Well it fits under PR disaster. Harry’s court case in January….things don’t look good for the claimants ….at all!
This Telegraph article reveals that more evidence the claimants have, are baseless.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2025/12/11/prince-harrys-phone-hacking-case-suffers-another-blow/
https://archive.ph/aTxGs
This is from a Reddit poster who helpfully broke it down:
‘Baroness Lawrence's Case (One of the Seven Claimants):
Her witness statement claimed Jonathan Rees confirmed he bugged her for the Daily Mail. What she says was confirmed? That the landline was tapped, voicemails were hacked, and covert electronic surveillance.
Jonathan Rees to Dispatches:
"I didn't get involved."
When told her witness statement is based on your confirmation that you had done the bugging operation
Rees replied: "Right, well they're going to have to rethink that, and their legal team is going to have to re-think that."
Baroness Lawrence's entire case is based on confirmation from a guy who now says he didn't do it.
Enter Gavin Burrows (private investigator).
He provided a witness statement claiming he did bugging/hacking for Associated on Harry's behalf. BUT Burrows now says Statement was "false" and his signature was "forged"
Why this matters?
Burrows's claims were instrumental in getting Baroness Lawrence to join the lawsuit. Tracking?
H used Burrows's evidence to recruit other claimants. Still tracking? Good.
ENTER GRAHAM JOHNSON THE PAID RESEARCHER
Who is he?
Former tabloid journalist, convicted of phone hacking, admitted making up stories in his career, now paid £160/hour as researcher to H’s legal team.
Now, what did the Dispatchers find?
Jonathan Rees claims Johnson approached him 7 years ago offering high rewards for information against tabloids, £2,500/month for life for information that would add credence to legal claims.
Rees has no proof, but multiple private detectives say Johnson approached them. That’s something, that counts.
Let’s move on to the Max Mosley Connection
Johnson's company Yellow Press received a £500,000 loan from Max Mosley's company before Mosley died (‘21). Mosley was obsessed with destroying tabloids after his own scandal, and Yellow Press publishes memoirs from journalists/PIs whose info appears in lawsuits against newspapers.
Hugh Grant funded Johnson's research into Daily Mail/Ian Huntley rumors but says: "I have never used the services of Graham Johnson... for evidence gathering for litigation of any kind."
SO WHAT TF DOES THIS MEAN??
H’s legal team did what?
Used a convicted phone hacker who admitted making up stories as paid researcher
That researcher potentially offered £2,500/month bribes for information
Was funded by Max Mosley's vendetta money
Produced witness statements that are now being recanted or called forged
The judge already warned them (days ago, discussed here ) about the £38m costs and inadequate insurance. Now their evidence base is collapsing.
Trial starts January. If Baroness Lawrence's case crumbles (because Rees denied it), and Burrows recanted his statement, and the paid researcher is a convicted phone hacker allegedly bribing witnesses... Then?’