Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Prince William's Christian Journey

348 replies

BoxingHare · 25/03/2026 10:38

Here we go, another article about that 'quiet faith' that has been completely silent until now!

As one of the btl comments suggests, is there some rebranding going on???

Surely not!

Prince William’s Christian journey https://share.google/6ANWHkV5p0o0qj1TV

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
simpsonthecat · 06/04/2026 13:14

Your edit came too late for my post

corblimeyguvnr · 06/04/2026 13:19

Ukisgaslit · 06/04/2026 13:13

@corblimeyguvnr

No the topic is William and religion

Reference to other monarchies - note many of the remaining monarchies worldwide who persist with coronations are absolute monarchies - is irrelevant .

Oh I don't think it's irrelevant but I can see you are limiting your ridicule to the British RF because it suits your point. You lost your point however by mocking about vests and hairy chests.

simpsonthecat · 06/04/2026 13:21

corblimeyguvnr · 06/04/2026 13:19

Oh I don't think it's irrelevant but I can see you are limiting your ridicule to the British RF because it suits your point. You lost your point however by mocking about vests and hairy chests.

Suit yourself! I am not discussing other parts of the world's rituals. I'm not worried you think I lost my point. I have an opinion. You have an opinion.

jeffgoldblum · 06/04/2026 13:23

Ukisgaslit · 06/04/2026 13:13

@corblimeyguvnr

No the topic is William and religion

Reference to other monarchies - note many of the remaining monarchies worldwide who persist with coronations are absolute monarchies - is irrelevant .

If by your own words “ the topic is William and religion “ then arguably you bringing Andrew and Epstein in is also irrelevant to this discussion! 🤷‍♀️

corblimeyguvnr · 06/04/2026 13:25

It's a shame you can't express it without mockery. It immediately degrades the opinion. @simpson

simpsonthecat · 06/04/2026 13:34

I can live with your disapproval 😊

Ukisgaslit · 06/04/2026 13:36

corblimeyguvnr · 06/04/2026 13:19

Oh I don't think it's irrelevant but I can see you are limiting your ridicule to the British RF because it suits your point. You lost your point however by mocking about vests and hairy chests.

Oh I will ridicule them to til the cows come home . The Windsors deserve much harsher treatment than ridicule

And speaking of ridicule - the Windsors’ decade long protection of Andrew and multiple remaining questions about the links the rest of them have to Epstein make a mockery of the UK and a mockery of those who are sincere in their religion .

jeffgoldblum · 06/04/2026 13:38

Ukisgaslit · 06/04/2026 13:36

Oh I will ridicule them to til the cows come home . The Windsors deserve much harsher treatment than ridicule

And speaking of ridicule - the Windsors’ decade long protection of Andrew and multiple remaining questions about the links the rest of them have to Epstein make a mockery of the UK and a mockery of those who are sincere in their religion .

Again making your own comment about only discussing the thread topic a complete mockery! 🤷‍♀️

Ukisgaslit · 06/04/2026 13:38

jeffgoldblum · 06/04/2026 13:23

If by your own words “ the topic is William and religion “ then arguably you bringing Andrew and Epstein in is also irrelevant to this discussion! 🤷‍♀️

Andrew is always relevant to any mention of the Windsors and in any aspect.

They protected him and continue to hide their own links .
Decent people are disgusted by the lot of them .

jeffgoldblum · 06/04/2026 13:41

Ukisgaslit · 06/04/2026 13:38

Andrew is always relevant to any mention of the Windsors and in any aspect.

They protected him and continue to hide their own links .
Decent people are disgusted by the lot of them .

In your opinion!
honestly you are the worse spokesman for republicans, every word and post from you drips of venom and personal hatred towards not the monarchy but these people personally, it puts most people off including actual republicans and frankly makes most of us more sympathetic towards them than we would normally be!
further more you have no evidence for your accusations apart from your personal hatred.

simpsonthecat · 06/04/2026 13:44

Andrew is always relevant to any mention of the Windsors and in any aspect.

⬆️ This!
AMW is affecting every single aspect of our Monarchy, uncomfortable though that may be for some!
He is still under investigation by Thames Valley Police and possibly also the Met. The Yorks have caused a fracture and a crisis within the British Monarchy so, of course, can be discussed on a Royal board

jeffgoldblum · 06/04/2026 13:48

simpsonthecat · 06/04/2026 13:44

Andrew is always relevant to any mention of the Windsors and in any aspect.

⬆️ This!
AMW is affecting every single aspect of our Monarchy, uncomfortable though that may be for some!
He is still under investigation by Thames Valley Police and possibly also the Met. The Yorks have caused a fracture and a crisis within the British Monarchy so, of course, can be discussed on a Royal board

It’s not uncomfortable to expect threads to remain on topic !!!
the hypocritical screams of outrage when h and m are mentioned and accusations of derailment have come from your own mouth!
andrew has been discussed and declared guilty on many threads by most of us , and there is nothing linking William and his “quiet faith” to Epstein any more than links Harry .

P0cketP1g · 06/04/2026 13:53

Goldfsh · 26/03/2026 16:13

What's your point @BemusedAmerican ? Are you saying that Christian leaders need to be more moral than others? And how would you judge that? Good Christians like, erm Trump, who believes he is ushering in the second coming by blitzing the middle east ... ?

I mean the Church of England, of which the regent is the Supreme Leader, was established on slightly shaky moral foundations but I don't think we'd argue it should therefore be scrapped?

The bible is quite clear about leaders of churches and how they're expected to behave. You can find this online if you don't have a bible and, you can request a free bible online, too.

If you read the bible, it answers a lot of questions not available in the public, non-believing sector of the general population.

Christians aren't Christians by word of the mouth. The bible is also quite clear that some people will profess to be righteous but they will be judged by their actions (fruits) and not their words. So, there are many people who profess to be Christians, for whatever reason, but do not live a Christian life and so are deceivers. Again, this is in the bible.

I hope this helps!

Ukisgaslit · 06/04/2026 13:53

No you are wrong @jeffgoldblum

There is of course a campaign to separate Andrew and his family from the rest of the Windsors but it’s not working

They all have questions to answer .
They would still be covering much of it up were it not for the partial release of the Epstein files

simpsonthecat · 06/04/2026 13:59

Haha JeffG. I am not sure I 'scream' and am 'outraged'. I have far more peaceful and wonderful things to think about in my life.

I think W's quiet faith might be needed as he tries to navigate the AMW situation as he still appears to be playing silly buggers and holding on to two houses! You talk like the Andrew thing is over, far from it!

BoxingHare · 06/04/2026 14:00

In what way is AMW relevant to a thread about William and his religious beliefs? (Rhetorical question, for the love of God don't answer as I've no interest in a reply.)

Some of you deserve a medal, you really can bicker pointlessly for the nation.

Maybe William will be handing them out?

OP posts:
Serenster · 06/04/2026 14:15

simpsonthecat · 06/04/2026 13:44

Andrew is always relevant to any mention of the Windsors and in any aspect.

⬆️ This!
AMW is affecting every single aspect of our Monarchy, uncomfortable though that may be for some!
He is still under investigation by Thames Valley Police and possibly also the Met. The Yorks have caused a fracture and a crisis within the British Monarchy so, of course, can be discussed on a Royal board

How very “Carthago delenda est” …

jeffgoldblum · 06/04/2026 14:24

Ukisgaslit · 06/04/2026 13:53

No you are wrong @jeffgoldblum

There is of course a campaign to separate Andrew and his family from the rest of the Windsors but it’s not working

They all have questions to answer .
They would still be covering much of it up were it not for the partial release of the Epstein files

No im afraid that is only your opinion and has no basis with actual evidence.

jeffgoldblum · 06/04/2026 14:26

BoxingHare · 06/04/2026 14:00

In what way is AMW relevant to a thread about William and his religious beliefs? (Rhetorical question, for the love of God don't answer as I've no interest in a reply.)

Some of you deserve a medal, you really can bicker pointlessly for the nation.

Maybe William will be handing them out?

I was trying to point that out but I’m afraid that some like to shoehorn their own narrative onto all threads! 🤷‍♀️

Ukisgaslit · 06/04/2026 14:37

jeffgoldblum · 06/04/2026 14:24

No im afraid that is only your opinion and has no basis with actual evidence.

No . There is plenty of evidence that the Windsors knew about Epstein for over a decade

We also have their very own words calling an Epstein victim a liar when they would have had the facts at their fingertips . They have never apologised or withdrawn that statement

That you don’t bother to educate yourself about the history of the Windsors over the last decade is up to you . But your heated words suggest to me that deep down you know they have questions to answer .

jeffgoldblum · 06/04/2026 14:41

Ukisgaslit · 06/04/2026 14:37

No . There is plenty of evidence that the Windsors knew about Epstein for over a decade

We also have their very own words calling an Epstein victim a liar when they would have had the facts at their fingertips . They have never apologised or withdrawn that statement

That you don’t bother to educate yourself about the history of the Windsors over the last decade is up to you . But your heated words suggest to me that deep down you know they have questions to answer .

Feelings and theories are not actual evidence, you are posting your opinion as fact but it carries no weight with anyone who isn’t already subscribed to this particular conspiracy.
in the meantime you are seriously derailing the ops thread , if you want to take over and push your agenda perhaps join one already about Andrew or make one yourself.

Ukisgaslit · 06/04/2026 14:57

Conspiracy ?

Im afraid you are looking increasingly uninformed .

Epstein was convicted of child solicitation in 2008 . This was public knowledge .

Yes nearly a decade before the Windsors took the limited action they have since taken .
Legal papers were prevented from being delivered to Andrew , after the statement blackening Virginias name Elizabeth Windsor ensured she was photographed with him- we even now know Epstein was emailing the palace querying the use of words the Windsors were using to try to distance themselves from him!

There is plenty of evidence . No conspiracy.
But interesting that you try to suggest that the long history of Epstein with the Windsors as that .

BoxingHare · 06/04/2026 15:01

Ukisgaslit · 06/04/2026 14:57

Conspiracy ?

Im afraid you are looking increasingly uninformed .

Epstein was convicted of child solicitation in 2008 . This was public knowledge .

Yes nearly a decade before the Windsors took the limited action they have since taken .
Legal papers were prevented from being delivered to Andrew , after the statement blackening Virginias name Elizabeth Windsor ensured she was photographed with him- we even now know Epstein was emailing the palace querying the use of words the Windsors were using to try to distance themselves from him!

There is plenty of evidence . No conspiracy.
But interesting that you try to suggest that the long history of Epstein with the Windsors as that .

I think you're on the wrong thread.

This one's already a complete bore fest with the multiple pages of pointless bickering, why make it even more so?

OP posts:
corblimeyguvnr · 06/04/2026 17:06

Ukisgaslit · 06/04/2026 13:36

Oh I will ridicule them to til the cows come home . The Windsors deserve much harsher treatment than ridicule

And speaking of ridicule - the Windsors’ decade long protection of Andrew and multiple remaining questions about the links the rest of them have to Epstein make a mockery of the UK and a mockery of those who are sincere in their religion .

I don't think you are @simpsonthecat. Why are you answering for her? She said it . Not you.

simpsonthecat · 06/04/2026 17:43

Methinks you are trying to pick an argument with anyone who has a different opinion to you! 🤣

No need to @ me, I have a quiet day and will catch up with this thread when I fancy, I have notifications turned off anyway so never see them 👍😊