Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Footage of Charlotte

469 replies

Aspecialkindofhell · 02/05/2026 17:14

Does anyone else feel really uncomfortable about the photos the RF have put out of Charlotte today? Likewise the photo of them all lying in the sand. I feel those photos should be personal . She’s only 11, on holiday and those moments should be private.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 18:10

jeffgoldblum · 03/05/2026 18:09

@sunflowersinthedayor @Lundeplease do the honours , I can’t be bothered to.

Gosh so xxx yourself

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 18:11

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 18:08

Yes, you're right. We are legally citizens.

That’s ok - it was a joke

noonames · 03/05/2026 18:11

IckyIck · 03/05/2026 17:50

She wasn't ever the Spare.

What do you think ‘the Spare’ means, if not second in line to the throne?

(Which Harry never was btw, as PPs have said.)

jeffgoldblum · 03/05/2026 18:11

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 18:08

jeffgoldblum · Today 18:00
Harry has never been a true spare anyway! He’s never been higher than 3rd ! , I don’t mean to sound rude because I know that you agree about the children but honestly I’m quite shocked that you don’t understand or know how the line of succession works.

you must have a very sheltered life - I do understand I just thought Anne wasn’t in it - I got mixed up

Me sheltered because I actually know history and the line of succession?!
thats a new one! 🤣

jeffgoldblum · 03/05/2026 18:13

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 18:10

Gosh so xxx yourself

Being rude to someone because you were wrong isn’t a good look!

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 18:14

jeffgoldblum · 03/05/2026 18:11

Me sheltered because I actually know history and the line of succession?!
thats a new one! 🤣

No sheltered because you can’t get over I got it wrong

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 18:15

jeffgoldblum · 03/05/2026 18:13

Being rude to someone because you were wrong isn’t a good look!

Not at all I’ve admitted I was wrong but you mis be able to see how superior your post is

IcedPurple · 03/05/2026 18:16

This was an interesting discussion before it turned into a personal spat of no interest to anyone else.

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 18:17

jeffgoldblum · 03/05/2026 18:11

Me sheltered because I actually know history and the line of succession?!
thats a new one! 🤣

Just to quote you…

Being rude to someone because you were wrong isn’t a good look!

are you able to go back to the point of the post yet?

SoGoodToSeeYou · 03/05/2026 18:18

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 18:07

I think they are kept a very good eye on by W and K and I don’t fear for them

they seem ok - haven’t read anything awful has happened by touching a few of us great unwashed 😂

Would you ask any child you didn’t know for a hug, whether a non famous child, a celeb, or Royal? I would hope not. Would you let your child hug someone they didn’t know, even if they were a celeb or Royal. I would hope not.

Parents don’t really let their children take photos with strangers or hug strangers. It’s basic parenting. It’s not appropriate because there are unfortunately some weird people around. I don’t know why anyone would try to justify it but hopefully it is something that doesn’t happen again this year at Xmas. The people asking, especially for hugs, are overstepping and very weird.

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 18:18

IcedPurple · 03/05/2026 18:16

This was an interesting discussion before it turned into a personal spat of no interest to anyone else.

Exactly - thank you!

cam we go back to it

I got it wrong about Anne being in line of succession and have said so - but some posters are aghast and can’t believe it and want to feel superior somehow

let’s get back to thread

IdaGlossop · 03/05/2026 18:18

Aspecialkindofhell · 03/05/2026 08:04

Just to be clear. They are lovely photos and videos. I think W and K seem to be doing a fantastic job. I think all the kids seem incredibly well adjusted and happy . I suppose I just wonder if some of those photos of a beautiful pre pubescent girl might be viewed in the wrong way by the wrong sort of person. Maybe I’m just being really paranoid. That’s what the shorts comment was about.
I didnt realise that the family had used an official photographer. Kate has taken a lot of photos herself of family holidays in the past , but obviously the shot of them lying down was taken by someone else.

'A beautiful pre-pubescent girl'. You are coming close to sexualising her yourself, OP. The reality is that the Royal children are photographed at events too. Paedophiles who want to have sexual fantasies about her can do so equally from a shot of her on the Buckingham Palace balcony in a tailored coat as from one of her lying on the grass in shorts.

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 18:19

jeffgoldblum · 03/05/2026 18:09

@sunflowersinthedayor @Lundeplease do the honours , I can’t be bothered to.

Let's just give up 😉

jeffgoldblum · 03/05/2026 18:19

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 18:15

Not at all I’ve admitted I was wrong but you mis be able to see how superior your post is

Me posting correct comments isn’t superior and you didn’t actually admit you were wrong to start with you argued with posters first until it was obvious that you had been wrong.
perhaps you should leave it there.

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 18:20

IdaGlossop · 03/05/2026 18:18

'A beautiful pre-pubescent girl'. You are coming close to sexualising her yourself, OP. The reality is that the Royal children are photographed at events too. Paedophiles who want to have sexual fantasies about her can do so equally from a shot of her on the Buckingham Palace balcony in a tailored coat as from one of her lying on the grass in shorts.

Yes agree - we can’t control that

I disnt think the photo
looked very pre pubescent -

IcedPurple · 03/05/2026 18:20

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 18:18

Exactly - thank you!

cam we go back to it

I got it wrong about Anne being in line of succession and have said so - but some posters are aghast and can’t believe it and want to feel superior somehow

let’s get back to thread

Edited

Just don't respond then.

Posters wanting to be the one to get the last word in is incredibly tiresome for everyone else.

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 18:21

jeffgoldblum · 03/05/2026 18:19

Me posting correct comments isn’t superior and you didn’t actually admit you were wrong to start with you argued with posters first until it was obvious that you had been wrong.
perhaps you should leave it there.

I did! Have no problem saying I was wrong

yes let’s get back to the post - you are very clever and I’m not - there you go

IdaGlossop · 03/05/2026 18:21

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 18:20

Yes agree - we can’t control that

I disnt think the photo
looked very pre pubescent -

Nor me. That's why I was taken aback by the comment.

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 18:21

IcedPurple · 03/05/2026 18:20

Just don't respond then.

Posters wanting to be the one to get the last word in is incredibly tiresome for everyone else.

They were asking me questions about how I couldn’t know and wanted to know

your right I won’t respond now

jeffgoldblum · 03/05/2026 18:22

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 18:19

Let's just give up 😉

Indeed I’m bored.👍

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 18:22

IdaGlossop · 03/05/2026 18:21

Nor me. That's why I was taken aback by the comment.

I think I’ve got to go back and have a look now 😂

sunflowersintheday · 03/05/2026 18:22

IdaGlossop · 03/05/2026 18:18

'A beautiful pre-pubescent girl'. You are coming close to sexualising her yourself, OP. The reality is that the Royal children are photographed at events too. Paedophiles who want to have sexual fantasies about her can do so equally from a shot of her on the Buckingham Palace balcony in a tailored coat as from one of her lying on the grass in shorts.

Absolutely this.

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 18:23

No she just looks like a girl to me

i felt bad though going back to look from that angle

noonames · 03/05/2026 18:24

I wonder if this thread is part of the preparation for the reveal of the Sussex children…

OP: isn’t it awful posting photos of poor Charlotte online, the only other option is that we never know what she looks like

PPs: not really - they are very select, there’s a good reason for it, keeping the children hidden would be wrong

[photo of Lili holding a pot of jam in one hand and a placard reading PLEASE BUY OUR TAT in the other arrives on insta]

Some posters: ugh how exploitative

Others: YOU SAID IT WAS FINE FOR CHARLOTTE, KEEPING CHILDREN HIDDEN WOULD BE WRONG YOU SAID, HYPOCRITES!

IdaGlossop · 03/05/2026 18:26

Pippilongstocking2 · 03/05/2026 18:22

I think I’ve got to go back and have a look now 😂

😆 Make sure you have a really good look. Homing in on areas of interest and expanding them helps a lot. So much easier than the magnifying glass people used to have to use before digitisation.