Is Meghan a narcissist?

[Clbs]

I keep seeing these reels and social media smears on Meghan being a narcissist and abusive partner to Harry. She certainly doesn't seem overly popular with the royal family or understood the expectations of her as a royal when she married him.

I'm by no means a royalist or a fan of Megan's. But I'm the same age as Harry so always felt I could relate a little to him. I haven't read his book or watched the netflix docs.

The main thing that doesn't sit quite right for me is they wanted a 'private life' and then done anything but. Did Megan use Harry's desire for privacy to isolate him from his family and friends?

The backs of their heads are you serious.

England no longer feels tolerant anymore it's scary.

He has caused, and continues to cause his own pain, as well as Meghan aiding it too, but she doesn’t give a stuff because it’s not her family, just her golden ticket which she’s already cashing in on, that and her kids … because that’s all she’s got

Wrongly quoted … meant this comment

Why is it 😧? … because it’s true? Their children don’t know any of their family bar Doria, and she seems to have dipped out of their lives too

His family are not completely blameless. Andrew and Charles grew up in the same household. If Andrew is dysfunctional then so is Charles. If anything Meghan has given him stability and purpose which he didn't have before he met her.

The royal family uses their children to keep the love and MONEY flowing in. I don't blame them if it was me I would show all of my family off to. All I have to do is turn up to events and remain impartial.

They get their faces blurred or their behind is shown. The royal family has always been known to show off the children. Is that what upsets you you don't know what they look like?

Yes. The children’s experiences of being filmed and photographed, and the invasion of their privacy (what they are wearing, saying, doing, their health status etc) to support their mother’s business and the television shows is the same, whether or not there are emojis over their faces or not.

That's what the royal family has always done now you are finding a problem or is it because they have not showed them off. It must really bug some of you that you don't know what the little prince and princess look like.

Not sure I’ve seen any pictures of any of the children hawking the Highgrove preserves as yet, they just attend events, see their families and go about their business from what I’ve seen

They can't go about their business they have to remain impartial. It's only after the queen has died people are learning what her opinion was on Brexit she was a remainer.

What are you talking about?! The children ‘go about their business’ ie go to sports matches, go to school, holidays etc … not share theie
views on Brexit, the current government or when Peppa pig

you do know the King is his father? so he gave his Father a photo of is kids........
so what.
the fans are really reaching again.

They are shown off when the ‘price i$$$$ right’

They had a full face frontal of Archie naked in the bath - for Netflix - and when the whole world was looking at the UK for QE2 jubilee celebrations they issued a full face frontal of Lily to the global media.

Read the quote I responded to. The poster claimed that Harry was not involving the children. Only he is.

Whose fans?

Can you remember the details of the LaineyGossip piece where MM ‘the humanitarian’ was conjured up out of thin air in summer 2016 so that MM would have a (fake) compassionate profile attractive to PH? Literally re-writing history to bag a prince.

However she was later rumbled later though when she demanded that her subsequent interview with Vanity Fair focus on her humanitarian/charity efforts - and none were included because ‘the researchers couldn’t find and evidence of any’ and the editor of VF Grayson Carter described her as ‘slightly adrift from facts and reality’ - which was way before OW tissue of lies and the infamous ‘recollections may vary’.

Plenty of people have had the measure of her over the years.

Was that the one where she was quoted saying something along the lines of 'I have one foot on the red carpet and one in a refugee camp'? Accompanied by pictures of her in a white shirt, sleeves rolled up and sunglasses hanging through her buttonhole, striking a 'Diana' pose?

This is what Meghan wrote on the Tig in 2016, about a week before her relationship with Harry was made public (What a coincidence! Just before the world finds out who she is she’s out there burnishing her philanthropic credentials…) . I think the pendulum has swung quite a bit further to the excess side now she’s picked the Hollywood life than she she wanted to suggest at that stage, and she has of course recently said that she is actively choosing not to speak on politics:

It was just last year that I was in the van heading back from Gihembe refugee camp in Rwanda. I was in the country as an advocate for UN Women…. Driving back on the dusty roads that day, now back on the grid of tech and Hollywood, I received an email from my managers with a request for me to attend the BAFTAs. I had never been and had always romanticized the idea of it – and per the email, a high end jewelry company was going to fly me in, get me dolled up in the fanciest of gowns, and I would travel straight from Kigali to Heathrow, to the makeup chair, and immediately onto the red carpet.

My brain, heart, spirit couldn’t shift gears that quickly – from the purpose-driven work I had been doing all week in Rwanda, to the glitz and glamour of an award show – plus the pomp and circumstance that comes with it. “No,” my heart said. And it wasn’t a soft whisper to myself; it was a lion’s roar. … My gut said, “No.” While my two worlds can coexist, I’ve learned that for me, being able to keep a foot in both is a delicate balance – because while they are not mutually exclusive, guiding my heart though the swinging pendulum from excess to lack of access is sometimes challenging.

(I also massively side-eye the BAFTAs bit. Why would any UK-based jewellery company offer a then little-known American tv actress the chance to be their ambassador at an event celebrating the UK film industry?)

And yes, Meghan Markle's Wikipedia profile was edited by an IP address linked to a Los Angeles PR firm just days before her relationship with Prince Harry became public in October 2016. The edits changed her occupation from "model" to "actress, activist, humanitarian," removed references to her role as a suitcase girl on Deal or No Deal, and added details about The Tig, and her humanitarian work. While the edits were anonymous, the timing is interesting.

www.businessinsider.com/meghan-markle-wikipedia-occupation-changed-prince-harry-relationship-reveal-2020-7

That prose now sounds like AI slop. The bit about the heart's whisper and the lion's roar. Every youtube video has that sort of voice over now where metaphors are not strained but stretched, pulled like the whispering heart of a humanitarian... etc etc.

She literally kicked off in the RF, before married, with the lies and ‘manoeuvring’ the truth to benefit her more favourably … puts pay to the ‘fact’ that everyone else was out to put her down/give stories to the press when she was at it from the get go! She absolutely lies and fakes her way through life

Anne and Edward seem very stable and very normal but they grew up in the same household. Are you saying the siblings of anyone that is unstable can't possibly be well adjusted ?

Oh do stop. Your hobby horse has galloped onto on the wrong thread.