed very calmly: decide the dates, team (if there is one) liaise with charities, confirm programme, agree offer of accommodation from Royal family and Spencers, no advance press info except dates, brief press with minimal details 48 hours before event, arrive with own security team and PRs on scheduled flight from an airport not LAX, flying first class into Heathrow, dress Meghan in Invictus polo shirt, bind her arms closely to her sides with Invictus-branded rope and tape her mouth up with transparent gaffer tape for Invictus event, drive Megan back to BP in car with blacked-out windows, Henry attends remaining events, Henry collects Megan and children from BP, drive to Uncle Charlie's gaff for ritual prostration on mother's grave, drive back to Heathrow.

Not difficult at all.

Vivienesarches689 · 29/06/2026 18:40

noonames · 29/06/2026 18:20

From a news report: Ravec had concluded that because Prince Harry was going to be an infrequent visitor to the UK, his security needs would be assessed on a case by case basis.

This is why he is supposed to give notice, so they can assess the risk and sort appropriate protection.

I believe his request to the Home Office was in the hope that instead of this bespoke case by case arrangement, they might decide that he should get automatic protection at all times, regardless of the level of risk. Currently the only people with that level of security are the King and Queen, and the Waleses. This is because of their constitutional importance.

However - if the case by case threat assessment for a particular visit determined that Harry needed 24/7 armed security, he would still get it now. The risk is assessed each time he comes and appropriate protection provided. If on the other hand he is judged to need the same arrangement as the King, he wouldn’t have to give notice and the risk wouldn’t be assessed each time, it would be automatic. So he could turn up at a moment’s notice and have 24/7 full armed security which wasn’t actually necessary. That’s what he wants.

Thanks noonames

I appreciate this informed post and explanation.

PoppysAunt · 29/06/2026 18:43

All this detailed and correct information and we didn't need to go on YouTube.

Princessfluffy · 29/06/2026 18:49

I’m against any tax payer funded security for these two. The UK has much bigger financial problems to address. They can easily pay for their own security like other wealthy people do. They clearly don’t actually care much about security anyway judging by the fact that they are happy to travel to Nigeria, Colombia, Ukraine and the rest of the world it’s just the UK that they are frightened in apparently.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 29/06/2026 18:56

PoppysAunt · 29/06/2026 17:00

Who is William's "Crisis Manager", pray?
Plus some of us can work out stuff for ourselves, ta.
It's utterly ludicrous to suggest that the RF would support the obsessive, peevish selfishness of Harry and fan the flames of his paranoia, just to distract from a man who has already lost his titles and is completely marginalised.
That is one of the more wild claims on here.
Utter nonsense
PS didn't read past paragraph 3.
It just seemed to get more fanciful.

Edited

I didn’t even get to paragraph 3! 😂

PoppysAunt · 29/06/2026 18:58

BigWillyLittleTodger · 29/06/2026 18:56

I didn’t even get to paragraph 3! 😂

😂😂😂
Anyway, with a bit of luck, it's all been explained now. So Harry's lies can hopefully be put to one side, and the truth prevail.

Rhaidimiddim · 29/06/2026 19:05

PoppysAunt · 29/06/2026 18:33

I can't decide if he really is that stupid?
Doesn't he understand that no-one else in the RF shares all that personal shit?
It's risking his children
I suppose the fans lap it up, as we've seen. That's what counts.

I know from bitter personal experience that even kids are just props when narc rage kicks in. Right now this narc is using his kids to try to get what he wants, and it won't even register with him that this is not fair to them or that it might cost them something.

BigWillyLittleTodger · 29/06/2026 19:07

IAmATorturedPoet · 29/06/2026 18:08

Good question @Mylovelygreendress

Harry: I’m very worried about my security, I don’t feel safe in U.K.

Harry: Here is my U.K. itinerary

🙄

That really made me laugh! He’s such a dope! 😂

PoppysAunt · 29/06/2026 19:07

BigWillyLittleTodger · 29/06/2026 19:07

That really made me laugh! He’s such a dope! 😂

Classic Harry!

Vivienesarches689 · 29/06/2026 19:08

Rhaidimiddim · 29/06/2026 18:28

Telling the world he is currently on holiday in Europe. He didn't need to do that. RAVEC and BP didn't iet that one out.

Also, wherever he is atm I bet he isn't getting highest-level, taxpayer-funded security for him and the kids, and he's not bleating about "risk follows the person, not the place" in that situation. Quite happy to transport his family without government shotgun outriders from the airport in e.g. Portugal to a private (and privately protected) residence.

But not in London. Uniquely so, it would seem. The only place where he has standing to mount a challenge that might lead to IPP. And also the only issue he has left that he can use to bully his dad.

Well I don’t think it’s unreasonable to suggest that he is more at risk in London than he is in Portugal tbh!

Pluschanges · 29/06/2026 19:08

Princessfluffy · 29/06/2026 18:49

I’m against any tax payer funded security for these two. The UK has much bigger financial problems to address. They can easily pay for their own security like other wealthy people do. They clearly don’t actually care much about security anyway judging by the fact that they are happy to travel to Nigeria, Colombia, Ukraine and the rest of the world it’s just the UK that they are frightened in apparently.

How convenient for Meghan.

PoppysAunt · 29/06/2026 19:10

Rhaidimiddim · 29/06/2026 19:05

I know from bitter personal experience that even kids are just props when narc rage kicks in. Right now this narc is using his kids to try to get what he wants, and it won't even register with him that this is not fair to them or that it might cost them something.

Really? I don't know anything about that personality disorder but I don't think those children are protected enough. The word "props" is probably an accurate one.

abigailll · 29/06/2026 19:13

IAmATorturedPoet · 29/06/2026 17:59

I think that was Mike Nolan or could have been Mike Dolan 😂

I think you’ll find it’s Mickey Dolenz

Vivienesarches689 · 29/06/2026 19:13

PoppysAunt · 29/06/2026 18:33

I can't decide if he really is that stupid?
Doesn't he understand that no-one else in the RF shares all that personal shit?
It's risking his children
I suppose the fans lap it up, as we've seen. That's what counts.

No surprise but I I’m not sure that I agree with this entirely.

Once you are outside the bubble of protection that the institution of the monarchy affords, and their influence and power, with their level of PR resources, and the ability to negotiate with the press to a degree and suppress some stories in favour of others, I think it genuinely becomes a lot harder to conceal your location and future travel plans.

Also, in response to other posts, I take the point that Katherine, Anne and Sophie and Camilla, have all received negative press and threats to their safety in their time, but speaking very generally, they all seem to be quite popular atm and inspire lots of positive publicity that generally outweighs the bad, whereas looking at it objectively, the general attitude towards MM seems to be universally negative and the rhetoric against her and Harry is full of vitriol, so I would have said that the threat at this moment in time is higher for H&M atm but of course that will probably diminish in future.

And from a PR and security issue, it would be better if the feud between the two sides could be resolved so that all of the hysteria in the press can die down and it becomes a non-story.

PoppysAunt · 29/06/2026 19:17

Vivienesarches689 · 29/06/2026 19:13

No surprise but I I’m not sure that I agree with this entirely.

Once you are outside the bubble of protection that the institution of the monarchy affords, and their influence and power, with their level of PR resources, and the ability to negotiate with the press to a degree and suppress some stories in favour of others, I think it genuinely becomes a lot harder to conceal your location and future travel plans.

Also, in response to other posts, I take the point that Katherine, Anne and Sophie and Camilla, have all received negative press and threats to their safety in their time, but speaking very generally, they all seem to be quite popular atm and inspire lots of positive publicity that generally outweighs the bad, whereas looking at it objectively, the general attitude towards MM seems to be universally negative and the rhetoric against her and Harry is full of vitriol, so I would have said that the threat at this moment in time is higher for H&M atm but of course that will probably diminish in future.

And from a PR and security issue, it would be better if the feud between the two sides could be resolved so that all of the hysteria in the press can die down and it becomes a non-story.

There is no feud.
Harry gets appropriate taxpayer funded security. It is reviewed and assessed.
There have been serious threats against various members of the family, even the popular ones.
The difference is that they don't constantly go on about it, exaggerate and complain from a position of ignorance about the workings of RAVEC.
That is Harry alone.

PoppysAunt · 29/06/2026 19:18

abigailll · 29/06/2026 19:13

I think you’ll find it’s Mickey Dolenz

Wasn't he in the Monkees?

BigWillyLittleTodger · 29/06/2026 19:19

abigailll · 29/06/2026 19:13

I think you’ll find it’s Mickey Dolenz

I thought it was Mickey Rooney?

jeffgoldblum · 29/06/2026 19:19

.

snl season 43 GIF by Saturday Night Live
PoppysAunt · 29/06/2026 19:20

BigWillyLittleTodger · 29/06/2026 19:19

I thought it was Mickey Rooney?

No. He was married to Elizabeth Taylor.

IcedPurple · 29/06/2026 19:21

Vivienesarches689 · 29/06/2026 19:13

No surprise but I I’m not sure that I agree with this entirely.

Once you are outside the bubble of protection that the institution of the monarchy affords, and their influence and power, with their level of PR resources, and the ability to negotiate with the press to a degree and suppress some stories in favour of others, I think it genuinely becomes a lot harder to conceal your location and future travel plans.

Also, in response to other posts, I take the point that Katherine, Anne and Sophie and Camilla, have all received negative press and threats to their safety in their time, but speaking very generally, they all seem to be quite popular atm and inspire lots of positive publicity that generally outweighs the bad, whereas looking at it objectively, the general attitude towards MM seems to be universally negative and the rhetoric against her and Harry is full of vitriol, so I would have said that the threat at this moment in time is higher for H&M atm but of course that will probably diminish in future.

And from a PR and security issue, it would be better if the feud between the two sides could be resolved so that all of the hysteria in the press can die down and it becomes a non-story.

I think it genuinely becomes a lot harder to conceal your location and future travel plans.

Well, when you're leaking your 'itinerary' to 'Hello' magazine and giving near daily updates to your favoured press outlets, then yeah, it is a lot harder.

so I would have said that the threat at this moment in time is higher for H&M atm but of course that will probably diminish in future.

It doesn't matter what you say. Or what I say. RAVEC, who have access to up to date intelligence, have made their assessments on that basis.

Harry and his family are not wanted or needed in Britain, so if the (very generous) security arrangements aren't to his liking he should by all means stay at home. Or maybe travel to Nigeria or Colombia instead.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread