Harry and RAVEC - claims he was trapped by RF

[smilesy]

Okay. So first of all thanks to everyone on the last thread for a really civilised discussion about Harry and his security. The Telegraph has an exclusive article where Harry claims that his security was removed to “trap” him in the RF. I’m really sorry but for some reason I am unable to archive Telegraph articles at the moment. Could anyone help?

He doesn't want to inform RAVEC of his movements in advance

Yes you are totally correct - because he refuses to follow procedure to give 30 days notice - in his own irrational head he can spin that into 'I get no security in the UK' as his 'truth'.

Harry didn't know William was not in the UK.

Wonder if once William knows PH is on the move he scarpers?

I can’t understand that either @Ethela . He’d have tight security at a Royal residence!

But that wouldn't be personal security for him and so not good enough

Because he's a div !

Until the Wales’ DC start having kids & Harry moves down the LoS, he will continue to be a thorn in the side of the RF.

Possibly even beyond that. He'll want special treatment for his children. They have called her Princess Lilibet Diana for a reason.

Shocking if that's true!

Why do they keep referring to MM as 'TW'? Is it 'the wife', 'the witch"!

I suspect that his phone etc would be removed and he's be searched too.

@MrsLeonFarrell Oh yeah, the British taxpayer needs to fork out plenty ‘cos there isn’t anything else important that desperately needs funding, is there? 😂

That's shocking! Who the hell does this woman think she is?! She's little better than a common thief? If you'd just married into a wealthy family wouldn't you be taking it easy until you worked out the lie of the land? She's just a nasty, grabby social climber.

The original grifters. And here we have version 2.

It's neither imho. He was led by his stupid dick by her and she thought that they could make far more money outside the RF than in. They wanted to stay in at the same time to maximise their earning potential and do all the shiney, starry, high publicity duties. TLQ saw them coming, didn't she?!

She's just greedy and grasping and so is he.

It's probably too big for her now though. I guess she could always get it altered.

The Spectator

https://archive.ph/kCTtV

He bangs on about the UK being too perilous for his family, waging legal crusades over security provisions, yet here he is, swanning into war zones and countries with travel warnings, trading on his fading royal luster to clutch at relevance – all while dodging the duties he willingly jettisoned. Bereft of official standing in America or Britain, his quest to play maverick royal smacks of pantomime.

His tell-all tome bared a chap desperate to ditch protocol and flashbulbs. Yet his post-royal antics tell another tale. Far from skulking into obscurity, he’s built a career on exposure – lucrative media contracts, a confessional book and stage-managed tours that hold him in the public’s gaze. If he yearned for quiet, why hog the limelight?

The Sussexes are not serving – they are performing to the camera, and the world’s their stage.

After all the b*tching he did about others briefing the media, it's Harry who's as leaky as a sieve!

It's all getting very silly now.

The Sussexes have always leaked to the press, and are not above colluding with the tabloids. Whatever gets the headlines and the clicks, I guess.
The pair of them have done well this week! Lots of front pages.

It is. It does make one wonder just how long it will be possible for pa & co to continue not complaining and not explaining. The outcome of the Charity Commission investigation and ?statutory enquiry, and the ruling from the court of appeal must surely be a watershed moment (or two). The aspect of it all that is becoming more and more prominent is that Harry is using up thousands of pounds of public money in a nation in which nearly a third of all children live in poverty. It is getting silly, and boring, but he is a real liability and threat to national security - going to Ukraine without liaising with the Foreign Office, making insinuations about the security information he heard in camera last week, making him in contempt if court. In addition, Meghan has broken the Sandringham summit agreement by making money from their titles, Harry is still a counsellor of state despite having no home in the UK, there has been no formal authenticating of two children who are sixth and seventh in the line of succession. Lots of loose ends that need tying up.

The Sussexes have always leaked to the press, and are not above colluding with the tabloids

or authors, or social media 'influencers' / dementors / squads.

@IdaGlossop or perhaps @Serenster knows

"making insinuations about the security information he heard in camera last week, making him in contempt if court. "

Given he didn't quote anything, just gave his opinion details were shocking , is this contempt of court or just very bad form.

Either way he or his barrister must be in line for a reprimand. He's implying counsel for the HO are telling lies , surely?

But at least Meghan got some nice Instagram content out of his visit.

Well according to google maps it's between 1.9 - 2.6 miles from Chelsea Old Town Hall to BP. Busy traffic but a decent driver could find some back roads I'm sure.

Funny how he gave a different excuse not to attend his other 'bestie' Hugh Grosvenor The Duke of Westminster's huge society wedding last year - PW (a groomsman?) & Eugenie attended....decided between them best he not come - nothing to do with security mentioned then.

He really is a vexatious and mendacious fool.

Yes, you'd have to wonder how long they can sit and let this circus go on, but what can they realistically do? Cut Harry out of the will?