PR Disasters Chapter 15

[FenellaFeldman]

The saga continues

Questions about mansions and godparents, jam and shared Monarchy. Whatever next?

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/the_royal_family/5533035-pr-disasters-chapter-14?utm_campaign=thread&utm_medium=app_share
Last thread

Thanks for the new thread

Thanks Fenella.

Thank you @FenellaFeldman

Thanks @FenellaFeldman it does roll round at the moment. More manifestation and temu matches to look forward to.

Morning everyone, the last thread ended on a very interesting point.

Many thanks @FenellaFeldman🙏

Thanks for the thread @FenellaFeldman
The countdown to Peter Phillips’s wedding has started. Let’s see what this week brings…

And it’s Princess Lilibet’s birthday this week too, isn’t it? I wonder if one of her pressies will be another breach of her privacy to help prop up Mama’s failing business 🤔

No doubt about that….

Thanks for the new thread. I was pondering this morning about the Temu comment and her clapback, how stupid do you have to be to think the "Temu princess" remark translated to "your stuff is from Temu" ?

I mean, it SO obviously didn't mean that, it meant something along the lines of "you're a knock off, cheap princess, not the real thing, you're only a princess because you married Harry and much of what you do is tacky, low rent, imitative or tacky. Like Temu."

It wasn't defamatory although it was insulting, but how dense is she that she didn't get the meaning? Or is she hoping people will believe it means her products are from Temu instead of the above?

Clapping back just gave it airtime and not in a good way. There is such a thing as bad publicity as the gruesome twosome keep illustrating!

Why are H&M rumoured to owe Tyler Perry $14 million? Does anyone have any clues about the sources / evidence? I’m intrigued.

The Temu thing certainly gives credence to the claims I’ve seen on here that Meghan is ND. Misunderstanding nuance / metaphor / allusion etc is a very autistic thing to do.
NB not saying that ND status has anything at all to do with her awful personality or behaviour btw.

Their house cost 14 million didn't it? Maybe Tyler paid for it at the time as they were 'finding freedom' and he thought they'd owe him hugely?

Thank you for the new thread @FenellaFeldman 😊

She seems to be used, more so than Archie.

Rumour has it that during a brain storming session, Meghan was advised that people react more positively to girls than boys ! This is apparently why poor Archie was retired and lily was put front and centre! 🤷‍♀️

Interesting! I didn't know that. I was wondering if it was because there's a direct link to the late Queen because of the distinctive name.

She might just identify herself more closely with the child of the same sex.

I wonder why? Your children are surely the same to you? All parents are different I suppose.

As with so many stories about these two, this is simultaneously too insane to be true and also horribly plausible 😬

Yes, I'm inclined to think it's connected to the daughter's more distinctive and marketable name, but it could be for other reasons too.

Oprah wouldn't have needed to "pay" H&M direct for money to change hands for that interview. Paying money direct to Archewell may have been an extremely good option for her - a tax write off for Oprah, achieved in giving money to a non profit, so a win win for her all round; and a "pay day" for the Sussexes, whose Delaware registered "foundation" would allow 95% of any receipts to be spent on Archewell's "expenses"

I know this was from the last thread, @Indianrollerbird, but actually it makes complete sense ... a perfect way of pretending not to be paid and, if it ever came out, to claim that it was all for charideee

Duplicitous of course, but then so is practically everythhing they do

And thanks from me too for the new thread, @FenellaFeldman

I'm pretty sure Harry made some remark about having a mortgage, Papercompany, but then he's made a hell of a lot of remarks which bear no relationship to the truth so who knows?